API RP 581 - 3rd Ed.2016 - Add.2-2020 - Risk-Based Inspection Methodology
2-146 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5813) Determined by chemical composition correlations. Use the chemical composition to determine theJ-factor or X-bar factor using Equation (2.71) and Equation (2.72). The J-factor and X-bar factormay be correlated to the expected ∆FATT after long-term service. Based on long-term exposures,this is conservatively correlated to the J-factor and X-bar factor in Equation (2.74) and Equation(2.75), respectively.4 2FATT 77. 321 (0. 57570 J-factor) (5.5147 (10 ) (J-factor ))∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ × (2.74)2FATT 87. 335 (11. 437 X-bar) (01472 . (X-bar ))∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ (2.75)4) Determined by using conservative assumptions based on year of fabrication. A conservative valueof can be assumed for the long term ∆FATT depending on the year of fabrication as follows:— fourth generation equipment (after to 1988): 66 °C (150 °F);— third generation equipment (1981 to 1987): 121 °C (250 °F);— second generation equipment (1973 to 1980): 149 °C (300 °F);— first generation equipment (1965 to 1972): 177 °C (350 °F).e) STEP 5—Calculate T ref + ∆FATT using T ref from STEP 3 and ∆FATT from STEP 4.f) STEP 6—Calculate the DF,tempeD fcondition and where T ref + ∆FATT is from STEP 5., using Table 20.4 or Table 20.5 based on the component PWHTNOTEUse T MPT – (T ref + ∆FATT) in place of CET − T ref with T MPT from STEP 1 or STEP 2, as applicable.21.7 Nomenclatureageis the in-service operating time, hourstempeD fis the DF for low alloy steel embrittlementSCET MDTT MPTT refYS∆FATTis the specified change in FATTis the minimum design temperature, °C (°F)is the minimum pressurization temperature, °C (°F)is the reference temperature, °C (°F)is the material yield strengthis the change in the fracture appearance transition temperature, °C for equations in thissection21.8 ReferencesSee References [76], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], and [90] in Section 2.2.
RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY, PART 2—PROBABILITY OF FAILURE METHODOLOGY 2-14721.9 TableTable 21.1—Data Required for Determination of the DF—Low Alloy Steel EmbrittlementRequired DataImpact test temperature, °C (°F)Administrative controls for upsetmanagement (Yes/No)Minimum operating temperature undernormal, start-up/shutdown, or upsetconditions, °C (°F)Time in service, years∆FATT, °C (°F)Chemical composition of steel (optional)Screening of materials (Y/N)SCE specified delta temperature, °C (°F)CommentsIf impact tested. If this is unknown, it should be assumed that impact testswere not done.Are there controls and or awareness training to prevent the coincidentoccurrence of low temperatures (upset) at or near design pressures?For low alloy steel embrittlement, this may be the temperature below whichthe operating pressure is reduced for purposes of fracture control. If notknown, the temperature should be set to the atmospheric boiling point ofthe fluid in the component if the fluid is a liquid.The number of years in service within the temperature range.The change in the fracture appearance transition temperature before andafter embrittlement.Specifically, the %Si, %Mn, %P, and %Sn for 2.25Cr-1Mo and 3Cr-1M0steels and the %P, %Sb, %Sn, and %As for 1.25Cr-1Mo and 1Cr-1Mosteels, which contribute to the susceptibility to low alloy steel embrittlement. Ifnot known, a transition shift will be assumed.Was the material used for the component screened for susceptibility to lowalloy steel embrittlement by such methods as specifications for steelcomposition or specification of a transition temperature requirement in astep cooling embrittlement (SCE) test.The delta temperature specified for SCE tests.
- Page 141 and 142: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 143 and 144: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 145 and 146: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 147 and 148: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 149 and 150: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 151 and 152: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 153 and 154: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 155 and 156: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 157 and 158: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 159 and 160: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 161 and 162: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 163 and 164: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 165 and 166: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 167 and 168: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 169 and 170: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 171 and 172: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 173 and 174: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 175 and 176: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 177 and 178: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 179 and 180: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 181 and 182: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 183 and 184: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 185 and 186: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 187 and 188: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 189 and 190: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 191: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 195 and 196: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 197 and 198: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 199 and 200: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 201 and 202: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 203 and 204: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 205 and 206: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 207 and 208: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 209 and 210: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 211 and 212: CONTENTSTABLE 2.A.1—LEADERSHIP AN
- Page 213 and 214: 2.A-2 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 215 and 216: 2.A-4 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 217 and 218: 2.A-6 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 219 and 220: 2.A-8 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581T
- Page 221 and 222: 2.A-10 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 223 and 224: 2.A-12 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 225 and 226: 2.A-14 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
- Page 227 and 228: PART 2, ANNEX 2.BDETERMINATION OF C
- Page 229 and 230: 2.B.8 AMINE CORROSION .............
- Page 231 and 232: Risk-Based Inspection MethodologyPa
- Page 233 and 234: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 235 and 236: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 237 and 238: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 239 and 240: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
- Page 241 and 242: RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY,
2-146 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581
3) Determined by chemical composition correlations. Use the chemical composition to determine the
J-factor or X-bar factor using Equation (2.71) and Equation (2.72). The J-factor and X-bar factor
may be correlated to the expected ∆FATT after long-term service. Based on long-term exposures,
this is conservatively correlated to the J-factor and X-bar factor in Equation (2.74) and Equation
(2.75), respectively.
4 2
FATT 77. 321 (0. 57570 J-factor) (5.
5147 (10 ) (J-factor ))
∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ × (2.74)
2
FATT 87. 335 (11. 437 X-bar) (01472 . (X-bar ))
∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ (2.75)
4) Determined by using conservative assumptions based on year of fabrication. A conservative value
of can be assumed for the long term ∆FATT depending on the year of fabrication as follows:
— fourth generation equipment (after to 1988): 66 °C (150 °F);
— third generation equipment (1981 to 1987): 121 °C (250 °F);
— second generation equipment (1973 to 1980): 149 °C (300 °F);
— first generation equipment (1965 to 1972): 177 °C (350 °F).
e) STEP 5—Calculate T ref + ∆FATT using T ref from STEP 3 and ∆FATT from STEP 4.
f) STEP 6—Calculate the DF,
tempe
D f
condition and where T ref + ∆FATT is from STEP 5.
, using Table 20.4 or Table 20.5 based on the component PWHT
NOTE
Use T MPT – (T ref + ∆FATT) in place of CET − T ref with T MPT from STEP 1 or STEP 2, as applicable.
21.7 Nomenclature
age
is the in-service operating time, hours
tempe
D f
is the DF for low alloy steel embrittlement
SCE
T MDT
T MPT
T ref
YS
∆FATT
is the specified change in FATT
is the minimum design temperature, °C (°F)
is the minimum pressurization temperature, °C (°F)
is the reference temperature, °C (°F)
is the material yield strength
is the change in the fracture appearance transition temperature, °C for equations in this
section
21.8 References
See References [76], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], and [90] in Section 2.2.