3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />
P102 DyNAMICS OF SELECTED PESTICIDES<br />
APPLIED TO APPLE PROTECTION DuRING<br />
PRE-hARVEST AND POST-hARVEST PERIOD<br />
JAnA URBAnOVá a , OnDřEJ LACInA a , JAKUB<br />
SCHůREK a , MIROSLAV LánSKý b and JAnA<br />
HAJŠLOVá a<br />
a Department of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Institute of<br />
Chemical Technology in Prague, Technicka 3, Prague 6,<br />
166 28, Czech Republic,<br />
b Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology, Holovousy,<br />
Czech Republic,<br />
jana.hajslova@vscht.cz<br />
Introduction<br />
Pesticides represent an important group of agrochemicals<br />
used for food crop protection. However, their residues<br />
can often be detected in treated crops at the harvest time.<br />
Because of the health hazard, this issue is of high concern,<br />
mainly when crops containing residues are intended for baby<br />
food production. Infants and young children are the most vulnerable<br />
group of human population; therefore, uniform maximum<br />
residue limit (MRL) 0.01 mg kg –1 has been established<br />
in EU for any pesticide residue occurring in processed baby<br />
food. Currently, most of producers require raw materials<br />
complying with this (low) residue limit, although it applies to<br />
processed product. Under real-life conditions, this may pose<br />
a problem, since many pesticide preparations even when used<br />
in accordance with Good Agriculture Practice (GAP) may<br />
leave residues exceeding the “baby food” MRL 1 .<br />
Table I<br />
Schedule of the pre-harvest treatment<br />
Application date<br />
Pesticide preparation/<br />
dosage [per hectare]<br />
s807<br />
Apples are the key raw material for production of fruitbased<br />
baby food. Unfortunately apples can be attacked by<br />
various disorders not only during pre-harvest period but also<br />
during storage. Sometimes incipient infection is too small to<br />
be seen prior to fruit storage but may develop under favourable<br />
conditions (high humidity) as a result of sporulation<br />
from older lesions. Particular treatment strategy should be<br />
applied to apples intended for storage because the decline of<br />
pesticide residues within a post-harvest time might be slower<br />
(depending on the storage conditions) than during the preharvest<br />
period when the drop is relatively rapid due to various<br />
environmental factors 2 .<br />
Experimental<br />
F i e l d E x p e r i m e n t s<br />
Four different apple varieties, Golden Delicious, Gloster,<br />
Idared and Melrose, were examined in this study. The<br />
same treatment schedule was applied to all studied varieties.<br />
The overview of pesticide preparations and some relevant<br />
characteristics of active ingredients are listed in Table I.<br />
In the first phase, the experimental apple trees obtained<br />
specific pesticide treatment from April to June, see Table I. In<br />
the second phase, the orchard was divided into four sections<br />
(S1–S4). In the S1 no pesticides were used, while in S2–S4,<br />
fungicides against storage pests were applied according to the<br />
scheme shown in Table II.<br />
The first set of samples was taken for analysis at the time<br />
of harvest (October 10, 2007) and the next two after three<br />
(January 8, 2008) and five (March 19, 2008) months of cold<br />
storage (1–3 ºC).<br />
Active ingredient Mode of action Safety period [days]<br />
April 12, 2007 Chorus 75 WG/0.2 kg cyprodinil fungicide 28<br />
Cascade 5 EC/1.5 kg flufenoxuron insecticide -<br />
April 19, 2007 Clarinet 20 SC/1.5 dm 3 fluquinconazole fungicide 28<br />
pyrimethanil fungicide<br />
April 26, 2007 Thiram Granulo/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg thiram fungicide 14<br />
May 3, 2007 Dithane neotec/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg mancozeb fungicide 21<br />
Calypso 480 SC/0.2 dm 3 thiacloprid insecticide 14<br />
May 11, 2007 Delan 700 WDG/0.6 dm 3 dithianon fungicide 21<br />
Score 250 EC/0.2 dm 3 difenoconazole fungicide 49<br />
May 18, 2007 Polyram WG/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg metiram fungicide 21<br />
Insegar 25 WP/0.3 kg fenoxycarb insecticide 60<br />
May 25, 2007 Integro/0.5 dm 3 methoxyfenozide insecticide 14<br />
June 1, 2007<br />
Baycor 25 WP/1.0 kg<br />
Score 250 EC/0.2 dm<br />
bitertanol fungicide 35<br />
3 difenoconatole fungicide 49<br />
June 7, 2007 Domark 10 EC/0.4 dm3 tetraconazole fungicide 14<br />
June 14, 2007 Syllit 400 SC/1.7 dm3 Trebon 10 EW/0.5 dm<br />
dodine fungicide 21<br />
3 etofenprox insecticide 28<br />
June 26, 2007 Mythos 30 SC/1.0 dm3 Mospilan 20 SP/0.25 kg<br />
pyrimethanil<br />
acetamiprid<br />
fungicide<br />
insecticide<br />
28<br />
28