22.12.2012 Views

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

3. FOOD ChEMISTRy & bIOTEChNOLOGy 3.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Food Chemistry & Biotechnology<br />

3<br />

1 – Aeration<br />

2 – Stock bottle with mineral medium<br />

3 – Pump<br />

1 - Aeration<br />

4 – Flow Cell FC 81<br />

2 - Stock bottle with mineral medium<br />

Fig. 3 - 2. Pump Scheme of the FC 81 Flow Cell connection during the<br />

experiment 4 - Flow cell FC 81<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1<br />

2 3<br />

1 – Cover Glass<br />

1 - Cover 2 – Slide glass<br />

4 – Space for medium flow<br />

2 - Slide 3 – Cellophane 5 – Parts of the flow cell<br />

3 - Cellophane<br />

Fig. <strong>3.</strong> Cross-section of the FC 81 Flow Cell<br />

4 - Space for medium flow<br />

5 - Parts of the flow cell<br />

Results<br />

C h a r a c t e r o f C e l l E n v e l o p e s o f<br />

T r i c h o s p o r o n C u t a n e u m<br />

The results obtained by MATH method are summarized<br />

in Table I. The cell envelopes of the population Trichosporon<br />

cutaneum grown in the presence of filter paper had the most<br />

4<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Table II<br />

Influence of shear stress on the cellophane colonization and object morphology changes<br />

5<br />

5<br />

1<br />

s655<br />

Table I<br />

Hydrophobity of cell envelopes in dependence on using different<br />

types of cellulosic substrates as sole of carbon<br />

Cellulosic substrate Cell hydrofobity [%]<br />

filter paper 8<strong>3.</strong>8<br />

cellophane 51.8<br />

carboxymethylcellulose 76.4<br />

hydroxyethylcellulose 79.3<br />

Sigmacell Type 101 9.6<br />

Fig. 4. Cells of Trichosporon cutaneum attached on cellophane<br />

(phase contrast)<br />

hydrophobic character (8<strong>3.</strong>8 %), whereas the population cultivated<br />

on Sigmacell had very hydrophilic cell surfaces. The<br />

hydrophobity of cellophane stripes (95.6 %) was determined<br />

at Department of Polymers, ICT Prague. We wanted to choose<br />

cells with similar surface characters as the cellophane<br />

stripes. Filter paper could not be used for biomass preparation<br />

because of low biomass concentration. For this reason<br />

HEC was used for following experiments.<br />

I n f l u e n c e o f S h e a r S t r e s s o n<br />

C e l l o p h a n e C o l o n i z a t i o n<br />

Low flow rates of medium are less favourable for<br />

the cellophane colonization (Table II). Also small areas<br />

Flow rate [ml min –1 ] Colonized area [%] Objects in field Area [μm 2 ] Lenght [μm] Width [μm] Elongation*<br />

2 4.86 12 180.98 27.92 5.94 1.76<br />

4 4.42 12 176.64 24.00 6.33 1.81<br />

6 16.07 27 194.27 29.56 5.40 1.76<br />

8 8.49 40 80.42 15.02 5.01 1.69<br />

10 4.25 21 97.32 15.69 5.50 1.74<br />

15 2.38 15 86.32 15.79 5.25 1.97<br />

20 6.08 24 117.22 20.90 5.65 2.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!