22.12.2012 Views

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

246 Pavlou<br />

long as there is adequate information to perceive competence, this impersonal trustbuilding<br />

process can become the groundwork of a trustworthy relationship.<br />

Therefore, the capability process of engendering trust may develop in eCommerce<br />

to promote trust in a firm’s credibility.<br />

Transference Process<br />

Can I trust a firm based on its performance in prior transactions with others?<br />

The institutional source of trust is associated with structural arrangements that build<br />

trust through incentive mechanisms (Shapiro, 1987). Trust can be gained based on<br />

reliable information received from a trusted <strong>net</strong>work of firms, suggesting that trust<br />

can be transferred from one buyer to another, even if the trustor has no other<br />

experience. A firm may employ the cognitive transference process (Doney and<br />

Cannon, 1997) to analyze information from other firms to form its trust perceptions.<br />

Therefore, given a trustworthy <strong>net</strong>work of firms, the transference process of<br />

engendering trust can become another element of impersonal trust and build trust<br />

in a firm’s credibility.<br />

Calculative Process<br />

Can I trust a firm based on a calculation of its costs and benefits of cooperating?<br />

The economics literature suggests that the primary source of trust is based on a<br />

buyer’s sober calculation of the other firm’s cost and benefits of cheating (Dasgupta,<br />

1988). Hence, trust involves a calculative process that a buyer assesses the<br />

potential losses compared to the short-term gains of a firm’s non-cooperative<br />

behavior (Doney and Cannon, 1997). This process suggests that as long as it is<br />

irrational for a firm to cheat, it can be trusted since it is to its advantage to cooperate.<br />

Therefore, the calculative process can become another constituent of trustworthy<br />

transactions. This subjective calculation has different implications for the two<br />

dimensions of trust. While a firm’s credibility can be trusted, benevolence cannot<br />

be generated based on the calculative process. According to the definition of<br />

benevolence, the other firm is expected to cooperate, even given the chance<br />

(greater benefits) of cheating; hence, the calculative process will always suggest that<br />

a firm’s benevolence cannot be trusted because the benefits of cheating given the<br />

chance would always be greater. Therefore, the trust-building calculative process<br />

can build trust in a firm’s credibility.<br />

Antecedents of Impersonal Trust in B2B eCommerce<br />

An increasingly important application of interfirm eCommerce is the B2B<br />

exchange, which is an interorganizational information system (IOIS) through which<br />

multiple firms interact to identify and select partners, negotiate and execute<br />

Copyright © 2003, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written<br />

permission of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!