The Ongoing Transformation of the McDonald's Logo - Ohio University
The Ongoing Transformation of the McDonald's Logo - Ohio University
The Ongoing Transformation of the McDonald's Logo - Ohio University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
interpretation and methods <strong>of</strong> cognition. Peirce’s model is one <strong>of</strong> two influential<br />
paradigms that have been employed for semiotic analyses <strong>of</strong> consumer and<br />
marketing issues. <strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r paradigm is <strong>the</strong> Saussurean model (Nöth, 1990;<br />
Pinson, 1988; 1993). Saussure’s (1986 [1916]) paradigm is rooted in language,<br />
and is principally centered around arbitrary codes (Mick, Burroughs, Hetzel,<br />
& Brannen, 2004). As opposed to Saussure’s (1986 [1916]), Peirce’s semiotics<br />
transcends this model, as demonstrated by his “representamen-objectinterpretant”<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sign.<br />
Representamen<br />
Based on Peirce’s “representamen-object-interpretant” model, <strong>the</strong><br />
representamen is <strong>the</strong> actual sign itself. A sign is what stands for something<br />
else: an object or a concept (Eco, 1979, 1986; Hoopes, 1991). Representamen<br />
signifies representation, something that represents something else – as it would<br />
to a viewer’s interpreting mind (Peirce, 1958 [1931]). <strong>The</strong> representamen<br />
has meaning to someone; it forms in <strong>the</strong> viewer’s mind a corresponding<br />
image, or perhaps a more developed meaning (Peirce, 1958 [1931]). <strong>The</strong><br />
representamen stands for an object (Popper, Shearmur, & Turner, 2008). <strong>The</strong><br />
notion <strong>of</strong> “representamen” is analogous to Saussure’s “signifier” (see next<br />
section) (Silverman, 1983). A representamen functions to “mean” something<br />
in an interpreting mind. From this vantage point, it can be best described as<br />
something which represents (Peirce, 1958 [1931]).<br />
Peirce designates three distinct kinds <strong>of</strong> signs: iconic, indexical, and<br />
symbolic signs. Iconic signs are imitative representations that are explicit;<br />
<strong>the</strong>y represent what <strong>the</strong>y represent at face value. For instance, a triangle is<br />
a geometrical icon. Indexical signs symbolize and involve cause-and-effect<br />
relationships, or physical connections (Johansen & Larsen, 2002; Neumann-<br />
Held & Rehmann-Sutter, 2006). As such, a footprint indicates an individual<br />
having walked by. Similarly, bullet holes in a piece <strong>of</strong> wood indicate that<br />
a gunshot took place. An indexical sign represents evidence <strong>of</strong> something.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> symbolic sign (e.g., colors or a given flag), <strong>the</strong> meaning – that is, <strong>the</strong><br />
sign-object relation – is arbitrary, in <strong>the</strong> same way that language is open to<br />
interpretation (Peirce, 1958 [1931]).<br />
Object<br />
<strong>The</strong> sign symbolizes its object. For a representamen to exist, it must<br />
be representative <strong>of</strong> something else: an object. According to Peirce (1958<br />
[1931]), an object is something from which someone can derive meaning.<br />
This is consistent with Saussure’s (1986 [1916]) signified. This sign, on <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r hand, is closely connected to Saussure’s signifier. <strong>The</strong> object, <strong>the</strong>n, is<br />
Cowin & Matusitz - <strong>The</strong> <strong>Ongoing</strong> <strong>Transformation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> McDonald’s...<br />
25