API RP 581 - 3rd Ed.2016 - Add.2-2020 - Risk-Based Inspection Methodology
2.B-12 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581gram of oil sample. While both colorimetric and potentiometric titration methods are available, thepotentiometric method covered by ASTM D664 is the more commonly used method. It should be notedthat the titration neutralizes all of the acids present and not just the naphthenic acids. For example,dissolved hydrogen sulfide will be represented in the TAN of a sample. From a corrosion standpoint, theTAN of the liquid hydrocarbon stream being evaluated rather than the TAN of the whole crude is theimportant parameter in determining susceptibility to naphthenic acid corrosion.g) Another important factor in corrosion is the stream velocity, particularly where naphthenic acid is a factorin corrosion. Increased velocity increases the corrosivity by enhancing removal of protective sulfides.This effect is most pronounced in mixed liquid-vapor phase systems where velocities may be high.h) At particularly low sulfur levels, naphthenic acid corrosion may be more severe, even at low TAN sinceprotective sulfides may not readily form.The process units where sulfidic and naphthenic acid corrosion is most commonly observed are atmosphericand vacuum crude distillation as well as the feed systems of downstream units such as hydrotreaters,catalytic crackers, and cokers. In hydrotreaters, naphthenic acid corrosion has not been reporteddownstream of the hydrogen addition point, even upstream of the reactor. Catalytic crackers and cokersthermally decompose naphthenic acids so this form of corrosion is also not normally reported in thefractionation sections of these units unless uncracked feed is carried in. Naphthenic acids can appear in highconcentrations in lube extract oil streams when naphthenic acid containing feeds are processed. It should benoted that, where naphthenic acids may thermally decompose, lighter organic acids or carbon dioxide mayform that can affect the corrosivity of condensed waters.2.B.3.2 Basic DataThe data listed in Table 2.B.3.1 are required to determine the estimated rate of corrosion in high temperaturesulfidic and naphthenic acid service. If precise data have not been measured, a knowledgeable processspecialist should be consulted.2.B.3.3 Determination of Corrosion RateThe steps required to determine the corrosion rate are shown in Figure 2.B.3.1. The corrosion rate may bedetermined using the basic data in Table 2.B.3.1 in conjunction with Tables 2.B.3.2 through 2.B.3.10.The corrosion rate in high temperature sulfidic environments in the absence of a naphthenic acid influence isbased upon the modified McConomy curves. While various papers have been presented on naphthenic acidcorrosion, no widely accepted correlations have yet been developed between corrosion rate and the variousfactors influencing it. Consequently, the corrosion rate to be used when naphthenic acid is a factor is only anorder-of-magnitude estimate of the corrosion rate. Once a corrosion rate is selected from the appropriatetable, it should be multiplied by a factor of 5 if the velocity is >30.48 m/s (100 ft/s).2.B.3.4 ReferencesSee References [94], [95] (Appendix 3), [96], and [97] in Section 2.2.
RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY, PART 2, ANNEX 2.B—DETERMINATION OF CORROSION RATES 2.B-132.B.3.5 TablesTable 2.B.3.1—High Temperature Sulfidic and Naphthenic AcidCorrosion—Basic Data Required for AnalysisBasic DataMaterial of constructionMaximum temperature, (°C:°F)Sulfur content of the streamTotal acid number (TAN)(TAN = mg KOH/g oil sample)VelocityCommentsDetermine the material of construction of the equipment/piping.For 316 SS, if the Mo content is not known, assume it is < 2.5 wt%.Determine the maximum temperature of the process stream.Determine the sulfur content of the stream that is in this piece of equipment.If sulfur content is not known, contact a knowledgeable process engineerfor an estimate.The TAN of importance is that of the liquid hydrocarbon phase present inthe equipment/piping being evaluated. If not known, consult aknowledgeable process engineer for an estimate.Determine the maximum velocity in this equipment/piping. Althoughconditions in a vessel may be essentially stagnant, the velocity in flowingnozzles should be considered.
- Page 191 and 192: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 193 and 194: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 195 and 196: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 197 and 198: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 199 and 200: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 201 and 202: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 203 and 204: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 205 and 206: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 207 and 208: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 209 and 210: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 211 and 212: CONTENTSTABLE 2.A.1—LEADERSHIP AN
- Page 213 and 214: 2.A-2 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 215 and 216: 2.A-4 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 217 and 218: 2.A-6 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 219 and 220: 2.A-8 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 221 and 222: 2.A-10 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 223 and 224: 2.A-12 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 225 and 226: 2.A-14 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 227 and 228: PART 2, ANNEX 2.BDETERMINATION OF C
- Page 229 and 230: 2.B.8 AMINE CORROSION .............
- Page 231 and 232: Risk-Based Inspection MethodologyPa
- Page 233 and 234: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 235 and 236: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 237 and 238: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 239 and 240: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 241: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 245 and 246: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 247 and 248: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 249 and 250: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 251 and 252: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 253 and 254: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 255 and 256: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 257 and 258: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 259 and 260: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 261 and 262: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 263 and 264: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 265 and 266: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 267 and 268: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 269 and 270: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 271 and 272: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 273 and 274: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 275 and 276: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 277 and 278: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 279 and 280: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 281 and 282: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 283 and 284: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 285 and 286: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 287 and 288: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 289 and 290: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 291 and 292: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY, PART 2, ANNEX 2.B—DETERMINATION OF CORROSION RATES 2.B-13
2.B.3.5 Tables
Table 2.B.3.1—High Temperature Sulfidic and Naphthenic Acid
Corrosion—Basic Data Required for Analysis
Basic Data
Material of construction
Maximum temperature, (°C:°F)
Sulfur content of the stream
Total acid number (TAN)
(TAN = mg KOH/g oil sample)
Velocity
Comments
Determine the material of construction of the equipment/piping.
For 316 SS, if the Mo content is not known, assume it is < 2.5 wt%.
Determine the maximum temperature of the process stream.
Determine the sulfur content of the stream that is in this piece of equipment.
If sulfur content is not known, contact a knowledgeable process engineer
for an estimate.
The TAN of importance is that of the liquid hydrocarbon phase present in
the equipment/piping being evaluated. If not known, consult a
knowledgeable process engineer for an estimate.
Determine the maximum velocity in this equipment/piping. Although
conditions in a vessel may be essentially stagnant, the velocity in flowing
nozzles should be considered.