22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P09 MONITORING OF SENSORIALLy ACTIVE<br />

SuLPhuR SubSTANCES IN MALT AND bEER<br />

REnATA MIKULíKOVá, SYLVIE BěLáKOVá,<br />

ZDEněK SVOBODA and SIMOnA MACUCHOVá<br />

Research Institute of Brewing and Malting, Plc., Malting<br />

Institute Brno, Mostecká 7, 614 00 Brno,<br />

mikulikova@brno.beerresearch.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

Recently, a great deal of research effort has been devoted<br />

to sensorially active substances affecting beer quality. Quality<br />

of brewing materials, unhopped wort and hopped wort<br />

production technology, fermentation technology, beer maturation<br />

and beer ageing contribute significantly to analytical<br />

and sensorial beer characteristics.<br />

Heterocyclic and sulphur compounds, some of them with<br />

high sensorial activity even in extremely low concentrations,<br />

belong to sensorially active substances affecting beer quality<br />

principally 1 . Trace amounts of these compounds commonly<br />

detectable in food contribute to their flavor, therefore this effect<br />

can be generally assessed as favourable. In malt and beer,<br />

however, it is true to a limited extend only and the presence<br />

of heterocyclic and sulphur substances is evaluated rather<br />

negatively 2 . Sulphur compounds get into beer either with initial<br />

materials (malt, hop) or they are formed in the course<br />

of chemical or enzymatical reaction during the respective<br />

production phases (mashing, brewing, fermentation, ageing).<br />

Content of sulphur compounds in barley and hop depends not<br />

only on a variety but on a growing locality, course of weather<br />

and growing technology employed as well. In malt, content<br />

of sulphur substances depends first of all on malting technology<br />

and possible contamination with undesirable microorganisms<br />

3 . Most of the sulphur compounds present in barley,<br />

malt and beer are non-volatile substances (amino acids, proteins,<br />

inorganic sulphates). These substances do not directly<br />

account for unfavourable beer flavours and odours but under<br />

certain conditions they may be important precursors of sensorially<br />

active substances. These substances are, in majority of<br />

cases, volatile and their amount is usually less than 1 % of the<br />

total amount of the sulphur containing substances in beer, i.e.<br />

actual amounts of substances responsible for sulphur odours<br />

are extremely low 4 .<br />

Experimental<br />

S e n s o r i c a l l y A c t i v e S u l p h u r<br />

S u b s t a n c e<br />

Following volatile sulphur substances were monitored:<br />

dimethylsulphide [75-18-3], dimethyl disulphide [624-92-0],<br />

dimethyltrisulphide [3658-80-8], carbondisulphide [75-15-0],<br />

ethylsulphide [75-08-1], diethyldisulphide [111-81-6], methionol<br />

[505-10-2], 3-methylthiophen [616-44-4], ethylthioacetate<br />

[625-60-5], 2-methyl-1-buthanthiol [1878-18-8].<br />

s592<br />

S e l e c t i o n o f t h e A n a l y z e d S a m p l e s<br />

Sensorially active sulphur substances were determined<br />

in beers bought in retail stores. Six pale dispensed beers, 4<br />

dark, 6 lager and 3 non alcoholic beers were selected for the<br />

analyses.<br />

The analyzed malt samples were produced from different<br />

barley varieties (Bojos, Jersay, Malz, Prestige, Tolar,<br />

Xanadu), from 3 growing stations (Branišovice, Věrovany,<br />

Vysoká).<br />

D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f V o l a t i l e S u l p h u r<br />

S u b s t a n c e s<br />

Direct analysis of sulphur sensorially active substances<br />

is not easily applicable regarding their very low concentrations<br />

(µg kg –1 ,dm –3 – ng kg –1 ,dm –3 ) in the analyzed matrixes<br />

(malt, beer) 5,6 . Prior to the analysis, the analytes must be<br />

extracted from the matrix and concentrated. The HS-SPME<br />

method was used for extraction and concentration 7,8 . The<br />

CAR/PDMS fibre was chosen as the optimum fibre for this<br />

technique. The gas chromatographic analysis with flame photometric<br />

detection was employed to determinate sensorially<br />

active sulphur substances.<br />

HS-SPME/ GC/ FPD conditions:<br />

Sample: 2 ml of beer (vial 4 ml)<br />

6 ml of malt extract (vial 50 ml)<br />

Sample temperature: 45 °C, 10 min<br />

SPME fiber: 85 μm CAR/PDMS<br />

Extraction: HS-SPME, 30 min, 45 °C<br />

Desorption: 3 min, 250 °C<br />

Chromatographic conditions:<br />

Capillary column: GS-Gaspro (30 m × 0.32 mm)<br />

Thermal program: from 40 °C to 235 °C<br />

Flow of carrying gas He: 1.5 ml min –1<br />

PTV injector: 250 °C, splitless (3 min)<br />

FPD detector: T detector – 150 °C,<br />

T base – 250 °C<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Two types of fibres (PEG, CAR/PDMS) were tested for<br />

the HS-SPME analysis. Fig. 1 shows higher affinity to the<br />

CAR/PDMS fiber for the analytes studied. This fibre was chosen<br />

for the analysis of sulphur substances, sorption time was<br />

optimized at 45 °C. Optimum sorption time was 30 minutes.<br />

Validation parameters for the relevant analytes are given<br />

in Table I.<br />

Carbon disulphide, methionol, dimethylsulphide,<br />

3-methylthiophen and diethyldisulphide were detected in<br />

beers. Table II shows results of beer sample analyses.<br />

In malt samples only dimethylsulphide was determined.<br />

Results of malt analyses are given in Fig. 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!