22.12.2012 Views

The Ongoing Transformation of the McDonald's Logo - Ohio University

The Ongoing Transformation of the McDonald's Logo - Ohio University

The Ongoing Transformation of the McDonald's Logo - Ohio University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

interpretation and methods <strong>of</strong> cognition. Peirce’s model is one <strong>of</strong> two influential<br />

paradigms that have been employed for semiotic analyses <strong>of</strong> consumer and<br />

marketing issues. <strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r paradigm is <strong>the</strong> Saussurean model (Nöth, 1990;<br />

Pinson, 1988; 1993). Saussure’s (1986 [1916]) paradigm is rooted in language,<br />

and is principally centered around arbitrary codes (Mick, Burroughs, Hetzel,<br />

& Brannen, 2004). As opposed to Saussure’s (1986 [1916]), Peirce’s semiotics<br />

transcends this model, as demonstrated by his “representamen-objectinterpretant”<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sign.<br />

Representamen<br />

Based on Peirce’s “representamen-object-interpretant” model, <strong>the</strong><br />

representamen is <strong>the</strong> actual sign itself. A sign is what stands for something<br />

else: an object or a concept (Eco, 1979, 1986; Hoopes, 1991). Representamen<br />

signifies representation, something that represents something else – as it would<br />

to a viewer’s interpreting mind (Peirce, 1958 [1931]). <strong>The</strong> representamen<br />

has meaning to someone; it forms in <strong>the</strong> viewer’s mind a corresponding<br />

image, or perhaps a more developed meaning (Peirce, 1958 [1931]). <strong>The</strong><br />

representamen stands for an object (Popper, Shearmur, & Turner, 2008). <strong>The</strong><br />

notion <strong>of</strong> “representamen” is analogous to Saussure’s “signifier” (see next<br />

section) (Silverman, 1983). A representamen functions to “mean” something<br />

in an interpreting mind. From this vantage point, it can be best described as<br />

something which represents (Peirce, 1958 [1931]).<br />

Peirce designates three distinct kinds <strong>of</strong> signs: iconic, indexical, and<br />

symbolic signs. Iconic signs are imitative representations that are explicit;<br />

<strong>the</strong>y represent what <strong>the</strong>y represent at face value. For instance, a triangle is<br />

a geometrical icon. Indexical signs symbolize and involve cause-and-effect<br />

relationships, or physical connections (Johansen & Larsen, 2002; Neumann-<br />

Held & Rehmann-Sutter, 2006). As such, a footprint indicates an individual<br />

having walked by. Similarly, bullet holes in a piece <strong>of</strong> wood indicate that<br />

a gunshot took place. An indexical sign represents evidence <strong>of</strong> something.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> symbolic sign (e.g., colors or a given flag), <strong>the</strong> meaning – that is, <strong>the</strong><br />

sign-object relation – is arbitrary, in <strong>the</strong> same way that language is open to<br />

interpretation (Peirce, 1958 [1931]).<br />

Object<br />

<strong>The</strong> sign symbolizes its object. For a representamen to exist, it must<br />

be representative <strong>of</strong> something else: an object. According to Peirce (1958<br />

[1931]), an object is something from which someone can derive meaning.<br />

This is consistent with Saussure’s (1986 [1916]) signified. This sign, on <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, is closely connected to Saussure’s signifier. <strong>The</strong> object, <strong>the</strong>n, is<br />

Cowin & Matusitz - <strong>The</strong> <strong>Ongoing</strong> <strong>Transformation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> McDonald’s...<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!