22.12.2012 Views

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206 Mullany and Lay<br />

resistant than others to the analyst’s new systems. All sets of readings for these<br />

hypotheses tested normal. The results showed no support for these beliefs (at p =<br />

0.100) either, and they are also rejected by this study.<br />

Unfair discrimination of older employees, as suggested by Rosen and Jerdee,<br />

might occur in the IS area to older users. Such discrimination could well be<br />

motivated by studies such as Bruwer’s, which suggest, inter alia, that older and<br />

longer-serving personnel are most resistant to new computer systems. Attention is<br />

drawn to the fact that neither the present study nor A-I theory, nor the literature<br />

survey by Rosen and Jerdee support these beliefs. Unfair discrimination could<br />

certainly cost both individuals and organizations dearly in terms of unnecessary<br />

retrenchment and/ or transfer of experienced staff.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Subject to the postulate that the user R-score is a legitimate measure of user<br />

resistance, certain causes and impacts of user resistance have been demonstrated<br />

by this study. It has been shown that matching analysts and users of similar cognitive<br />

styles can minimize user resistance. However, care is suggested in applying such a<br />

policy indiscriminately, since there may be disadvantages in so doing despite this<br />

study’s failure to show any. The high degree of association between user R-scores<br />

and absolute analyst-user KAI score differences permits approximate forecasts of<br />

the former given the latter.<br />

Two phenomena associated with analyst-user dyads where the analyst is the<br />

more innovative, were implied by the results. The first of these is a tendency for the<br />

user to view the analyst as brief and confident, seldom wasting time on side issues.<br />

The second is (less convincingly) that the user may comment on the unexpected<br />

speed with which the analyst comprehends system requirements or specifications.<br />

It is suggested that these features be noted as diagnostic signs of the more innovative<br />

nature of the analyst, especially in situations where formal testing has not or cannot<br />

be conducted. This study finds in favor of the hypotheses that perceived accuracy<br />

and reliability of the system are associated with lower user resistance. Consequently,<br />

further insights may be gained into a given user-analyst dyad by questioning<br />

the user on the accuracy and reliability of a system. For example, the less accurate<br />

and less reliable a user considers a system, the more user resistance can be<br />

expected, and consequently (from hypothesis HI), the greater the analyst-user<br />

cognitive style difference is likely to be.<br />

There is no support for the beliefs that the ages and lengths of service of users<br />

are associated with user resistance: or for the alternative beliefs that users who differ<br />

Copyright © 2003, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written<br />

permission of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!