22.12.2012 Views

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Impersonal Trust in B2B Electronic Commerce: A Process View 249<br />

potential short-term benefits. Hence, the calculative process can be invoked by<br />

monitoring, which is proposed to be associated with impersonal trust.<br />

Legal Bonds<br />

Written contracts are also proposed as a mechanism to reduce opportunistic<br />

behavior and moral hazard. However, contracts are only partial safeguards against<br />

opportunism since they are almost always incomplete due to unforeseen circumstances,<br />

since firms are considered boundedly rational and cannot foresee all<br />

possible states of nature (Williamson, 1985). Nevertheless, impersonal trust based<br />

on legal bonds can be built on the basis of the calculative process since it is rational<br />

to cooperate given a legal contract that increases the costs of opportunism.<br />

Therefore, legal bonds provide protection and can promote trust in a firm’s<br />

credibility.<br />

Consequences of Impersonal Trust<br />

Satisfaction<br />

According to Anderson and Narus (1990), satisfaction is conceptualized as<br />

a very important consequence of exchange relationships, showing that satisfaction<br />

is an outcome of trust-based relationships. Mutual trust indicates equity in the<br />

exchange and promotes satisfaction. Moreover, trust enhances channel member<br />

satisfaction by reducing conflict (Anderson and Narus, 1990; Geyskens et al.,<br />

1998). In summary, satisfaction represents an important outcome of business<br />

exchange relations and a global evaluation of fulfillment exchanges relationships<br />

(Dwyer et al., 1987), in which both dimensions of trust should contribute. Following<br />

Ganesan (1994), there should be a positive relationship between satisfaction and<br />

impersonal trust.<br />

Perceived Risk<br />

Most buyer-supplier relationships are characterized by information asymmetry<br />

since one firm usually possesses uneven information regarding the transaction<br />

compared to the other firm (Mishra et al., 1998). The general problem faced by<br />

organizations is the inability to foresee and control the actions of the other firm,<br />

leading to delegation of some authority to the other party. This problem creates a<br />

double-sided agency relationship between the buyer and the supplier (Jensen and<br />

Meckling, 1976). According to Shapiro (1987), agency relationships are present<br />

in all types of social relationships from simply familiarity interactions to complex<br />

forms of a firm. Although risk is inevitable in every transaction, trust reduces the<br />

expectations of opportunistic behavior (Sako and Helper, 1998) and risk perceptions<br />

(Ganesan, 1994). Trust has been shown to reduce the perceived risk of being<br />

Copyright © 2003, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written<br />

permission of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!