Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts
Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts
Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D. CONCLUSION.<br />
The trial court properly admitted the testimony of Cornelia Thomas<br />
because such testimony did not constitute improper opinion testimony on<br />
the veracity of the victims.<br />
The trial court properly denied Defendant's motion to admit<br />
evidence of the victim's mother's drug and vocational history as not<br />
relevant.<br />
The defendant has failed to meet his burden of showing either<br />
prosecutorial misconduct or that the unchallenged argument at issue was<br />
flagrant andill-intentioned.<br />
affirmed,<br />
Finally, the trial court properly granted the trial continuances.<br />
Therefore, the trial court and defendant's conviction should be<br />
DATED: March 13, 2012.<br />
MARK UNDQUIST<br />
Pierce County<br />
Prosecuting Attorney<br />
Brian Wasankari<br />
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney<br />
WSB # 28945<br />
49 - optest-prosmiscsptrialmcdaniel,doc