22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

P62 COMPARATIVE STuDy OF ThE PROTEIN<br />

COMPOSITION INDuCED by MALTING<br />

bARLEy OF TwO VARIETIES<br />

MARKéTA LAŠTOVIČKOVá, MARTInA ŠOPíKOVá<br />

and JAnETTE BOBáľOVá<br />

Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the ASCR, v.v.i., 602 00<br />

Brno, Veveří 97, Czech Republic,<br />

lastovickova@iach.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

The selection of barley cultivar has great importance for<br />

the malting and brewing industries, as well as for breeders,<br />

because malting properties and resistance of barley plant to<br />

fungal or viral diseases is cultivar-dependent. Since protein<br />

content is one of the most important barley character related<br />

to malt qualities, proteomics is ideal tool for both differentiation<br />

of barley cultivars and description of malting course.<br />

Proteomic analysis usually includes some separation technique<br />

connecting with MS and the database searches. SDS-<br />

PAGE has been commonly used as a separation step before<br />

MS analysis of proteins. Moreover, it seems to be convenient<br />

tool for the study of qualitative differences between barley<br />

cultivar. 1–3<br />

The aim of this study was the characterization of protein<br />

changes and the identification of major proteins that undergo<br />

some modifications during malting process. For these experiments<br />

two barley cultivars were selected.<br />

Experimental<br />

E x t r a c t i o n o f P r o t e i n s f r o m B a r l e y<br />

G r a i n s<br />

Barley grains in different malting degrees (cultivar “Jersey”<br />

and KM1910) were obtained from Research Institute of<br />

Brewing and Malting (Brno, Czech Republic). 50 mg of sample<br />

was mixed with 1 ml of deionized water and shaken 1 hr.<br />

The suspension was centrifuged (10 min; 13,000 rpm). The<br />

supernatant containing the proteins was lyophilized.<br />

P r o t e i n S e p a r a t i o n<br />

Lyophilized extracts were resuspended in 150 μl sampling<br />

buffer (Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad) with βmercaptoethanol,<br />

19 : 1) and denaturated (10 min, 95 °C).<br />

SDS-PAGE separations were performed on 15 % TRIS-HCl<br />

(Bio-Rad) or gradient (4–20 % TRIS-HCl, Bio-Rad) gels.<br />

The visualization was carried out by Coomassie Brilliant<br />

Blue (CBB) R-250, CBB G-250 and silver staining.<br />

P r o t e i n I d e n t i f i c a t i o n<br />

The selected proteins separated by 1-D GE were digested<br />

in-gel by chymotrypsin 4 . Obtained peptides were analyzed<br />

by MALDI-TOF MS (Applied Biosystems 4700 Proteomics<br />

Analyzer). α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA;<br />

10 mg ml –1 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile (1 : 1, v/v))<br />

was used as a MALDI matrix. Air was used as the collision<br />

gas for all MS/MS experiments. Protein identification was<br />

s712<br />

performed by searching the peptide masses and MS/MS<br />

sequence stretches against the sequence databases using the<br />

MASCOT search engine (database nCBInr).<br />

Results<br />

P r o t e i n C h a n g e s D u r i n g M a l t i n g<br />

Water-soluble proteins were extracted from barley<br />

mature grains, grains after 1–5 days of malting and from green<br />

and ready malt. 1-D GE was performed to obtain a complex<br />

characterization of changes of protein profiles during malting.<br />

The gradient gel (4–20 %) was used to acquire the results<br />

covering the largest interval of molecular masses. Since the<br />

demand for a protein staining (sensitivity, compatibility with<br />

MS) is one of the most important tasks in GE, especial attention<br />

was paid to the selection of protein visualization. Two<br />

types of CBB (R-250 and G-250) and silver staining were<br />

compared (data not shown). The best results were obtained<br />

with CBB-G of which using the differences between protein<br />

patterns during malting were distinct (Fig. 1.).<br />

A visual inspection of gradient gel confirmed significant<br />

modifications observed after three days of malting at minimal<br />

five protein bands at molecular masses about 53 kDa, 43 kDa,<br />

26 kDa, and 23 kDa (see arrows in Fig. 1.). The major changes<br />

were noticed at the band with molecular mass about<br />

43 kDa. Therefore it was cut out, digested by chymotrypsin<br />

and obtained mixture of peptides was subjected to MS and<br />

MS/MS analyses (Fig. 2. a, b). Database searching revealed<br />

its identity as Protein Z (gi/131091). This protein is important<br />

for the brewers, because due to its posttranslational modifications<br />

(glycations) influence the sensory and technological<br />

properties of beer (e.g. foam).<br />

P r o t e i n P a t t e r n f o r D i f f e r e n t<br />

B a r l e y C u l t i v a r s<br />

Extracts from mature grains and malt of two different<br />

varieties, Jersey and KM, were separated via 15 % 1-D SDS-<br />

Fig. 1. Cbb-G stained gradient 1-D SDS gel of protein extracts<br />

from mature grains (Lane 2), one day malting grains (Lane 3),<br />

two days malting grains (Lane 4), three days malting grains<br />

(Lane 5), four days malting grains (Lane 6), five days malting<br />

grains (Lane 7), green malt (Lane 8) and ready malt (Line 9).<br />

Molecular weight markers are in Lanes 1 and 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!