19.11.2020 Views

History of Loriga - History of Loriga by the historian António Conde on Wikipedia

History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal

History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

nem jamais poderá ser o brasão de Loriga, e tentarem

apagar o rasto do autor dos artigos por ele se opor a

essa ilegalidade. Entretanto, quando o historiador

António Conde foi retirado das fontes do artigo, os

vândalos foram desafiados e há muito tempo a

provarem a origem dos dados históricos presentes no

artigo, e que hipocritamente não apagaram, e de

forma hilariante e contraditória dizem que não são

credíveis e que não foi o historiador António Conde

que os pesquisou. Mas, apesar de não os acharem

credíveis não os apagaram, foi um qualquer editor

“fantasma” que os pesquisou e colocou no artigo, e

obviamente nunca provaram a origem dos dados nem

podem fazê-lo porque foi o historiador António

Conde, autor do artigo, quem os pesquisou e colocou,

ao contrário do que é dito pelos vândalos e por quem

eles promovem de forma ilegítima, incluindo o ladrão

de créditos sem caráter, conhecido por Fariseu

Alemão, cúmplice na vergonhosa questão da

heráldica que tem arrasado a imagem de Loriga, e

que por isso passaram a incluir nas fontes do artigo.

Artigo que passou a estar constantemente e

cobardemente bloqueado porque, sem surpresa, os

vândalos têm medo da verdade. Se os dados são

credíveis e não foi o historiador António Conde que os

pesquisou quem fez a pesquisa coloque as fontes no

artigo, e já agora retirem das fontes quem não tem

nada a ver com o artigo, e se os dados não são

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!