22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

When analysing a samples containing arsenobetaine<br />

(AsB) it is necessary to analyse the sample twice, once with<br />

the UV lamp switched off and once with it switched on. This<br />

is due to the fact that AsB coelutes with arsenite. If the UV<br />

lamp is off AsB don’t react with naBH 4 and don’t give a<br />

signal.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

T o t a l A r s e n i c C o n c e n t r a t i o n s<br />

The total arsenic concentrations in fish muscle are summarized<br />

in Table I. These results are lower than limits given<br />

by legislative of Czech Republic. All samples were also measured<br />

by atomic absorption spectrometry with hydride generation<br />

to ensure quality results. Results obtained by HG-AAS<br />

were comparable to HG-AFS results.<br />

Table I<br />

Total arsenic concentrations in the investigated samples<br />

determined by AFS<br />

Sample Total arsenic [μg kg –1 ] RSD [%]<br />

Salmon 1 186 2<br />

Salmon 2 741 4<br />

Trout 1 968 0<br />

Trout 2 966 1<br />

Trout 3 618 4<br />

Tunny 2059 1<br />

S p e c i a t i o n A n a l y s i s o f A r s e n i c<br />

The influence of pH of mobile phase on the separation<br />

efficiency has been investigated. The pH values were<br />

in the range of pH 4–8. The best results were obtained with<br />

pH 6.1. Separation of the five arsenic standards is shown in<br />

the Fig. 1.<br />

Typical chromatogram of fish extract (Thunnus atlanticus)<br />

is presented in Fig. 2. All analysed samples of fish contained<br />

only non-toxic arsenobetaine.<br />

The results of the speciation analysis are shown in the<br />

Table II. Comparision with total arsenic content reveals that<br />

extraction efficiencies ranged from 66 to 106 %.<br />

Fig. 1. Standard chromatogram of five arsenic species<br />

s816<br />

Fig. 2. Peak of arsenobetain in the chromatogram of tunny<br />

Table III<br />

Arsenobetaine concentrations in the investigated samples<br />

determined by HPLC-UV-HG-AFS<br />

Sample Extractable arsenic [μg kg–1 ] RSD [%]<br />

Salmon 1 170 9<br />

Salmon 2 783 4<br />

Trout 1 714 0<br />

Trout 2 644 1<br />

Trout 3 407 4<br />

Tunny 1760 2<br />

Conclusions<br />

Amount of total arsenic in the samples was lower than<br />

limits for arsenic given by legislative of Czech Republic.<br />

Arsenic was present in the form of nontoxic arsenobetaine in<br />

all analysed samples of fish.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Schaeffer R., Francesconi K. A., Kienzl n., Soeroes C.,<br />

Fodor P., Varadi L., Raml R., Goessler W., Kuehnelt D.:<br />

Talanta 69, 856 (2006).<br />

2. Mandal K. B., Suzuki K. T.: Talanta 58, 201 (2002).<br />

<strong>3.</strong> McSheehy S., Szpunar J., Morabito R., Quevauviller P.:<br />

Trends Anal. Chem. 22, 191 (2003).<br />

4. Slejkovec Z., Bajc Z., Doganoc D. Z.: Talanta 62, 931<br />

(2004).<br />

5. Schaeffer R., Soeroes C., Ipolyi I., Fodor P., Thomaidis<br />

n. S.: Anal. Chim. Acta 547, 109 (2005).<br />

6. Gomez-Ariza J. L., Sanches-Rodas D., Giraldez I.,<br />

Morales E.: Talanta 51, 257 (2000).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!