22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P102 DyNAMICS OF SELECTED PESTICIDES<br />

APPLIED TO APPLE PROTECTION DuRING<br />

PRE-hARVEST AND POST-hARVEST PERIOD<br />

JAnA URBAnOVá a , OnDřEJ LACInA a , JAKUB<br />

SCHůREK a , MIROSLAV LánSKý b and JAnA<br />

HAJŠLOVá a<br />

a Department of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Institute of<br />

Chemical Technology in Prague, Technicka 3, Prague 6,<br />

166 28, Czech Republic,<br />

b Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology, Holovousy,<br />

Czech Republic,<br />

jana.hajslova@vscht.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

Pesticides represent an important group of agrochemicals<br />

used for food crop protection. However, their residues<br />

can often be detected in treated crops at the harvest time.<br />

Because of the health hazard, this issue is of high concern,<br />

mainly when crops containing residues are intended for baby<br />

food production. Infants and young children are the most vulnerable<br />

group of human population; therefore, uniform maximum<br />

residue limit (MRL) 0.01 mg kg –1 has been established<br />

in EU for any pesticide residue occurring in processed baby<br />

food. Currently, most of producers require raw materials<br />

complying with this (low) residue limit, although it applies to<br />

processed product. Under real-life conditions, this may pose<br />

a problem, since many pesticide preparations even when used<br />

in accordance with Good Agriculture Practice (GAP) may<br />

leave residues exceeding the “baby food” MRL 1 .<br />

Table I<br />

Schedule of the pre-harvest treatment<br />

Application date<br />

Pesticide preparation/<br />

dosage [per hectare]<br />

s807<br />

Apples are the key raw material for production of fruitbased<br />

baby food. Unfortunately apples can be attacked by<br />

various disorders not only during pre-harvest period but also<br />

during storage. Sometimes incipient infection is too small to<br />

be seen prior to fruit storage but may develop under favourable<br />

conditions (high humidity) as a result of sporulation<br />

from older lesions. Particular treatment strategy should be<br />

applied to apples intended for storage because the decline of<br />

pesticide residues within a post-harvest time might be slower<br />

(depending on the storage conditions) than during the preharvest<br />

period when the drop is relatively rapid due to various<br />

environmental factors 2 .<br />

Experimental<br />

F i e l d E x p e r i m e n t s<br />

Four different apple varieties, Golden Delicious, Gloster,<br />

Idared and Melrose, were examined in this study. The<br />

same treatment schedule was applied to all studied varieties.<br />

The overview of pesticide preparations and some relevant<br />

characteristics of active ingredients are listed in Table I.<br />

In the first phase, the experimental apple trees obtained<br />

specific pesticide treatment from April to June, see Table I. In<br />

the second phase, the orchard was divided into four sections<br />

(S1–S4). In the S1 no pesticides were used, while in S2–S4,<br />

fungicides against storage pests were applied according to the<br />

scheme shown in Table II.<br />

The first set of samples was taken for analysis at the time<br />

of harvest (October 10, 2007) and the next two after three<br />

(January 8, 2008) and five (March 19, 2008) months of cold<br />

storage (1–3 ºC).<br />

Active ingredient Mode of action Safety period [days]<br />

April 12, 2007 Chorus 75 WG/0.2 kg cyprodinil fungicide 28<br />

Cascade 5 EC/1.5 kg flufenoxuron insecticide -<br />

April 19, 2007 Clarinet 20 SC/1.5 dm 3 fluquinconazole fungicide 28<br />

pyrimethanil fungicide<br />

April 26, 2007 Thiram Granulo/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg thiram fungicide 14<br />

May 3, 2007 Dithane neotec/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg mancozeb fungicide 21<br />

Calypso 480 SC/0.2 dm 3 thiacloprid insecticide 14<br />

May 11, 2007 Delan 700 WDG/0.6 dm 3 dithianon fungicide 21<br />

Score 250 EC/0.2 dm 3 difenoconazole fungicide 49<br />

May 18, 2007 Polyram WG/<strong>3.</strong>0 kg metiram fungicide 21<br />

Insegar 25 WP/0.3 kg fenoxycarb insecticide 60<br />

May 25, 2007 Integro/0.5 dm 3 methoxyfenozide insecticide 14<br />

June 1, 2007<br />

Baycor 25 WP/1.0 kg<br />

Score 250 EC/0.2 dm<br />

bitertanol fungicide 35<br />

3 difenoconatole fungicide 49<br />

June 7, 2007 Domark 10 EC/0.4 dm3 tetraconazole fungicide 14<br />

June 14, 2007 Syllit 400 SC/1.7 dm3 Trebon 10 EW/0.5 dm<br />

dodine fungicide 21<br />

3 etofenprox insecticide 28<br />

June 26, 2007 Mythos 30 SC/1.0 dm3 Mospilan 20 SP/0.25 kg<br />

pyrimethanil<br />

acetamiprid<br />

fungicide<br />

insecticide<br />

28<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!