YSM Issue 93.2

yalescientific
from yalescientific More from this publisher
06.10.2020 Views

FOCUSEcologyTHE ROLE OFIN PLANTHow does soil organic matter help crop growth?BY CINDY KUANGDeath, SOM, and SoilDeath often stays in the soil. Over time,organisms and residues in varyingstates of decomposition form a vitalcomponent of the soil: soil organic matter(SOM). SOM has always been thought of asan indicator of soil fertility, contributing tohealthier soil and better crop growth. Thus,building SOM, or raising its levels through theaddition of compost or manure, is assumed tobe a cost-effective way of reducing relianceon external inputs such as fertilization andirrigation. But how well are the effects ofSOM actually understood? In various studies,higher SOM has been shown to correlate withboth higher and lower productivity, so untilnow, the effects of added SOM on soil fertilityare inconsistent and unclear.The question is further complicated bythe possibility that this causative pathway isbidirectional: Does SOM lead to increasedcrop productivity, or do increased plantinputs lead to higher SOM levels? In orderto figure out this relationship between SOM,agricultural inputs, and productivity, weneed to be able to isolate and investigateSOM’s effect on plant growth. Emily Oldfield,a postdoctoral fellow at the Yale School ofForestry and Environmental Studies, worksin the Bradford lab to study SOM’s effects. “Alot of the policies that are being put forth byorganizations like the USDA, the Food andAgriculture organization rest on the premiseof the more organic matter, the better, butthere’s really no hard quantification of howmuch more and how much better,” Oldfieldsaid. “The goal of my research was to try toput some numbers behind it.” She describedthis greenhouse study as an effort to usea controlled environment to establish acausative pathway between SOM and cropproductivity.What is soil?Soil itself is a complex mixture of elements,consisting of around forty-five percentminerals, (including sand, silt, clay) and fiftypercent air and water. In particular, plantsrequire nitrogen more than any other nutrient,but they can only take up mineral forms of it,including nitrate and ammonia, which onlymake up two percent of the nitrogen in soil.The other ninety-eight percent of nitrogen isorganic and inaccessible to plants, meaningmany farmers rely on mineral N-fertilizer tofacilitate crop growth.The remaining five percent of soilcomposition is soil organic matter—anythingthat was once living. Though SOM is a verysmall percentage by volume, its influence isdisproportionately large. SOM dictates thestructure of the soil, increasing aeration andwater-holding capacity, and acts as a habitatfor other soil organisms. SOM also powersthe cycling, retention and release of variousnutrients essential to productivity.The Experimental SetupOldfield was determined to quantify theeffect that SOM, fertilization, and irrigationhave on crop productivity, both usedseparately and in tandem. She designed anexperiment with four target levels of SOM(1%, 2.5%, 5.5%, 8.5%) crossed with twodifferent fertilization treatments (noneversus 100 kg N/ha as urea) and furthercrossed with two irrigation treatments(optimum versus half of optimum). Toverify reliability of results, each treatmentwas replicated 10 times—for a grand total of160 experimental pots.A dilution approach of organic-rich Ahorizon soil (obtained from the Yale Farm inNew Haven, Connecticut) was used to createthese varying SOM levels. By mixing the soilwith an external mineral component (sandand clay) in different ratios, Oldfield was ableto create a wide gradient of organic matterconcentrations without having to artificiallymanipulate SOM (which can lead to otherexperimental issues).This greenhouse experiment wasconducted from May to July, and automaticventilation ensured that the pots ofspring wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.), theexperimental crop, never exceeded a dailytemperature of 30 degrees Celsius. A dripirrigation system was calibrated to emit 0.25gallons to each pot per hour, though this waslater modified to create different treatmentsfor various pots. “Optimum irrigation” wasdetermined to be around 127.2 mL of watereach day and “suboptimum irrigation” was63.6 mL. At the end of the growing period,all plants were cut at soil level at the sametime, dried at 65 degrees Celsius and thenweighed in aboveground biomass. Soils werethen passed through a sieve and measuredin terms of SOM content, water-retainingcapacity, pH, microbial biomass, and rates ofnet mineralization and nitrification.16 Yale Scientific Magazine September 2020 www.yalescientific.org

