22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

S a m p l e P r e p a r a t i o n<br />

5 ml of water were extracted with hexane four times.<br />

Hexane layers were combined, dried with anhydrous na 2 SO 4<br />

and evaporated until nearly dry. Remaining solvent was evaporated<br />

at room temperature just before analysis. The residuum<br />

was dissolved in a known volume of standard solution<br />

of PCB-103 and analysed by GC.<br />

G C A n a l y s i s<br />

Analysis were performed on gas chromatograph Agilent<br />

Technologies 6890n equipped with electron capture detector<br />

using capillary GC column DB-5, 60 m × 0.25 mm (i.d.),<br />

0.25 µm film thickness (purchased from J&W Scientific, Folsom,<br />

California, USA) using splitless technique with temperature<br />

program as follows: isothermal at 110 °C for 1.5 min.,<br />

then temperature elevation to 200 °C at 30 °C min –1 , hold for<br />

0.2 min, then temperature elevation to 300 °C at 2.5 °C min –1 .<br />

Helium was used as carrier gas with a constant flow rate of<br />

0.8 ml min –1 .<br />

Fig. 1. Changes in PCb concentration in water stored in PET<br />

receptacles (experimentally obtained data compared with data<br />

calculated using the kinetic equation of adsorption 1 )<br />

(♦) – PCB 28 c exp , (░) – PCB 28 c cald , (▲) – PCB 52 c exp , (▒) PCB<br />

52 c cald , (○) –PCB 101 c exp , (— – –) – PCb 101 c cald , (∆) – PCB 138<br />

c exp , (- ) – PCb 138 c cald , (□) – PCB 153 c exp , (─ ─) – PCB 153 c cald ,<br />

(■) – PCB 180 c exp , (──) – PCB 180 c cald<br />

Results<br />

At experiments the concentration of PCBs started to<br />

decrease immediately after filling the receptacles in both systems<br />

studied as seen from Figs. 1 and 2.<br />

The observed dependences of PCBs concentration vs.<br />

time were modelled using the kinetic equation (1), which has<br />

been derived for the diffusion of PAHs in non-stirred liquids<br />

placed into cylindrically shaped receptacles 9 :<br />

, (1)<br />

where c 0 is the initial concentration of PCBs in water, c t is<br />

the concentration of PCBs in the medium at time t, and c ∞<br />

is the concentration of PCBs corresponding to infinite time<br />

(equilibrium), a is the radius of the cylinder, α n are the roots<br />

s569<br />

Fig. 2. Changes in PCb concentration in water stored in PS<br />

receptacles (experimentally obtained data compared with data<br />

calculated using the kinetic equation of adsorption 1 ).<br />

(♦) – PCB 28 c exp , (░) – PCB 28 c cald , (▲) – PCB 52 c exp , (▒) PCB<br />

52 c cald , (○) –PCB 101 c exp , (— – –) – PCb 101 c cald , (∆) – PCB 138<br />

c exp , (-) – PCb 138 c cald , (□) – PCB 153 c exp , (─ ─) – PCB 153 c cald ,<br />

(■) – PCB 180 c exp , (──) – PCB 180 c cald<br />

of the zero-order first-kind Bessel function and D is the diffusion<br />

coefficient of PCB in water. The parameters c ∞ , c 0 – c ∞<br />

and D were identified by the non-linear least squares method<br />

by minimizing the sum of squares of differences between<br />

the PCB concentrations measured experimentally and those<br />

calculated by equation (1). The values of identified parameters<br />

are listed in Skláršová et al. 17 .<br />

The extent of PCBs removal can be characterized by the<br />

distribution coefficient expressed by the formula:<br />

The higher is the value of β, the greater part of PCBs<br />

is removed from water after reaching the equilibrium. The<br />

values of β are listed in Skláršová et al. 17 . The values of β for<br />

PS are much higher than the corresponding values for PET.<br />

This implies a much higher affinity of PCBs to PS in comparison<br />

with PET.<br />

For understanding the sorption process, it is useful to<br />

quantify the ratio of the“total PCBs area” to the contact area<br />

of the plastic receptacles. The surface areas S of the molecules<br />

of the congeners were calculated using the Savol program<br />

(Tripos, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and are summarised in<br />

Skláršová et al. 17 . The number of PCB molecules adsorbed<br />

on the polymer surfaces was calculated from the differences<br />

between the initial and the equilibrium concentrations of<br />

PCBs in water. The following formula gives C, the coverage<br />

of the plastic surface by the PCB monolayer:<br />

C<br />

. (2)<br />

( − )<br />

N a c c S<br />

A 0 ∞<br />

= , (3)<br />

2M<br />

where M is the molar mass of the PCB, N A is the Avogadro<br />

number. The results showed that the total area composed<br />

from partial PCB areas adsorbed onto PET is equal to 30.2 %

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!