22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

Table I<br />

The structures of the compounds studied<br />

Compound R 1 R 2<br />

1 nH 2 H<br />

2 nH 2 C 6 H 5 –CH 2<br />

3 nH 2 4–CH 3 –C 6 H 4 –CH 2<br />

4 nH 2 4–Cl–C 6 H 4 –CH 2<br />

5 nH 2 C 6 H 5 –CO<br />

6 nH 2 4–CH 3 –C 6 H 4 –CO<br />

7 nH 2 4–Cl–C 6 H 4 –CO<br />

8 CH 3 H<br />

9 CH 3 C 6 H 5 –CH 2<br />

10 CH 3 4–CH 3 –C 6 H 4 –CH 2<br />

11 CH 3 4–Cl–C 6 H 4 –CH 2<br />

12 CH 3 C 6 H 5 –CO<br />

13 CH 3 4–CH 3 –C 6 H 4 –CO<br />

14 CH 3 4–Cl–C 6 H 4 –CO<br />

nefelometer, was 1 × 10 7 CFU cm –3 . The 1 ml of this suspensions<br />

was homogenized with 9 ml of melted (45 °C) Sabouraud<br />

Dextrose Agar and poured into Petri dishes. On the surface of<br />

the agar the 6 mm diameter sterile paper discs (Hi Media,<br />

Mumbai, India) were put and impregnated with 10 –3 ml of<br />

samples. The plates were incubated for 24–47 hours at 25 °C,<br />

and the diameter of the resulting inhibition zone (including<br />

the disc) was measured (in mm). The evaluation of antifungal<br />

activities of samples was carried out in three repetitions.<br />

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined<br />

by the agar dilution method according to guidelines<br />

established by the nCCLS standard M7-A5 25 . The MIC of<br />

tested benzimidazoles is defined as the lowest concentration of<br />

the compound at which no growth of the strain is observed in<br />

time and under specified experimental conditions. Stock solutions<br />

of the compounds were prepared in dimethylformamide<br />

(DMF). Further dilutions were performed with distilled<br />

water. The inoculated plates were then incubated at 35 °C<br />

for 16–20 h. A control (using DMF without any test compound)<br />

was included for each organism. It was determined<br />

that the solvent had no activity against any of the test microorganisms.<br />

The negative logarithms of molar MICs (log1/c MIC )<br />

were determined and used for further calculations.<br />

M o l e c u l a r M o d e l i n g a n d l o g P<br />

C a l c u l a t i o n s<br />

Molecular modeling studies were performed by using<br />

CS Chem-Office Software version 7.0 (Cambridge software)<br />

running on a P-III processor 26 . All molecules were<br />

constructed by using Chem Draw Ultra 7.0 and saved as<br />

the template structure. For every compound, the template<br />

structure was suitably changed considering its structural<br />

s754<br />

features, copied to Chem 3D 7.0 to create a 3-D model and,<br />

finally, the model was clened up and subjected to energy<br />

minimization using molecular mechanics (MM2). The minimization<br />

was executed until the root mean square (RMS)<br />

gradient value reached a value smaller than 0.1 kcal mol –1 ⋅A.<br />

The Austin Model-1 (AM-1) method was used for re-optimization<br />

until the RMS gradient attained a value smaller<br />

than 0.0001 kcal mol –1 ⋅A using MOPAC. The lowest energy<br />

structure was used for each molecule to calculate lipophilicity<br />

parameters (Table II).<br />

S t a t i s t i c a l M e t h o d s<br />

The complete regression analysis was carried out by<br />

PASS 2005, GESS 2006, nCSS Statistical Softwares 27 .<br />

Table II<br />

Data of the lipophilicity parameters<br />

Compound log P<br />

1 0.99<br />

2 2.96<br />

3 <strong>3.</strong>44<br />

4 <strong>3.</strong>52<br />

5 2.84<br />

6 <strong>3.</strong>32<br />

7 <strong>3.</strong>39<br />

8 1.48<br />

9 <strong>3.</strong>45<br />

10 <strong>3.</strong>94<br />

11 4.01<br />

12 <strong>3.</strong>33<br />

13 <strong>3.</strong>81<br />

14 <strong>3.</strong>89<br />

Results<br />

The results of antifungal studies of benzimidazoles<br />

tested against Saccharomyces cerevisiae are summarized in<br />

Table III. As indicated, all the compounds show antifungal<br />

activities against the tested yeast. Consequently, compounds<br />

with high log1/c MIC are the best antifungals. The MICs were<br />

compared with Ketoconazole and Amphotericin which were<br />

screened under similar conditions as reference drugs.<br />

In order to identify the effect of lipophilicity on the<br />

inhibitory activity, QSAR studies of title compounds were performed.<br />

A set of benzimidazoles consisting of 14 molecules was<br />

used for multilinear regression model generation. The reference<br />

drugs were not included in model generation as they<br />

belong to a different structural series. An attempt has been<br />

made to find structural requirement for inhibition of Saccharomyces<br />

cerevisiae using QSAR Hansch approach on benzimidazole<br />

derivatives. To obtain the quantitative effects of the<br />

lipophilicity parameter of benzimidazole derivatives on their<br />

antifungal activity, QSAR analysis with log P was operated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!