22.12.2012 Views

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

224 Henderson, Snyder and Byrd<br />

computer attitudes provide support for the direct paths that were added to the model<br />

(Agarwal & Prasad, 1999; Harrison & Rainer, 1992).<br />

The final model fit the data quite well (� 2 = 49.71, GFI = 0.95, AGFI = 0.89,<br />

CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.06), as illustrated in Table 2, giving evidence that the model<br />

is supported. Table 3 illustrates the standardized coefficients and t-values for the<br />

paths between the antecedent variables and the PRIVCON and ACTUAL variables.<br />

All the covariances between the antecedent variables were significant (see Table 4).<br />

Tests of Hypotheses<br />

As with prior research, consumers are concerned about the protection of their<br />

personally identifiable information. The mean of the privacy concern measure was<br />

3.76, where 1 = Strongly Disagree and 5 = Strongly Agree. The first four items of<br />

the measure resulted in more concern than the remaining three. The mean for the<br />

first four questions was 4.28, indicating a stronger concern with the protection of<br />

consumer personal information.<br />

A list of the hypotheses and results can be found in Table 5. H1 was not<br />

supported (coefficient = -.056, t = .804). Higher levels of privacy concerns<br />

negatively impact actual e-commerce activity, however the results were not significantly<br />

significant. H2 was supported (coefficient = .145, t = 2.257). Support for H2<br />

indicates that if the consumer feels that the benefits of using the Inter<strong>net</strong> are<br />

sufficient, he or she will provide personal information and continue to participate<br />

in e-commerce activities despite any privacy concerns. There was strong support<br />

for H3 (coefficient = .425, t = 6.597). The results indicate that if a consumer is likely<br />

to buy goods and/or services sight unseen, it does not matter if the medium is the<br />

telephone, the mail, or the Inter<strong>net</strong>.<br />

H4 was supported (coefficient = .424, t =6.195), indicating that as consumers<br />

are more concerned with the vulnerability of their personal information, the greater<br />

they perceive the importance of privacy policies. An additional finding from the<br />

final model shows a significant negative relationship between gender and the<br />

perceived importance of the privacy policy (coefficient = -.224, t = 3.145). The IBM<br />

study found that males place more importance on an organization’s privacy policy<br />

(Louis et al., 1999). Technology knowledge was also found to impact the importance<br />

of privacy policies (coefficient = -.165, t = 2.296). H5 was not supported (coefficient<br />

= -.129, t = 1.804). Actual e-commerce usage does not significantly impact the<br />

perceived importance of an organization’s privacy policy.<br />

The findings indicate that H6 was supported (coefficient = .264, t = 3.589). As<br />

consumers become more concerned with the protection of their personal data, they<br />

become more likely to prefer governmental regulation to industry self-regulation.<br />

Another finding that was not hypothesized was the significant relationship between<br />

the actual e-commerce activity and regulatory preferences (coefficient = .153, t =<br />

2.060). This possibly indicates that if a consumer provides personal information to a<br />

Web site, he or she would prefer stronger laws–as opposed to self-regulation–to<br />

ensure that the personal information is protected.<br />

Copyright © 2003, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written<br />

permission of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!