22.12.2012 Views

6 Wood Discoloration

6 Wood Discoloration

6 Wood Discoloration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 5 Damages by Viruses and Bacteria<br />

shows beech wood microtome sections whose lignin content have been reduced<br />

from naturally (21%) to about 19% and which subsequently had been used as<br />

the only carbon source for bacteria in liquid cultures. The microtome section in<br />

Fig. 5.2a represents the non-inoculated control. The section in Fig. 5.2b shows<br />

that only the highly lignified middle lamella primary wall region resisted to<br />

the bacterium Cellulomonas flavigena Kellerman and McBeth. However, the<br />

bacteria only consumed the carbohydrates of the pretreated wood. The lignin,<br />

which was dissociated from the pretreated woody cell wall by the bacteria, was<br />

not respired but was refound in the nutrient liquid, suggesting that lignin is<br />

a “ballast” to these bacteria that inhibits the dissimilation of the wood carbohydrates.<br />

The action of the chlorite pretreatment was assumed to result from<br />

the “opening” of the close association between carbohydrates and lignin in the<br />

woody cell wall so that the carbohydrates became accessible to the bacteria.<br />

Decay may have not been due to the reduction of the lignin content, because<br />

bacteria did not attack natural beech wood with 21% lignin content, but degraded<br />

pretreated Scots pine samples with a higher lignin content of about<br />

23% (Schmidt and Bauch 1980).<br />

Several bacteria were isolated from sawn Liriodendron tulipifera lumber already<br />

after 2 months of stacking (Mikluscak and Dawson-Andoh 2004a). After<br />

longer wood exposition under natural conditions, like in soil, or lakes and<br />

marine environment, the lignified cell wall was degraded by mixed populations<br />

and obviously the hurdle of the lignin barrier was cleared (Liese 1950;<br />

Liese and Karnop 1968; Schmidt et al. 1987; Fig. 5.3a). Dependent on the decay<br />

type within the wood cell wall, cavity, erosion, and tunneling bacteria<br />

were distinguished (Singh and Butcher 1991; Nilsson et al. 1992; Singh et al.<br />

1992; Daniel 2003). The two first types resemble the soft-rot types 1 and 2<br />

(Chap. 7.3). The tunneling bacteria are qualified by means of slime sheats to<br />

a gliding movement inside cell wall concavities created by themselves. The<br />

aggregates of the tunneling bacteria subcultured from the woody samples consisted<br />

of different bacterial species (Nilsson and Daniel 1992; Nilsson et al.<br />

1992).<br />

Aureobacterium luteolum Yokota et al. isolated from pond water caused erosions<br />

in the secondary wall in microtome sections of pine sapwood as substrate<br />

in 1 month of incubation, that is, bacterial wood degradation occurred obviously<br />

also by a pure culture under laboratory conditions (Schmidt et al. 1995;<br />

Fig. 5.3c). The result was however not reproducible using another strain of A.<br />

luteolum (Nilsson pers. comm.).<br />

In contrast to the xylem of healthy trees, which was rather “sterile”, wood<br />

samples from forest dieback sites contained several bacteria (Schmidt 1985;<br />

Schmidt et al. 1986). In view of the forest damage by pollution, bacteria (including<br />

RLOs and MLOs) were however assumed to be no causal agents, but<br />

rather, apart from other influences (emissions, climate, location), predisposing<br />

factors, or secondary parasites of the weakened trees.<br />

www.taq.ir

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!