EcologyFOCUSResultsTo analyze the effect of SOM on growth,the researchers used a statistical methodcalled regression to quantify the impact ofeach measured variable on plant growth. Theregression models showed that abovegroundplant growth increased as SOM levelsincreased until a threshold concentrationof around five percent, after which wheatbiomass began to decline. For soils withoptimum irrigation, this decline startedoccurring at around six percent SOM.Across all SOM concentrations, thebiggest difference in aboveground biomasswas observed between the two experimentalextremes: the pots with optimum fertilizerand irrigation versus the pots with nofertilizer and half irrigation. However, thisdifference was largest at the lowest onepercent SOM concentration (pots withoptimum treatment produced 3.45 timesmore aboveground biomass) and became lessdramatic when SOM levels were at or greaterthan give percent (optimum pots produced1.6 times more biomass). This supports thehypothesis that SOM contribution can, insome cases, compensate for plants that arenot receiving any supplemental input andsubstitute in for mineral N fertilizer. But thisraises more questions of cost and reward—will productivity of mineral fertilized soilsalways outpace that of soils sustained byorganic matter alone? And what aboutthe reverse hypothesis: can added mineralnitrogen fertilizer easily compensate forlower SOM levels?NitrificationThough SOM levels did not seem toexhibit a strong correlative relationshipwith net rates of nitrification, they did havean impact on net rates of N mineralization,the process by which organic nitrogen isconverted to plant accessible inorganicforms. As SOM levels increased, rates ofN mineralization increased. This effectwas greater in fertilized soils comparedto unfertilized soils. However, after SOMconcentrations passed a specific threshold(around seven percent), pots with optimumtreatment began experiencing decreases innet rates of nitrification: the plants had lessnitrogen accessible to them at eight percentSOM as opposed to five percent SOM.Oldfield hypothesizes that this eventualdecrease in nitrification rate may be relatedwww.yalescientific.orgto increased microbial biomass that iscorrelated with higher SOM concentrations.These microbes themselves need to drawupon specific nutrients in the soil, includingnitrogen, phosphorous and sulfur, whichmay lead to a competitive environmentfor nutrients and oxygen in the soil. Insuch an environment, less resourcesare available for plant use, which couldexplain why productivity began to declineinstead of leveling off at the highest SOMconcentrations. “However, it’s very hardto get a holistic picture of the forms ofnitrogen. A follow up study would be almostthe exact same experimental setup, justwith different levels of nitrogen fertilizer,”Oldfield said. This would help determine ifthese nutritional elements become limitingat high levels of SOM.Final ConclusionsReturning to the original question,can soil organic matter substitute foragricultural inputs such as insufficientfertilization and irrigation? These results,obtained by the systematic variation ofvariables, demonstrate an optimisticanswer: building up SOM levels in soil willhave beneficial impacts on productivity.Though it may not be a perfect replacementfor N fertilizer, SOM can still help cut backon costly fertilizer inputs without riskinga lowered yield. “We know through otherresearch that’s being done right now thatagricultural soils tend to have very loworganic matter concentrations as a result oftillage and other conventional practices...You rarely see farm soil that is nine percentorganic matter,” said Oldfield when askedwhether the SOM threshold of five percentwould pose a problem.Some scientists and agriculturistscontinue to argue that though productivitymay increase with higher SOMconcentrations, these benefits will neveroutpace or outweigh those brought aboutby additional mineral fertilizer. However,this perspective fails to take into accountthe cost and availability of fertilizer. “Thereare potential outcomes that don’t directlytranslate to yield but are enhancementsin other environmental outcomes that wedo care about. This could be mitigatingagricultural runoff to improve waterquality, improving biological activity ofmicrobial communities, and enhancingcarbon sequestration,” Oldfield said.What’s next?Given that many groups such as theUSDA and policy makers rely on thegeneral notion that “more is better” whenit pertains to SOM levels in soil, Oldfieldis determined to continue delving into thenuances and intricacies of organic matterin soil. She briefly explains how increasingorganic matter could pose drawbacks:increased SOM concentrations are relatedto increases in nitrous oxide emissions, avery potent greenhouse gas. “I’m interestedin linking [this research] to other outcomesbesides yield,” she says. Her ultimateresearch goal is to run this experiment ona much larger scale and get the “full farmlook,” so she can not only measure cropgrowth, but also bigger profitability issuessuch as balancing yield against costs andobserving ecosystem outcomes. ■ART BY ANASTHASIA SHILOVCINDY KUANGCINDY KUANG is a first-year prospective Neuroscience major in Timothy Dwight College. Inaddition to writing for YSM, she also participates in Danceworks and the Chinese AmericanStudents Association.for threshold effects of soil organic matter on crop growth. Ecological Applications Soil Use andManagementof temperate regions: a review. Soil & Tillage ResearchSeptember 2020 Yale Scientific Magazine 17

FOCUS

Ecology

THE ROLE OF

IN PLANT

How does soil organic matter help crop growth?

