History of Loriga - History of Loriga by the historian António Conde on Wikipedia
History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal
Esta heráldica desenhada por António Conde noséculo passado, e aprovada pelas autoridadescompetentes, é e continua a ser a melhor para estavila, e o melhor brasão de Loriga. Este é e continua aser o brasão de Loriga e essa realidade só terminaráse aparecer outro que seja mais bonito e maisrepresentativo, portanto que seja uma melhoralternativa.
Saiba mais (clique aqui) aqui neste documento PDFsobre a vergonhosa questão da heráldica: Historia-Do-Brasao-Da-Vila-De-Loriga-Pequeno-Resumo-Do-Processo Saiba mais (clique aqui) aqui nestedocumento PDF sobre a vergonhosa questão daheráldica: Historia-Do-Brasao-Da-Vila-De-Loriga-Pequeno-Resumo-Do-Processo
- Page 1391 and 1392: ( In blog Dizer Bem, artigo escrito
- Page 1393 and 1394: duzentos anos. Apesar dos discursos
- Page 1395 and 1396: elogios públicos no jornal Gargant
- Page 1397 and 1398: escolhido pelo Zeca Maria e acólit
- Page 1399 and 1400: Doutor de Albarda, o Gaiteiro, e os
- Page 1401 and 1402: da vila. A propósito recorda-se a
- Page 1403 and 1404: mesquinhas pessoais á frente dos i
- Page 1405 and 1406: aponta para uma localidade que est
- Page 1407 and 1408: extratos da obra de António Conde
- Page 1409 and 1410: inimigos, esta gente é mais do que
- Page 1411 and 1412: interesses mesquinhos pessoais acim
- Page 1413 and 1414: corretas como daqueles que simplesm
- Page 1435 and 1436: Além do brasão em uso estas são
- Page 1437 and 1438: Na imagem está a mais conhecida do
- Page 1439 and 1440: Nesta foto de Loriga pode ver-se um
- Page 1441: estrela de cinco pontas, também de
- Page 1445 and 1446: antigo concelho de Loriga na sua fa
- Page 1447 and 1448: Pombal esteve em Loriga a avaliar o
- Page 1449 and 1450: Geografia romana em PortugalLigaç
- Page 1451 and 1452: antigo concelho de Loriga na sua fa
- Page 1453 and 1454: Pombal esteve em Loriga a avaliar o
- Page 1455 and 1456: Ligações externasFontesHomepage s
- Page 1457 and 1458: Loriga - Wikipédia, a enciclopédi
- Page 1459 and 1460: Loriga - Wikipédia, a enciclopédi
- Page 1461 and 1462: origa - Wikipédia, a enciclopédia
- Page 1463 and 1464: LorigaFrom Wikipedia, the free ency
- Page 1465 and 1466: Edited with the trial version ofFox
- Page 1467 and 1468: Página Web 2 de 4http://en.wikiped
- Page 1469 and 1470: Página Web 4 de 4http://en.wikiped
- Page 1471 and 1472: Página Web 2 de 4http://en.wikiped
- Page 1473 and 1474: Página Web 4 de 4http://en.wikiped
- Page 1475 and 1476: - 2 -- coordinates40°19'13.69?N 7
- Page 1477 and 1478: Liberals, during the Portuguese Lib
- Page 1479 and 1480: - 6 -• View historyActionsSearchN
- Page 1481 and 1482: - 1 -LorigaFrom Wikipedia, the free
- Page 1483 and 1484: - 3 -[edit] HistoryThe remaining Ro
- Page 1485 and 1486: - 5 -Vodafone Ski Resort, Serra da
- Page 1487 and 1488: - 7 -• About Wikipedia• Disclai
- Page 1489 and 1490: - locationLargo da Fonte do Mouro,
- Page 1491 and 1492: century.[1] Only Covilhã out-prefo
Esta heráldica desenhada por António Conde no
século passado, e aprovada pelas autoridades
competentes, é e continua a ser a melhor para esta
vila, e o melhor brasão de Loriga. Este é e continua a
ser o brasão de Loriga e essa realidade só terminará
se aparecer outro que seja mais bonito e mais
representativo, portanto que seja uma melhor
alternativa.