22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

Table II<br />

Schedule of the treatment against storage diseases<br />

Code<br />

Pesticide preparation [kg ha –1 ]<br />

Application date<br />

active ingredient – safety period<br />

S1 – –<br />

S2<br />

Delan 700 WG (0.7)<br />

dithianon – 21 days<br />

September 19, 2007<br />

S3<br />

Thiram Granuflo (<strong>3.</strong>0)<br />

thiram – 14 days<br />

September 26, 2007<br />

S4<br />

Zato 50 WG (0.15)<br />

trifloxystrobin – 14 days<br />

September 26, 2007<br />

A n a l y t i c a l M e t h o d s<br />

Most of pesticides were liquid chromatography (LC)<br />

amenable, so for isolation of 14 from 17 examined analytes<br />

the QuEChERS method 3 was applied. Crude extract (without<br />

cleanup step realized with primary-secondary amine (PSA))<br />

was examined by LC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry<br />

(MS/MS). Limits of quantitation (LOQ) for these<br />

pesticides were 0.002 mg kg –1 , only for dodine LOQ was<br />

0.005 mg kg –1 . Ethylenbisdithiocarbamates (EBDC), in this<br />

study represented by mancozeb, metiram and thiram, were<br />

determined as a sum by solid phase micro-extraction (SPME)<br />

of their degradation product (carbon disulfide), identification/<br />

quantitation was performed by gas chromatography coupled<br />

with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), LOQ was 0.001 mg kg –1 .<br />

s808<br />

Results<br />

At the time of harvest, residues of some pesticides (acetamiprid,<br />

cyprodinil, flufenoxuron, fluquinconazole, fenoxycarb,<br />

tetraconazole and thiacloprid) used for treatment<br />

(Table I) were not detected. Other pesticides exceeding the<br />

method LOQ could be grouped into three categories based<br />

on their concentration levels: (i) compounds with residues<br />

below 0.01 mg kg –1 at the time of harvest (i.e. difenoconazole,<br />

dithianon, methoxyfenozide, EBDC), (ii) compounds with<br />

residues exceeding the “baby food” limit at the harvest time,<br />

but declining below the limit at the end of the storage period<br />

(i.e. bitertanol, etofenprox) and (iii) compounds with residues<br />

not significantly declining and exceeding the 0.01 mg kg –1 all<br />

the time (i.e. dodine, pyrimethanil). no generalization on the<br />

relationship between residues dynamics and apple variety<br />

could be drawn. The highest amount of bitertanol residues<br />

occurred in variety Golden Delicious (Fig. 1. A) and etofenprox<br />

residues was the highest in variety Idared (Fig. 1. B) in<br />

all experiments. Worth to notice that the changes of pesticides<br />

classified as concentration category (iii) were not dependent<br />

on apple variety.<br />

Treatment for post-harvest disease protection was carried<br />

out before the harvest in compliance with required safety<br />

period. For this purpose three fungicide preparations with<br />

different active ingredients (dithianon, thiram and trifloxystrobin)<br />

were tested (Table II). Thiram, although applied only<br />

14 days before the harvest, did not exceed “baby food” limit,<br />

Fig. 1. The dynamics of selected pesticides during cold storage (1–3 ºC); A: bitertanol, B: etofenprox, C: trifloxystrobin,<br />

D: dithianon

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!