BY CINDY KUANG

Death, SOM, and Soil

Death often stays in the soil. Over time,

organisms and residues in varying

states of decomposition form a vital

component of the soil: soil organic matter

(SOM). SOM has always been thought of as

an indicator of soil fertility, contributing to

healthier soil and better crop growth. Thus,

building SOM, or raising its levels through the

addition of compost or manure, is assumed to

be a cost-effective way of reducing reliance

on external inputs such as fertilization and

irrigation. But how well are the effects of

SOM actually understood? In various studies,

higher SOM has been shown to correlate with

both higher and lower productivity, so until

now, the effects of added SOM on soil fertility

are inconsistent and unclear.

The question is further complicated by

the possibility that this causative pathway is

bidirectional: Does SOM lead to increased

crop productivity, or do increased plant

inputs lead to higher SOM levels? In order

to figure out this relationship between SOM,

agricultural inputs, and productivity, we

need to be able to isolate and investigate

SOM’s effect on plant growth. Emily Oldfield,

a postdoctoral fellow at the Yale School of

Forestry and Environmental Studies, works

in the Bradford lab to study SOM’s effects. “A

lot of the policies that are being put forth by

organizations like the USDA, the Food and

Agriculture organization rest on the premise

of the more organic matter, the better, but

there’s really no hard quantification of how

much more and how much better,” Oldfield

said. “The goal of my research was to try to

put some numbers behind it.” She described

this greenhouse study as an effort to use

a controlled environment to establish a

causative pathway between SOM and crop

productivity.

What is soil?

Soil itself is a complex mixture of elements,

consisting of around forty-five percent

minerals, (including sand, silt, clay) and fifty

percent air and water. In particular, plants

require nitrogen more than any other nutrient,

but they can only take up mineral forms of it,

including nitrate and ammonia, which only

make up two percent of the nitrogen in soil.

The other ninety-eight percent of nitrogen is

organic and inaccessible to plants, meaning

many farmers rely on mineral N-fertilizer to

facilitate crop growth.

The remaining five percent of soil

composition is soil organic matter—anything

that was once living. Though SOM is a very

small percentage by volume, its influence is

disproportionately large. SOM dictates the

structure of the soil, increasing aeration and

water-holding capacity, and acts as a habitat

for other soil organisms. SOM also powers

the cycling, retention and release of various

nutrients essential to productivity.

The Experimental Setup

Oldfield was determined to quantify the

effect that SOM, fertilization, and irrigation

have on crop productivity, both used

separately and in tandem. She designed an

experiment with four target levels of SOM

(1%, 2.5%, 5.5%, 8.5%) crossed with two

different fertilization treatments (none

versus 100 kg N/ha as urea) and further

crossed with two irrigation treatments

(optimum versus half of optimum). To

verify reliability of results, each treatment

was replicated 10 times—for a grand total of

160 experimental pots.

A dilution approach of organic-rich A

horizon soil (obtained from the Yale Farm in

New Haven, Connecticut) was used to create

these varying SOM levels. By mixing the soil

with an external mineral component (sand

and clay) in different ratios, Oldfield was able

to create a wide gradient of organic matter

concentrations without having to artificially

manipulate SOM (which can lead to other

experimental issues).

This greenhouse experiment was

conducted from May to July, and automatic

ventilation ensured that the pots of

spring wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.), the

experimental crop, never exceeded a daily

temperature of 30 degrees Celsius. A drip

irrigation system was calibrated to emit 0.25

gallons to each pot per hour, though this was

later modified to create different treatments

for various pots. “Optimum irrigation” was

determined to be around 127.2 mL of water

each day and “suboptimum irrigation” was

63.6 mL. At the end of the growing period,

all plants were cut at soil level at the same

time, dried at 65 degrees Celsius and then

weighed in aboveground biomass. Soils were

then passed through a sieve and measured

in terms of SOM content, water-retaining

capacity, pH, microbial biomass, and rates of

net mineralization and nitrification.

16 Yale Scientific Magazine September 2020 www.yalescientific.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!