19.11.2020 Views

History of Loriga - History of Loriga by the historian António Conde on Wikipedia

History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal

History of Loriga - Wikipedia article created by the historian António Conde. The efficient, though discreet, research and dissemination work that the historian and our great loriguense António Conde has been doing for decades, has borne many fruits, and much of the information about Loriga released there is due to the initiative of this great Loriguense. This great Loriguense researches the history of Loriga for about 30 years, at the expense of much sacrifice and many personal expenses, creating a rich work, which can be read extracts on many sites, including articles on Loriga in English and Portuguese that he created on Wikipedia. António Conde acts, does, criticizes what is badly always presenting solutions, loves his land passionately and is allergic to hypocrisy and vanity fairs. This article was vandalized with the main objectives of introducing an illegal and non-representative “coat of arms” of Loriga, and erasing from the sources the author of this article because he opposes for this illegality to affect the image of this town and of the own Wikipedia. However the illegal heraldic aberration was finally removed from the article in 2017, failing to restore in the sources the links that point to the author of the same and correct the other errors introduced. This edition has already been reversed to hide the truth, which in fact has happened more than ten years. History of Loriga, excerpts from the work of the historian António Conde on Wikipedia . The vandals, the ones who deliberately and insistently put up mistakes and lies, were challenged to prove the origin of the historical data found in the Wikipedia article created by António Conde, and we can all sit around because only the one who did the research can say where got the data. It is hilarious that the vandals and who they support and promote, call into question historical data while claiming they have not been surveyed by António Conde. Decide once and for all; If the data is credible and the research is not from him who did it reveal the sources of the historical data, or if they are not credible delete them. Do not be jealous and mean, do not make sad figures, and stop harming the image of Loriga and the Loriguenses! More about Loriga: http://freguesiadeloriga.net, http://lorigaportugal.webnode.com , http://sites.google.com/view/loriga , http://loriga4.webnode.pt , http://loriga.wikidot.com , http://sites.google.com/view/lorigaportugal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A estrela de ouro de sete pontas é a que historicamente melhor representa

esta bela e histórica vila, mas pode ser substituída pela comum estrela de cinco

pontas, também de ouro, e isso foi feito no brasão de Loriga. Quem conhece a

história e a identidade de Loriga sabe que muitas coisas justificam a existência

de uma estrela no brasão da vila, porém a quem não conhece mas tem um QI

minimamente aceitável basta dizer que Loriga está localizada no coração da

Serra da Estrela na qual e da qual é uma estrela. Quem não tem um QI

minimamente aceitável nem sabe o que é a heráldica nem qual é a função da

heráldica, diz que o brasão de Loriga não precisa da estrela. Dizer que o brasão

de Loriga não precisa de ter uma estrela é como dizer que o brasão de Portugal

não precisa de ter a esfera armilar porque, como todos sabem que os

portugueses são um povo de descobridores não é preciso colocá-la no brasão.

Esta “lógica” sem sentido poderia ser aplicada a qualquer das outras peças que

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!