API RP 581 - 3rd Ed.2016 - Add.2-2020 - Risk-Based Inspection Methodology

luis.alberto.mayorga.plaza
from luis.alberto.mayorga.plaza More from this publisher
17.12.2020 Views

2-146 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 5813) Determined by chemical composition correlations. Use the chemical composition to determine theJ-factor or X-bar factor using Equation (2.71) and Equation (2.72). The J-factor and X-bar factormay be correlated to the expected ∆FATT after long-term service. Based on long-term exposures,this is conservatively correlated to the J-factor and X-bar factor in Equation (2.74) and Equation(2.75), respectively.4 2FATT 77. 321 (0. 57570 J-factor) (5.5147 (10 ) (J-factor ))∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ × (2.74)2FATT 87. 335 (11. 437 X-bar) (01472 . (X-bar ))∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ (2.75)4) Determined by using conservative assumptions based on year of fabrication. A conservative valueof can be assumed for the long term ∆FATT depending on the year of fabrication as follows:— fourth generation equipment (after to 1988): 66 °C (150 °F);— third generation equipment (1981 to 1987): 121 °C (250 °F);— second generation equipment (1973 to 1980): 149 °C (300 °F);— first generation equipment (1965 to 1972): 177 °C (350 °F).e) STEP 5—Calculate T ref + ∆FATT using T ref from STEP 3 and ∆FATT from STEP 4.f) STEP 6—Calculate the DF,tempeD fcondition and where T ref + ∆FATT is from STEP 5., using Table 20.4 or Table 20.5 based on the component PWHTNOTEUse T MPT – (T ref + ∆FATT) in place of CET − T ref with T MPT from STEP 1 or STEP 2, as applicable.21.7 Nomenclatureageis the in-service operating time, hourstempeD fis the DF for low alloy steel embrittlementSCET MDTT MPTT refYS∆FATTis the specified change in FATTis the minimum design temperature, °C (°F)is the minimum pressurization temperature, °C (°F)is the reference temperature, °C (°F)is the material yield strengthis the change in the fracture appearance transition temperature, °C for equations in thissection21.8 ReferencesSee References [76], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], and [90] in Section 2.2.

RISK-BASED INSPECTION METHODOLOGY, PART 2—PROBABILITY OF FAILURE METHODOLOGY 2-14721.9 TableTable 21.1—Data Required for Determination of the DF—Low Alloy Steel EmbrittlementRequired DataImpact test temperature, °C (°F)Administrative controls for upsetmanagement (Yes/No)Minimum operating temperature undernormal, start-up/shutdown, or upsetconditions, °C (°F)Time in service, years∆FATT, °C (°F)Chemical composition of steel (optional)Screening of materials (Y/N)SCE specified delta temperature, °C (°F)CommentsIf impact tested. If this is unknown, it should be assumed that impact testswere not done.Are there controls and or awareness training to prevent the coincidentoccurrence of low temperatures (upset) at or near design pressures?For low alloy steel embrittlement, this may be the temperature below whichthe operating pressure is reduced for purposes of fracture control. If notknown, the temperature should be set to the atmospheric boiling point ofthe fluid in the component if the fluid is a liquid.The number of years in service within the temperature range.The change in the fracture appearance transition temperature before andafter embrittlement.Specifically, the %Si, %Mn, %P, and %Sn for 2.25Cr-1Mo and 3Cr-1M0steels and the %P, %Sb, %Sn, and %As for 1.25Cr-1Mo and 1Cr-1Mosteels, which contribute to the susceptibility to low alloy steel embrittlement. Ifnot known, a transition shift will be assumed.Was the material used for the component screened for susceptibility to lowalloy steel embrittlement by such methods as specifications for steelcomposition or specification of a transition temperature requirement in astep cooling embrittlement (SCE) test.The delta temperature specified for SCE tests.

2-146 API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 581

3) Determined by chemical composition correlations. Use the chemical composition to determine the

J-factor or X-bar factor using Equation (2.71) and Equation (2.72). The J-factor and X-bar factor

may be correlated to the expected ∆FATT after long-term service. Based on long-term exposures,

this is conservatively correlated to the J-factor and X-bar factor in Equation (2.74) and Equation

(2.75), respectively.

4 2

FATT 77. 321 (0. 57570 J-factor) (5.

5147 (10 ) (J-factor ))

∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ × (2.74)

2

FATT 87. 335 (11. 437 X-bar) (01472 . (X-bar ))

∆ = − + ⋅ − ⋅ (2.75)

4) Determined by using conservative assumptions based on year of fabrication. A conservative value

of can be assumed for the long term ∆FATT depending on the year of fabrication as follows:

— fourth generation equipment (after to 1988): 66 °C (150 °F);

— third generation equipment (1981 to 1987): 121 °C (250 °F);

— second generation equipment (1973 to 1980): 149 °C (300 °F);

— first generation equipment (1965 to 1972): 177 °C (350 °F).

e) STEP 5—Calculate T ref + ∆FATT using T ref from STEP 3 and ∆FATT from STEP 4.

f) STEP 6—Calculate the DF,

tempe

D f

condition and where T ref + ∆FATT is from STEP 5.

, using Table 20.4 or Table 20.5 based on the component PWHT

NOTE

Use T MPT – (T ref + ∆FATT) in place of CET − T ref with T MPT from STEP 1 or STEP 2, as applicable.

21.7 Nomenclature

age

is the in-service operating time, hours

tempe

D f

is the DF for low alloy steel embrittlement

SCE

T MDT

T MPT

T ref

YS

∆FATT

is the specified change in FATT

is the minimum design temperature, °C (°F)

is the minimum pressurization temperature, °C (°F)

is the reference temperature, °C (°F)

is the material yield strength

is the change in the fracture appearance transition temperature, °C for equations in this

section

21.8 References

See References [76], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], and [90] in Section 2.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!