04.12.2020 Views

Boxoffice Pro - Winter 2020

Boxoffice Pro is the official publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

Boxoffice Pro is the official publication of the National Association of Theatre Owners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

showed was the advantages it gave to<br />

Sony, which was now the sole company<br />

controlling its films’ content, distribution<br />

channels, and the hardware with which<br />

people could watch movies at home (VCR,<br />

laser disks, etc.).<br />

Exhibition did not escape the M&A<br />

trend, despite the Paramount Decrees.<br />

Sony held the historic chain Loews, which<br />

was briefly renamed Sony Cinemas before<br />

switching back to its original name. Warner<br />

Communications and Gulf & Western<br />

formed Cineamerica Theaters, a corporate<br />

entity that took over Gulf & Western’s<br />

Mann Theaters, Festival Enterprises, and<br />

Trans-Lux circuits. Finally, MCA, the<br />

parent company of Universal, purchased a<br />

49 percent stake in Cineplex Odeon in 1986.<br />

While most acquisitions were not the<br />

subject of commentary by the editorial<br />

team, <strong>Boxoffice</strong> <strong>Pro</strong>’s new editor, Harley<br />

W. Lond (who took over in 1984 and<br />

implemented a significant overhaul that<br />

put more editorial emphasis on “vital<br />

analysis and interpretation” rather than<br />

straight news), deplored the trend. In<br />

an August 1989 editorial, he wrote, “The<br />

conglomeration fever in our industry<br />

has now moved from the acquisition of<br />

exhibition outlets to the acquisition of<br />

production outlets, and this does not augur<br />

well for us. Just recently, George Lucas<br />

bemoaned the rash corporate takeover<br />

by stating that such actions ‘damage the<br />

creative energies of the entertainment<br />

industry’ by creating companies with<br />

enormous debts, thus tying up resources<br />

that should be made available instead for<br />

risk-taking on new films, filmmakers, and<br />

new ideas.”<br />

The survival of smaller and<br />

independent theaters who struggled to<br />

stay afloat was at stake. <strong>Boxoffice</strong> <strong>Pro</strong><br />

dedicated a lot of space to independent<br />

distribution and exhibitors, publishing<br />

regular strategy columns and profiles of<br />

distributors and cinemas. A few indies<br />

managed to thrive, most notably New<br />

Line Cinema with the hit A Nightmare<br />

on Elm Street and Miramax with Sex, Lies,<br />

and Videotape, as well as exhibitors like<br />

Carmike Cinemas, Pacific Theaters, and<br />

the Laemmle chain. But as Dan Harkins,<br />

president of Arizona’s Harkins Theaters,<br />

put it in December 1987, independents<br />

were still “facing extinction” because<br />

of conglomerate buy ups. Independent<br />

exhibitors were at the forefront of the<br />

fight against integration, often pushing<br />

for resolutions through NATO. In<br />

fact, <strong>Boxoffice</strong> <strong>Pro</strong> reported that in<br />

August 1987, Dan Harkins, as well as<br />

other exhibitors from Texas and Indiana,<br />

appeared in front of New York’s District<br />

Court to prevent Tri-Star from having<br />

the right to book its films into its Loews<br />

cinemas. Despite their efforts, the court<br />

granted Tri-Star its request.<br />

Home Entertainment, VCR Wars,<br />

and MTV<br />

Vertical concentration was not the only<br />

challenge facing the exhibition industry<br />

in the 1980s. Editor Alexander Auerbach<br />

had summed up the threat of home<br />

entertainment in a March 1981 editorial.<br />

“Exhibition and the studios, which once<br />

feared the advent of television, now<br />

ponder on the impact of cable TV,<br />

pay-TV, the videodisc, and videotape,<br />

direct broadcast from satellite to home<br />

and other technological advances. All<br />

of this new gadgetry can be regarded as<br />

either an opportunity or a threat, but<br />

in either case, it cannot be ignored,” he<br />

argued. As had happened since the advent<br />

of TV in the ’50s, theaters were competing<br />

for the scarce time, attention, and cash<br />

of a moviegoing audience that now had<br />

a seemingly never-ending bounty of<br />

home alternatives.<br />

One significant threat in home<br />

entertainment was the rapid quality<br />

improvements in TV screens and surround<br />

systems at home. Echoing the race to<br />

large formats in the ’50s, as readers of<br />

this column might remember, Tony<br />

Francis, president of Theater <strong>Pro</strong>ducts<br />

International and regular <strong>Boxoffice</strong> <strong>Pro</strong><br />

contributor, lamented in May 1981 that<br />

“the picture only offers size.” He feared<br />

that although the quality of TV pictures<br />

was inferior to film, it would soon surpass<br />

<strong>Winter</strong> <strong>2020</strong><br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!