Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts

Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts Respondent's Brief - Washington State Courts

courts.wa.gov
from courts.wa.gov More from this publisher
23.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents A, ISSUES PERTAINING TO APPELLANT'S ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR I ..... 1. Whether the trial court properly admitted the testimony of Cornelia Thomas where such testimony provided the necessary context that enabled the jury to assess the reasonableness of the victim's interview responses and did not constitute improper opinion testimony on the veracity of thevictim .................................................... ......................... I 2. Whether the trial court properly denied Defendant's motion to admit evidence of the victim's mother's drug and vocational history as not relevant, ........................................ I 3. Whether the defendant has failed to meet his burden of showing either prosecutorial misconduct or that the unchallenged argument at issue was flagrant and illintentioned. ............................. ....................................... 4. Whether the trial court properly granted the trial continuances where those continuances did not violate Defendant's rights to speedy trial as protected by the time for trial provisions of CrR 3.3 ................ 1.............................. B. STATEMENT OF THE CASE . ............................ ........ ............... I 1. Procedure .............................................................................. I 2. Facts ......................................................... ........................... 7 C. ARGUMENT ..... ........................................................... ....... 14 ....... 1. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY ADMITTED THE TESTIMONY OF CORNELIA THOMAS BECAUSE SUCH TESTIMONY PROVIDED THE NECESSARY CONTEXT THAT ENABLED THE JURY TO ACCESS THE REASONABLENESS OF THE VICTIM'S INTERVIEW RESPONSES AND DID NOT CONSTITUTE IMPROPER OPINION TESTIMONY ON THE VERACITY OF THE VICTIM .............. .................. 14 1 -

2. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DENIED DEFENDANT'S, MOTION TO ADMIT EVIDENCE OF THE VICTIM'S MOTHER'S DRUG AND VOCATIONAL HISTORY AS NOT RELEVANT .......... 22 3. THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO MEET HIS BURDEN OF SHOWING EITHER PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OR THAT THE UNCHALLENGED ARGUMENT AT ISSUE WAS FLAGRANT AND ILL- INTENTIONED ...................... .......................... ............... 32 4 THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY GRANTED THE TRIAL CONTINUANCES BECAUSE THOSE CONTINUANCES DID NOT VIOLATE DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS TO SPEEDY TRIAL AS PROTECTED BY THE TIME FOR TRIAL PROVISIONS OF CRR 3,3. 14 . ......... 36 D. CONCLUSION . ................................... .................... ................... 49

Table of Contents<br />

A, ISSUES PERTAINING TO APPELLANT'S ASSIGNMENTS OF<br />

ERROR I .....<br />

1. Whether the trial court properly admitted the testimony of<br />

Cornelia Thomas where such testimony provided the<br />

necessary context that enabled the jury to assess the<br />

reasonableness of the victim's interview responses and did<br />

not constitute improper opinion testimony on the veracity of<br />

thevictim .................................................... ......................... I<br />

2. Whether the trial court properly denied Defendant's motion<br />

to admit evidence of the victim's mother's drug and<br />

vocational history as not relevant, ........................................ I<br />

3. Whether the defendant has failed to meet his burden of<br />

showing either prosecutorial misconduct or that the<br />

unchallenged argument at issue was flagrant and illintentioned.<br />

............................. .......................................<br />

4. Whether the trial court properly granted the trial<br />

continuances where those continuances did not violate<br />

Defendant's rights to speedy trial as protected by the time<br />

for trial provisions of CrR 3.3 ................ 1..............................<br />

B. STATEMENT OF THE CASE . ............................ ........ ............... I<br />

1. Procedure .............................................................................. I<br />

2. Facts ......................................................... ........................... 7<br />

C. ARGUMENT ..... ........................................................... ....... 14 .......<br />

1. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY ADMITTED THE<br />

TESTIMONY OF CORNELIA THOMAS BECAUSE<br />

SUCH TESTIMONY PROVIDED THE NECESSARY<br />

CONTEXT THAT ENABLED THE JURY TO ACCESS<br />

THE REASONABLENESS OF THE VICTIM'S<br />

INTERVIEW RESPONSES AND DID NOT<br />

CONSTITUTE IMPROPER OPINION TESTIMONY ON<br />

THE VERACITY OF THE VICTIM .............. .................. 14<br />

1 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!