Taifas Literary Magazine no. 3, September, 2020

More documents

Recommendations

Info

44Taifas Literary Magazine no. 3, 2020, September33Am obosit să fiu aici, înconjurată de oamenicare nu înţeleg. Şi oare ceva mai tare decâtindiferenţa lor? Aş prefera să trăiesc certândumăzi de zi cu cineva care încearcă să mă facăsă pricep ce greşesc decât să stau alături decineva care nici măcar nu s-ar strădui îmivorbească.– Voi obosi oare fiind mereu înconjurat deoameni care nu înţeleg? Sau care auindiferenţă pentru tot ce nu e al lor? O dispută,chiar ceartă, cu cineva care mă ia totuşi înseamă e preferabilă unei alăturări de alăturări,fie şi virtuale, de cineva care nu s-ar strădui sămivorbească, să-mi transmită un ceva, acolo...34– Atungi când vomatinge ce ne dorim cuardoare nu vom fimulţumiţi. În fiecaredin noi e un MeşterManole şi... da, câte oAnă a lui...– Având luminaprivirilor, le trimtemsau le primim, dar nu sunteam oare orbi?35– Cum ai putea simţi bucuria regăsirii celuidrag dacă nu l-ai fi pierdut înainte? Cum te-aiputea bucura de persoana iubită dacă nu ţi-arfi lipsit măcar o clipă înainte?– Se spune că toate trec cu timpul, şi nuneapărat pentru că timpul estompeazăamintirile, ci pentru că trecerea lui aduceoameni şi experienţe noi. Iubirea însă, cândexistă, aprinsă, nu se stinge, nu seînceţoşează... Iubirea se înscăunează pe tronulTimpului.Milka MinkovaМилка МинковаМОЛКОТ ВО ДУША СОКРИЕНМолчам, и тој молк во душа е сокриен,со таговни зборови покриенИде некое време на невремепа тие зборови како залак,ги голташ,и срце да ти толчатостануваат да се премолчатДушата ќе тажи,мрмори.Молчи, душо моја,не пуштај гласќе помине ова невремеќе дојде време на спас.Молкот, молк не ќе бидезбор а прошка ќе се барабрат сестра да си видеод душа збор ќе се слушне,брат, сестра ќе си гушне.сама себе ќе се лажида не повреди братасисо болка ќе се блажиСолзи ќе се леаттаговните зборовисеатмолкот не ќе збориа срце тивко ќеISSN 2458-0198 - ISSN-L 2458-0198TAIFAS LITERARY MAGAZINE
45Taifas Literary Magazine no. 3, 2020, SeptemberNicolae Vasileyear I, no. 3, 2020, SeptemberThe systemismFrom the Peripatetic School to Globalization(1) Dialogues, otherwise than Plato’sPrologueThe dialogue, as a philosophical method,attributed to Plato (427 BC-347 BC), consistsin his discussions, or those of othercontemporary philosophers,with their magister Socrates (c.470 BC 399 BC), but it is basedon what Aristotle (384 BC-322BC), the successor of both ofthem, would later call andtheorize as being binary logic.The way of reaching the truththrough dialogue also has aname, maieutics, in a sense, theopposite of dialectics, whichdesignates the path towardsthe truth throughcontradictions, which has itsroots in the same age, and hasbeen developed later, in themodern age, by the German philosopherG.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831).The primordial forms of studied binarieswere good and evil. The ways and means thatlead to good have been called virtues, whilethose that lead to evil, vices.An axiom that has decisively influenced theSocratic criminal law theory, partially valideven in our days, tells that any mentallyhealthy person acts in the direction of good;the fact that there is plenty of evil on Earth,arises from the variousness of good and evildefinitions. Here is a first problem arisingfrom the binary logic: defining the oppositeentities.Socrates was very concerned withpoliticians' education. He deemed that the goalof the political class should be to grant thepeople’s happiness, and that this could only beachieved by politicians educated in the issuesof philosophy, by finding and promoting boththe virtues and the virtuous people. When thepoliticians did not evolve in the right direction,the people had to be educated to protest inorder to change them for the better, and that’show the first democracy in history emerged.As a matter of course, politicians did notlike the idea of raising the masses’ awareness,which would hamper their activities, and, as aresult, they arrested Socrates,accusing him of instigating thepopulation to disobedience.Thus occurred what has beenremembered as the trial ofSocrates, which for the firsttime in history has promptedthe difference between justiceand legality. Following thistrial, he was sentenced todeath. Socrates, as a greatcontributor to building up thefirst democracy recorded bythe history, regarded legality asof upmost importance for thestability of the society, but hewas fully convinced that in his case a greatinjustice was done. Being faced with the choicebetween the instability of the society bydeviation from legality, and the preservationof his firm conviction, at the cost of his life, thegreatest philosopher of his time chose thesecond variant.Thus, we see the fully persuaded crowdoriented towards the search for the good. It isonly in this race after the good,unintentionally, some people have impairedthe way for the good of others, committingalso misdoings, people who have turned toGod, for their forgiveness, a situation in whichthe Church took full advantage.ISSN 2458-0198 – ISSN-L 2458-0198
Page 1 and 2: 2 authors ... p. 2editorial ... p.
Page 3 and 4: 3Taifas Literary Magazine no. 3, 20
Page 43: 43Taifas Literary Magazine no. 3, 2

Taifas Literary Magazine no. 3, September, 2020

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?