22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

V a c u u m D i s t i l l a t i o n o f T O M E<br />

Data on amounts of obtained distillates (D1, D2), residues<br />

(Z1, Z2) and weight losses (WL) from 1 st and 2 nd distillation<br />

stage are listed in Table V and VI.<br />

Table V<br />

Vacuum Distillation material balance: 1 st stage<br />

TOME D1 Z1 WL<br />

[g] [g] [wt. %] [g] [wt. %] [wt. %]<br />

2362 845 35.8 1419 60.0 4.2<br />

Table VI<br />

Vacuum distillation material balance: 2 nd stage<br />

TOME D2 Z2 WL<br />

[g] [g] [wt. %] [g] [wt. %] [wt. %]<br />

845.3 712 84.2 101.4 12.0 <strong>3.</strong>8<br />

The prepared amount of TOME was heated and then let<br />

settle. Formed water and unreacted methanol were removed<br />

with a vacuum (molecular) evaporator.<br />

Then 2.5 dm 3 TOME was withdrawn from 3 dm 3 volume<br />

of TOME and distillated at the folowing conditions: pressure<br />

10–50 Pa and temperature 135–140 °C. 955 ml (~ 845 g) of<br />

distillate (D1) was obtained which represented ~ 38 % vol.<br />

(~ 36 % wt.). During this distillation D1 was polluted<br />

by RA.<br />

Destillate D1 955 ml (~ 845 g) was consequently distillated<br />

at pressure 2–20 Pa and temperature 130–135 °C.<br />

Under these conditions, we obtained 835 ml (711.8 g) of distillate<br />

D2, i.e. ~ 87 % vol. from D1, (84 % wt.)<br />

The total yield of these processes: from 2,500 ml TOME<br />

(2,363 g) we obtained 835 ml (711.8 g) which represented<br />

3<strong>3.</strong>4 % vol. (30.1 % wt.).<br />

Acid number parameter of D2 (19.610 mg KOH g –1 ) did<br />

not comply with European standard En 14214 for biodiesel<br />

(stipulating less than 0.5 mg KOH g –1 ), D2 had to undergo<br />

further treatment. D2 included some RA. They were neutralised<br />

and precipitated and D2 (tall oil fatty acids methyl esthers<br />

– TOFAME) after this treatment had acid number 0.3 mg<br />

KOH g –1 . This value fully meets En 14214. However, total<br />

volume of the final product decreased from 835 to 630 ml<br />

(566.6 g) which represented – when comparing to the TOME<br />

amount – 25.2 % vol., (~ 24 % wt.).<br />

The final product prepared in such a mode was subjected<br />

to analyses in laboratory of VÚRUP, which was accredited<br />

for analyses of biofuels. Results are assembled in Table VII.<br />

R e s u l t s O b t a i n e d b y F o u r i e r<br />

T r a n s f o r m I n f r a r e d S p e c t r o m e t r y<br />

( F T I R )<br />

FTIR spectra of our product and a sample of soybean<br />

oil methylesters (SOME) were scanned and were found to<br />

s554<br />

comply with En 14214. We observed very good similarity<br />

in absorption peaks of our product and SOME sample. Both<br />

spectra are almost identical. This may mean that both speci-<br />

Fig. 1. Comparison of FTIR spectra: TOFAME and SOME<br />

mens have similar physical and chemical properties.<br />

T e s t R e s u l t s f o r B i o d i e s e l f r o m<br />

Table VII<br />

Values of prepared biodiesel compared with En14214 standard<br />

values<br />

Properties Units Determined En 14214 Uncertainty<br />

value value<br />

Density at<br />

kg m –3 15 °C<br />

Carbon residue<br />

899.3 875–900 0.1 %<br />

(10% distillation wt. %<br />

residue)<br />

Kinematic<br />

< 0.010 max. 0.3 10 %<br />

mm2 s –1 viscosity<br />

at 40 °C<br />

<strong>3.</strong>932 <strong>3.</strong>5–5 1.5 %<br />

Cold filter<br />

plugging point<br />

°C –12<br />

0 to –13<br />

–13 to –20<br />

(winter)<br />

3 °C<br />

Ester content wt. % 95.7 min. 96.5 2.5<br />

Linolenic acid<br />

methyl ester<br />

wt. % 0.7 max. 12 –<br />

Sulphur<br />

mg kg –1 content<br />

1208 max. 10 2 %<br />

A c c r e d i t e d L a b o r a t o r y<br />

Conclusions<br />

Prepared tall oil was esterified by methanol at optimal<br />

conditions in the presence of acid catalyst. Tall oil fatty acids<br />

methyl esters were isolated from TOME mixture by vacuum<br />

distillation.<br />

Total yield of these processes: from 2,500 ml TOME<br />

(2,363 g), 630 ml (566.6 g) resulted which represents

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!