23.12.2012 Views

2003 - SSAAM

2003 - SSAAM

2003 - SSAAM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

General Considerations<br />

When to Assess<br />

Guidelines for Cognitive Evaluation<br />

June, <strong>2003</strong><br />

In our work in the context of the school system, a complete evaluation of a child should<br />

begin with a comprehensive academic assessment by the school's support team and<br />

classroom teacher and attempts to address the child's needs by a variety of approaches<br />

including but not limited to differentiating the instructional strategies. The Clinician can<br />

consult regarding these activities but only when such efforts leave unanswered questions<br />

should the process proceed to a formal psychological evaluation.<br />

Why to Assess<br />

It is the School Psychologist's job to describe, as completely as possible, the child's<br />

circumstances in relation to educational functioning. The holistic ecological approach we<br />

support includes an assessment of intellectual, adaptive, social-emotional and behavioural<br />

functioning, as well as personality, mental health, family and community relations. This<br />

can be achieved with the Psychologist providing either comprehensive data or more<br />

limited input as part of a Team Evaluation. However accomplished, the goal of these<br />

evaluations is to provide information useful in programming effectively to improve the<br />

child's opportunity for success in school and in life. It is not to generate a set of numbers<br />

in isolation in order to garner grant funds. It is the role of others in the system to<br />

determine if the child meets criteria for categorical funding or inclusion in a specific<br />

program, be it Divisional (e.g., placement in a segregated Special Education Centre) or<br />

Provincial (e.g., acceptance into the Inter-Divisional Program for Students with Autism).<br />

How to Report<br />

The same reporting guidelines apply to school reports, Manitoba Education and Youth<br />

Level 2 and Level 3 funding applications, as well as applications to Vocational<br />

Rehabilitation and Supported Community Living. In all CGC Psychology reports,<br />

single I.Q. scores, single number percentiles or age equivalents are not provided. If<br />

formal testing was completed, the ranges of the three summary scores (Full Scale,<br />

Verbal and Performance) and the appropriate descriptive terms provide the necessary<br />

information for the responsible parties to make educational support or placement<br />

decisions. Provision of ranges also protects against the reification of the specific I.Q.<br />

numbers in favour of the clinical judgment expressed. In every case, the Psychologist's<br />

opinion needs to be based on a thorough review of the historical evidence available, as<br />

well as an understanding of the child's current circumstances. The evidence supporting<br />

the Psychologist's opinion needs to be referenced in the report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!