API RP 581 - 3rd Ed.2016 - Add.2-2020 - Risk-Based Inspection Methodology
2.B-112 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581made so that storm water collecting around a AST will cause the base corrosion rate to increase by afactor of 2. If the drainage is so poor that more than one-third of the circumference of the bottom edge ofthe AST is underwater for extended periods of time, then the base corrosion rate is increased by afactor of 3. Good drainage is considered normal, so the multiplier is set to 1 if water does not normallycollect around the base of the AST.d) Adjust for CP, F CP —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given in Table 2.B.14.7. CP is one of theprimary methods used to avoid corrosion of AST bottoms from the soil side. However, the system mustbe installed and maintained properly. The factor is established so that the most credit is given for aproperly functioning CP system in accordance with API 651, but no penalty is assessed for lack of CP.This assumes that the base corrosion rate is for systems without CP. Note that unless a High Levelinspection can verify that the CP system is effective (verified by inspection in compliance with NACERP0169 or equivalent), no credit is obtained for the CP system.e) Adjust for AST Bottom Type, F TB —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given in Table 2.B.14.8. ASTswith properly installed RPBs tend to have bottom corrosion rates comparable to those with a singlebottom.f) Adjustment for Operating Temperature, F ST —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given inTable 2.B.14.9. The operating temperature of the AST may influence external corrosion.2.B.14.3.2Product-Side Corrosion Rate EquationThe steps required to determine the corrosion rate are shown in Figure 2.B.14.1. The corrosion rate may bedetermined using the basic data in Table 2.B.14.2 in conjunction with Equation (2.B.38).CRP = CRPB ⋅FPC ⋅FPT ⋅FSC ⋅ FWD(2.B.38)The product-side base corrosion rate, CR PB , should be determined based on actual inspection data. If thesedata are not available, then the base product-side corrosion rate may be assumed to be 0.05 mm/y (2 mpy).The base corrosion rate is founded on the conditions stated in Table 2.B.14.10.The adjustment factors in Equation (2.B.38) are determined as described below.a) Adjustment for Product Condition, F PC —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given in Table2.B.14.11. Wet conditions should be used if significant bottom sediments and water are present.b) Adjustment for Operating temperature, F PT —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given inTable 2.B.14.12.c) Adjustment for Steam Coil, F SC —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given in Table 2.B.14.13. If asteam coil heater is present, the internal corrosion rate is adjusted upwards slightly due to extra heat,and the possibility of steam leaks from the internal coild) Adjustment for Water Draw-off, F WD —The corrosion rate adjustment factor is given in Table 2.B.14.14.Water draws, when consistently used, can greatly reduce the damaging effects of water at the bottom ofthe AST. To receive the full benefit, water must be drawn weekly or after every receipt.
RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY, PART 2, ANNEX 2.B—DETERMINATION OF CORROSION RATES 2.B-1132.B.14.3.3Combined Atmospheric Storage Tank Floor Corrosion RateThe internal and external corrosion rates are estimated by multiplying the base corrosion rate by therespective adjustment factors. This will produce two separate corrosion rates that are combined as describedbelow. It is assumed that the soil-side corrosion will be localized in nature while the product-side corrosionwill be either generalized or localized. Note that in order to avoid understating the risk, it is recommendedthat the combined corrosion rate should not be set lower than 2 mils per year.a) Option 1—If the internal corrosion is generalized in nature, the corrosion areas will likely overlap suchthat the bottom thickness is simultaneously reduced by both internal and external influences. In thiscase, the internal and external rates are additive.b) Option 2—For pitting and localized corrosion, the chances are low that internal and external rates cancombine to produce an additive effect on wall loss. In this case, the user chooses the greater of the twocorrosion rates as the governing rate for the proceeding step.2.B.14.4CR PCR PBCR SCR SBF CPF PAF PCF PTF SCF SRF STF TBF TDF WDNomenclatureis the product-side corrosion rateis the product-side base corrosion rateis the soil-side corrosion rateis the soil-side base corrosion rateis the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for CPis the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for AST pad typeis the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for product conditionis the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for temperatureis the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for temperatureis the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for soil conditionsis the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for temperatureis the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for AST bottom typeis the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for drainageis the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for water draw-off
- Page 291 and 292: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 293 and 294: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 295 and 296: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 297 and 298: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 299 and 300: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 301 and 302: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 303 and 304: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 305 and 306: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 307 and 308: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 309 and 310: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 311 and 312: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 313 and 314: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 315 and 316: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 317 and 318: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 319 and 320: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 321 and 322: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 323 and 324: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 325 and 326: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 327 and 328: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 329 and 330: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 331 and 332: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 333 and 334: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 335 and 336: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 337 and 338: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 339 and 340: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 341: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 345 and 346: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 347 and 348: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 349 and 350: CONTENTSOVERVIEW ..................
- Page 351 and 352: 2.C-2 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581D
- Page 353 and 354: 2.C-4 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5812
- Page 355 and 356: 2.C-6 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581e
- Page 357 and 358: 2.C-8 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5812
- Page 359 and 360: 2.C-10 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 361 and 362: 2.C-12 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 363 and 364: 2.C-14 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 365 and 366: 2.C-16 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 367 and 368: 2.C-18 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 369 and 370: 2.C-20 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 371 and 372: 2.C-22 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 373 and 374: 2.C-24 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 375 and 376: 2.C-26 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 377 and 378: PART 3CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE METHOD
- Page 379 and 380: 4.6.5 Releases to the Environment .
- Page 381 and 382: 5.9.7 Determination of Final Toxic
- Page 383 and 384: 3-2 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581[7]
- Page 385 and 386: 3-4 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581d)
- Page 387 and 388: 3-6 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5813.9
- Page 389 and 390: 3-8 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5813.1
- Page 391 and 392: 3-10 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5814.
RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY, PART 2, ANNEX 2.B—DETERMINATION OF CORROSION RATES 2.B-113
2.B.14.3.3
Combined Atmospheric Storage Tank Floor Corrosion Rate
The internal and external corrosion rates are estimated by multiplying the base corrosion rate by the
respective adjustment factors. This will produce two separate corrosion rates that are combined as described
below. It is assumed that the soil-side corrosion will be localized in nature while the product-side corrosion
will be either generalized or localized. Note that in order to avoid understating the risk, it is recommended
that the combined corrosion rate should not be set lower than 2 mils per year.
a) Option 1—If the internal corrosion is generalized in nature, the corrosion areas will likely overlap such
that the bottom thickness is simultaneously reduced by both internal and external influences. In this
case, the internal and external rates are additive.
b) Option 2—For pitting and localized corrosion, the chances are low that internal and external rates can
combine to produce an additive effect on wall loss. In this case, the user chooses the greater of the two
corrosion rates as the governing rate for the proceeding step.
2.B.14.4
CR P
CR PB
CR S
CR SB
F CP
F PA
F PC
F PT
F SC
F SR
F ST
F TB
F TD
F WD
Nomenclature
is the product-side corrosion rate
is the product-side base corrosion rate
is the soil-side corrosion rate
is the soil-side base corrosion rate
is the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for CP
is the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for AST pad type
is the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for product condition
is the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for temperature
is the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for temperature
is the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for soil conditions
is the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for temperature
is the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for AST bottom type
is the soil-side corrosion rate correction factor for drainage
is the product-side corrosion rate correction factor for water draw-off