19.11.2020 Views

History of Loriga - History of Loriga by the historian António Conde on Wikipedia

History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal

History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[ Infelizmente concretizaram-se as previsões deste grande Loriguense sobre

a evolução da situação da vila de Loriga e região envolvente, que desde a

década de oitenta do século XX motivaram os seus alertas e as suas

sugestões em muitos dos artigos que escreveu em imprensa local, regional e

nacional, e divulgados em diversos sites. Só entre 1989 e 2015, a vila de

Loriga perdeu mais de metade da população, e está mais do que na hora de

pedir contas áqueles que, por estupidez, inveja e ou conveniência ( politica

e não só ), desdenharam e criticaram os alertas e as coerentes sugestões de

António Conde.

No entanto, apesar da situação catastrófica, a estupidez e a incompetência

continuam a imperar, e continua o rumo para o abismo, leia-se a

desertificação total da vila de Loriga e das aldeias envolventes. ]

Quando o historiador António Conde disse que a ilustração usada

formalmente como “brasão” pela autarquia de Loriga é ilegal e não respeita

as regras da heráldica portuguesa e apresentou soluções, eis que surgiram

as reacções de indignação dos ignorantes, e daqueles que sem carácter se

aproveitaram dessa ignorância. Alguns, sabendo que António Conde sempre

teve razão promoveram a ignorância e aproveitaram-se da ignorância dos

que nada sabem em relação á questão da heráldica e, usando a

desinformação, a calúnia, o insulto, e usando todos os meios sujos,

envenenaram a opinião pública contra este grande Loriguense. Perante

todos, apresentaram António Conde como sendo inimigo de Loriga,

mentiroso, desonesto, maldicente, etc, atuação que atingiu contornos

gravíssimos porque envolveu gente com responsabilidades autárquicas!!

Gente com responsabilidades autárquicas que devia ser a primeira

interessada em resolver de forma competente a questão da heráldica,

defendendo assim a imagem de Loriga, a imagem dos loriguenses e a

imagem da Junta de Freguesia de Loriga, mas em vez disso têm feito

exatamente o contrário!! Como se não bastasse esta gente ter usado todos

os meios sujos para negar o problema, impedir a sua resolução e

desacreditar António Conde, quando começou a ser desmascarada e já não

podia esconder a verdade, arranjou dois brasões insultuosos em 2002 e em

2018 respetivamente, indignos desta vila, detestados pelos loriguenses e

que confirmam o desprezo que esta gente sempre teve pela imagem de

Loriga e pela questão da heráldica!!

Quando o historiador António Conde escrevia no jornal Garganta de Loriga

sobre a história e as origens lusitanas desta vila, a muito antiga tradição de

ter sido berço de Viriato, e sugeriu um evento que comemorasse tudo isso,

eis que surgiram as reações de chacota dos invejosos ignorantes.

Quando ele escrevia sobre as origens lusitanas, sobre Loriga vila lusitana e

sobre Viriato, lá vinham os pseudohistoriadores e outros burros invejosos,

incluindo alguns que dizem ter passado pelo ensino superior, com os

comentários depreciativos. E tal como sempre foi defendido por António

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!