16.10.2020 Views

Global IP Matrix - Issue 8

Dear Readers We are delighted to present you with issue 8 of The Global IP Matrix magazine! Once again, we have fantastic content delivered to you by industry professionals who are experts in their field. This issue explores IP & Innovation in Africa, anti-counterfeiting measures in the Caribbean, IPR Infringement in China, plus many more engaging articles around the IP ecosystem. It's been a challenging few months; however, we are grateful that our clients and contributors share our vision. Together, we are heading for better times. We cannot thank our authors enough for their time and efforts to keep you, our audience up to date with news and stories from their own perspective and expertise. Look out for our next edition, in January 2021 and until then, stay safe, healthy & happy. Elvin Hassan – Editor

Dear Readers

We are delighted to present you with issue 8 of The Global IP Matrix magazine!

Once again, we have fantastic content delivered to you by industry professionals who are experts in their field.

This issue explores IP & Innovation in Africa, anti-counterfeiting measures in the Caribbean, IPR Infringement in China, plus many more engaging articles around the IP ecosystem.

It's been a challenging few months; however, we are grateful that our clients and contributors share our vision. Together, we are heading for better times.

We cannot thank our authors enough for their time and efforts to keep you, our audience up to date with news and stories from their own perspective and expertise.

Look out for our next edition, in January 2021 and until then, stay safe, healthy & happy.

Elvin Hassan – Editor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scan the QR code and

listen to our latest issue

in audio Format!

b. Licencing

Section 51 of the Copyright Act defined

broadcast as sound or television broadcast

by wireless telegraph or wire or both, or by

satellite or cable programmes and includes

re-broadcast.

The National Broadcasting Commission

Act of Nigeria, LFN 2004, in section 2 gave

powers to the commission to receive, process,

consider applications for the establishment,

ownership, or operation of radio and

television stations, including cable television

services, direct satellite broadcast, and any

It would appear that the NBC Act covers

internet channels since the use of the internet

is made possible by satellites/WIFI, cables, etc.

Even Android phones or Phone Apps used in

watching cinematograph films survive by data,

WIFI, Satellite, etc. Also, the broadcast has

been defined to include re-broadcast.

The 2016 NBC Code is under review and said

to be undergoing the Presidential approval. It

is believed that the review would affect non-

Nigerian broadcast channels like Netflix and

Amazon Prime so that these entities would

require a licence as well.

photographs; whereas the WPPT deals with

protection for authors rights of performers

and producers of phonograms. Both Treaties

require countries to provide a framework

for the protection of those fundamental IP

rights over the internet. Right-holders should

effectively use technology (i.e., encryption

and other anti-circumvention) to protect their

rights and give licence of their works online.

Unfortunately, the Treaties do not cover the

field. Signal piracy takes various forms. It

could be physical or virtual; an unauthorised

redistribution of signals online is possible

through hacking into encrypted pay-tv signals

Intellectual Property News Direct From the Source!

Power is gained by sharing knowledge, not hoarding it.

To share your news, views and stories. Contact us today.

info@gipmatrix.com ot call +44 (0)203 813 0457

www.gipmatrix.com

other medium of broadcasting. No person

can operate in any of the mentioned services

unless by the provisions of the Act. It is to be

noted that NBC is precluded from granting

a license to religious bodies and political

parties.

Of interest is section 9 of the NBC Act; it

states that the commission must be satisfied

that the applicant is a body corporate

registered under the company and allied

matters Act or owned by the Federal

State, or Local Government. In addition,

the applicant must demonstrate to the

Commission’s satisfaction that he is not

applying on behalf of foreign interest, and can

comply with the objectives of the National

Mass Communication Policy as applies to

the electronic media, that is, radio and

television.

This above provision brings much confusion

as to whether or not online streaming falls

under broadcast to be regulated by the NBC.

Hence, the making of the NBC Code to spell

out the confines of the NBC powers.

According to the National Broadcasting

Commission Code (6th edition 2016), chapter

11:15:1 to 11:15:5 of the NBC Code provides:

An Internet radio, or television

broadcaster streaming signals from Nigeria

shall be licenced by the Commission. All

regulations governing news, programmes,

advertising, and sponsorship shall apply

to this category of broadcasting. The local

content for this category of a licence shall

be 60 percent. All conditions governing

other categories of the broadcast license

shall apply to this category of broadcasting.

All subscription internet radio, and

television that seek subscribers in Nigeria

shall be licensed by the Commission.

c. Assignment/

procurement

Copyrights are considered moveable property

capable of transfer. As such, instead of going

through the difficulties of sourcing and royalty

payment issues, a streaming company can

simply procure the entire ownership rights in

a work just like Netflix bought ‘Lion Heart”

from Genevieve Nnaji. Such a method comes

with great expense, but much more is to be

recovered if the content is worth it.

In such situations, the original author must

always be mentioned, and the integrity of the

work left intact, but ownership would rest on

the company. The owner may then use such

content as they please, including the right to

licence the same at a price to other bodies.

The contract must be appropriately worded

and made to cover every intellectual property

derivable in the work.

3. Trouble From

International Realm

a. International Treaties

The World Intellectual Property Organisation

(WIPO) administers the WIPO Copyright

Treaty (WCT), the WIPO Performances and

Phonogram Treaty (WPPT). Both treaties,

which became referred to as the ‘Internet

Treaties’ 1996, set down international norms

for accessing and using creative works on

the internet/digital networks. These treaties

serve as an update to the existing Berne

Convention, Rome Convention, and by

extension, TRIPS. The WCT deals with

protection for authors of literary and artistic

works, such as writings and computer

programs; original databases; musical works;

audio-visual works; works of fine art and

www.gipmatrix.com

in set-top boxes. An example is live sports

broadcasts. Sports stakeholders are lamenting

over a considerable loss of millions of dollars

of income. The Internet Treaties were found

wanting in the face of new broadcasting

technologies. Digital programme recording

devices, VOD (video on demand) services,

Internet Protocol TV (OPTV or Internet TV)

are all disruptive means that can transmit

programmes to televisions and computers and

mobile phones.

The discussion in WIPO as of 2006 on

webcasting, that is, broadcast over the

internet or video content intended for

internet streaming, yielded no result. There

were concerns regarding blocking legal uses

of a TV broadcast, streaming for personal,

scientific, and educational uses, inhibition

of technological innovation, an extension of

allowed years of protection, and interruption

of specific domestic laws.

b. Experience from

Developed Countries

Article 3 of The Harmonisation of Certain

Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in

the Information Society (European Union)

mandates certain requirements for online

streaming services - Authors shall have

the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit

any communication to the public of their

works, by wire or wireless means, including

the making available to the public of their

works in such a way that members of the

public may access them from a place and at

a time individually chosen by them. Also,

it stipulates that ‘the rights referred to in

paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not be exhausted by

any act of communication to the public or

making available to the public as set out in

this Article.’

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!