17.12.2020 Views

API RP 581 - 3rd Ed.2016 - Add.2-2020 - Risk-Based Inspection Methodology

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5-28 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581

5 Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles

Overview

This section describes a methodology to assess the reliability and remaining life of heat exchanger bundles.

It also provides a methodology for performing cost benefit analysis to assist in making risk-based inspection

and replacement decisions and to determine the optimal replacement frequency of heat exchanger bundles.

The purpose of the module is to manage heat exchanger bundle inspection and replacement cycles and to

reduce annual operating and maintenance costs of heat exchanger bundles. The costs considered include

bundle fabrication and installation costs, environmental impact costs, and lost opportunity costs due to unit

and plant unplanned shutdowns or unit rate reductions as a result of an unplanned bundle failure.

Background

Analyzing each heat exchanger bundle service history generally does not consider the financial

consequences associated with a bundle failure. Many exchangers experience few or no bundle failures while

some failures may not have occurred at the current operating conditions or practices. In addition, statistically

significant data may not exist in order to make an accurate prediction of future performance or POF for the

heat exchanger bundle.

Basis of Model

The application of risk principles to exchanger bundle inspection allows decisions to be made based on the

consequences of bundle failure, including costs associated with lost production and environmental impact

costs associated with leakage into utility systems and the replacement and maintenance costs associated

with bundle replacement.

The combined experience of heat exchanger bundles of similar design and service is combined and

statistically analyzed to provide a prediction of future performance. The exchanger bundle under evaluation

is matched to similar bundles and statistically analyzed using a Weibayes or similar analysis to estimate the

POF of the bundle. The results from the analysis are used to determine if the exchanger bundle will operate

safely and reliably until the next scheduled maintenance opportunity. See Annex 5.A for an explanation on

how to determine Weibull parameters.

Required Data

The data listed in Table 5.1 shows the minimum data requirements for each heat exchanger bundle.

Methodology Overview

Calculations for the risk and inspection for heat exchanger bundles are performed following the flow chart

shown in Figure 5.1.

An overview of the steps for calculating Risk are shown in the following steps:

a) STEP 1.1⎯Gather and input the bundle basic input data required as defined in Table 5.1.

b) STEP 1.2⎯Gather and input inspection historical data, if available.

tube

tube

c) STEP 1.3⎯Determine the maximum acceptable POF, P based on the calculated

tgt

C and the risk

f

target, Risk .

tgt

d) STEP 1.4⎯Provide MTTF or Weibull parameters for the bundle failure rate curve based on historical

bundle failures in the same or similar service using Weibull analysis or some other statistical approach.

e) STEP 1.5⎯Calculate the POF at the current date, RBI Date, Plan Date, Turnaround Date 1 and

Turnaround Date 2 using the Weibull data.

tube

f) STEP 1.6⎯Determine consequences of bundle failure, C .

f

g) STEP 1.7⎯Calculate the risk at the plan date with and without inspection.

h) STEP 1.8⎯Define a recommended inspection plan.

i) STEP 1.9 – Calculate a bundle replacement frequency.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!