Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts
Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts
State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668, 719, 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008, 118 S. Ct. 1193, 140 L,Ed. 2d 323 (1998) ...................................................... ........ 32 ......... State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 661, 790 P.2d 610 (1990) 32 ....................... State v. Tatum, 74 Wn. App. 81, 86. 871 P.2d 1123 (1994) 45 ..................... State v. Thomas, 150 Wn.2d 821, 856, 83 P.3d 970 (2004), review granted in part, 163 Wn.2d 1033, 187 P.3d 269 (2008) ................................................ 14,22, 24,27, 28,31 State v. Tigano, 63 Wn. App. 336, 344-45, 818 P.2d 1369 (1991)........... 25 State v. Torres, I I I Wn. App. 323, 330, 44 P.3d 903 (2002) 37 ................... State v. Williams, 104 Wn. App. 516, 17 P.3d 648 (200 1) 39, ........... 43, 44 State v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 774, 168 P.3d 359 (2007) 33 ........................ State v. Young, 158 Wn. App. 707,243 P.3d, 172, 179 (2010).......... 14, 22 Federal and Other Jurisdictions Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541, 557, 82 S. Ct. 955, 8 L. Ed. 2d 834 (1962) ........................................................................... 33 Washington v. Texas, 388 U. S. 14, 87 S. Ct. 1920, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1019 (1967) ......................................................................... 23 Constitutional Provisions Art. 1, § 22 (amend. 10), of the Washington Constitution......................... 23 Sixth Amendment of the Federal Constitution ............. 23 ............................. Statutes RCW10.58. 090 .............................. 3
Rules and Regulations CrR3. 3 .......................................................... .............................1, 36, 40, 48 CrR3.3( b)( 1) ........................ 37 CrR3.3( b)( 5) ........................ 40, 47 CrR3.3( e) ............... 37 CrR3.3( e)( 3) f) & .................................. ( 37, 40 CrR3. 3( f) ........................................................ 37 CrR3. 3( f)( 2) ................................................................. 46 ........................ CrR3.3( h) ............... 48 ER401 .......................................................................... 23 ............................. ER402 .......................................................................... 23 ............................. ER404 ........................................................................... 3.............................. RAP9. 2( b) .................................................................... 44 ....................... VI
- Page 1 and 2: 930 Tacoma Avenue South Room 946 Ta
- Page 3 and 4: 2. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DENIED
- Page 5: State v. Gregory, 158 Wn.2d 759, 84
- Page 9 and 10: The court originally set Defendant'
- Page 11 and 12: State made a similar motion, RP 74-
- Page 13 and 14: 522-43, Elizabeth Wendell, RP 543-6
- Page 15 and 16: RP 339, 341. She testified that she
- Page 17 and 18: touching to S.D. RP 428-29. She tol
- Page 19 and 20: witnesses and arranged for a forens
- Page 21 and 22: C. ARGUMENT. 1. THE TRIAL COURT PRO
- Page 23 and 24: expansive view of claims that testi
- Page 25 and 26: Therefore, communicating to the jur
- Page 27 and 28: held that testimony describing "[t]
- Page 29 and 30: 2. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DENIED
- Page 31 and 32: To be relevant, evidence must meet
- Page 33 and 34: RP 257. See RP 254-58, 261-62, 283-
- Page 35 and 36: ecollection of that molestation, an
- Page 37 and 38: mention of the rape-shield statute
- Page 39 and 40: 3. THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO MEET
- Page 41 and 42: the issues in the case, the evidenc
- Page 43 and 44: indicator for child sexual abuse."
- Page 45 and 46: emphasis added). T]he decision to g
- Page 47 and 48: and judges." Kenyon, 167 Wn.2d at 1
- Page 49 and 50: untenable reasons, "' State v. Flin
- Page 51 and 52: obtained via in camera review." CP
- Page 53 and 54: At that July 19, 2010 motion, the d
- Page 55 and 56: and judges at the time of that cont
<strong>State</strong> v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668, 719,<br />
940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008, 118 S. Ct. 1193,<br />
140 L,Ed. 2d 323 (1998) ...................................................... ........ 32 .........<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 661, 790 P.2d 610 (1990) 32<br />
.......................<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Tatum, 74 Wn. App. 81, 86. 871 P.2d 1123 (1994) 45 .....................<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Thomas, 150 Wn.2d 821, 856, 83 P.3d 970 (2004), review<br />
granted in part, 163 Wn.2d 1033,<br />
187 P.3d 269 (2008) ................................................ 14,22, 24,27, 28,31<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Tigano, 63 Wn. App. 336, 344-45, 818 P.2d 1369 (1991)........... 25<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Torres, I I I Wn. App. 323, 330, 44 P.3d 903 (2002) 37 ...................<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Williams, 104 Wn. App. 516, 17 P.3d 648 (200 1) 39, ........... 43, 44<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 774, 168 P.3d 359 (2007) 33<br />
........................<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Young, 158 Wn. App. 707,243 P.3d, 172, 179 (2010).......... 14, 22<br />
Federal and Other Jurisdictions<br />
Beck v. <strong>Washington</strong>, 369 U.S. 541, 557, 82 S. Ct. 955,<br />
8 L. Ed. 2d 834 (1962) ...........................................................................<br />
33<br />
<strong>Washington</strong> v. Texas, 388 U. S. 14, 87 S. Ct. 1920,<br />
18 L.Ed. 2d 1019 (1967) .........................................................................<br />
23<br />
Constitutional Provisions<br />
Art. 1, § 22 (amend. 10), of the <strong>Washington</strong> Constitution......................... 23<br />
Sixth Amendment of the Federal Constitution ............. 23<br />
.............................<br />
Statutes<br />
RCW10.58. 090 ..............................<br />
3
Change language