22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P103 RELATIONShIP bETwEEN xANThOhuMOL,<br />

POLyPhENOLS, AND FLAVONOIDS CONTENT<br />

IN hOP LEAVES AND CONES wITh REGARD<br />

TO CuLTIVAR AND VEGETATION PERIOD<br />

eVA üRGEOVá, PETER KULACS, MáRIA VAŠKOVá<br />

and ľUDOVíT POLíVKA<br />

Department of Biotechnologies, Faculty of Natural Sciences,<br />

University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Nám. J.<br />

Herdu 2, 917 01 Trnava, Slovakia,<br />

eva.urgeova@ucm.sk<br />

Introduction<br />

Some secondary metabolites are present in plant cells<br />

in the form of precursors and are activated after pathogen attack<br />

1 . Secondary metabolites having biocide effect include<br />

isoprenoids, phenol substances, organic sulphur compounds,<br />

saponins, alkaloids, proteins, and peptides 2 .<br />

In this perspective, increasing attention is being paid to<br />

the plant called common hop (Humulus lupulus L.). The plant<br />

is diecious. Wild-growing hop grows on wet soils, mainly in<br />

riparian zones, in shrubberies, on the edges of canals and in<br />

similar places 3,4 . All the main components are contained in<br />

lupuline glands 3,5 , although some components, e.g. essential<br />

oils, were also identified in the leaves of the plant 6 . Concerning<br />

the chemical composition, hop resins are prenylated derivates<br />

of floroglucinol, comprising alpha-bitter acids and beta-bitter<br />

acids 5 . In recent years, antibiotic 7 , antifungal 8 , and antioxidant<br />

activities of humulone 9 have been identified. One of the<br />

big groups of substances contained in the hop plant is the<br />

group of polyphenol compounds 10 , phenol acids, chalkones,<br />

flavanols, flavonols, antocyanides, catechines and proantocyanides.<br />

Flavonoids as a group of organic compounds display<br />

a wide range of biological and pharmacological properties 11 ,<br />

including antiviral, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer<br />

properties 12,13 . Stevens 14 identified three main groups of<br />

flavonoids in the hop plant including prenylflavonoids. The<br />

content of prenylated flavonoids in the hop plant fluctuates<br />

between 0.2–0.6 % 15 . The chemical composition of hop is not<br />

constant; it changes with time and depends on the conditions<br />

of post-harvest storage 4,15 . Regarding the chemical composition,<br />

an important role was played by such factors as the plant<br />

development stage, location, growing practices, weather, and<br />

pressure of pathogens. Langezaal 6 reports that in hop leaves<br />

there are essential oils in much lower concentrations than<br />

in cones. To our knowledge, the content of low-molecular<br />

polyphenyls in hop leaves has not been studied yet.<br />

Experimental<br />

M a t e r i a l s a n d M e t h o d s<br />

We tested the samples of hop, cones and leaves taken<br />

from the Gene Bank of the Slovak Republic in the Institute<br />

of Plant Production, Piešťany (SCPV–VÚRV). The samples<br />

of different cultivars of hop were dried and homogenized.<br />

We used the following cultivars of hop: Osvald’s clones 31,<br />

(K-31), and 72 (K-72), Bor, Sládek, Aromat, Zlatan, and Pre-<br />

s810<br />

miant. We collected the samples before flowering and at the<br />

end of vegetal period.<br />

The content of phenol substances was determined by<br />

Singelton’s method 16 . The amount of 0.2 ml of methanol<br />

extract was mixed with l ml of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent<br />

and 0.8 ml of 7.5 % (w/v) na 2 CO 3 . Absorbance was measured<br />

at 750 nm wave-length after 30 minutes of incubation<br />

in dark. The content of polyphenols was compared with the<br />

absorbance of galic acid.<br />

Flavonoids were determined by Rakotoarison’s<br />

method 17 . 1 ml of methanol extract was added to 1 ml of methanol<br />

solution of AlCl 3 . 6H2 O, 2% (w/v), and absorbance was<br />

measured after 10 minutes at 394 nm. Quercetin was taken as<br />

the standard.<br />

Xanthohumol was determined by HPLC. Dry material<br />

was homogenized with methanol in a sonificator (Bandelin<br />

Electronic, Germany) for about 10 minutes, and then purified<br />

by centrifugation and filtration on a column (Waters, USA).<br />

Eluate (5 µl) was injected into the HPLC instrument and detected<br />

at 370 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 900 ml of<br />

methanol with 100 ml of water. The analytical column was<br />

nucleodur Sphinx RP EC 150/4.6 (5 µm). Xanthohumol was<br />

purchased form Sigma, Germany.<br />

Results<br />

The concentration ranges of phenol substances, flavonoids<br />

and xanthohumol in hop cultivated in the Slovak Republic<br />

are summarized. The content of polyphenols and flavonoids<br />

was monitored during the vegetal period of plant growth. All<br />

cultivars showed different contents of secondary metabolites<br />

during the vegetal period, their content in leaves decreased<br />

from the end of June to September (Table I).<br />

Table I<br />

Polyphenols content in hop leaves during the vegetal period<br />

Cultivar Polyphenols [mg g –1 DM]<br />

06/07 * 09/07 *<br />

K-31 8.83 1.22<br />

Bor 5.00 2.25<br />

Sládek 5.76 2.04<br />

K-72 7.46 0.99<br />

Aromat 6.56 0.98<br />

Premiant 5.52 0.90<br />

Zlatan 6.23 1.82<br />

* 06/07 and 09/07 – date of sampling<br />

Phenol substances were in the interval between<br />

0.90–2.25 mg g –1 of dry matter in leaves, and from 4.0 to<br />

21.1 mg g –1 of dry matter in cones (Table II) at the end of the<br />

vegetal period.<br />

The content of polyphenols was dependent on the type<br />

of cultivar and on climatic conditions as well. Comparison<br />

of the contents of polyphenols in extracts from hop cones in<br />

2006 and 2007 is shown in Fig. 1. The content of phenol substances<br />

in leaves did not basically relate to the content of phe-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!