22.12.2012 Views

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

www.sharexxx.net - free books & magazines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194 Mullany and Lay<br />

an innovative analyst, when dealing with an adaptive user, will tend to follow his own<br />

ideas rather than to pay over-much attention to the user. The adaptor, prone to high<br />

self-doubt, would be expected to give in to the analyst’s views. Hence:<br />

H2(b): The analyst-user KAI score difference is positively associated<br />

with the user’s seven-point rating of the extent to which the analyst<br />

followed his own ideas and/or ignored the user’s opinions<br />

Innovators, with the predilection for novelty, would be expected to add to the<br />

system development effort extraneous features, which the more adaptive user<br />

would consider unnecessary and time wasting. This suggested the hypothesis:<br />

H2(c): The analyst-user KAI score difference is positively associated<br />

with the user’s seven-pointrating of the extent to which the analyst<br />

wasted time on peripheral issues<br />

Innovators are often seen as abrasive, creating dissonance. Hence, a measure<br />

of dissonance would be expected to exist between individuals who differ markedly<br />

in cognitive style. In addition, Bailey and Pearson (1983) found that a user’s<br />

relationship with the IS staff, as well as the attitude of the IS staff, influenced user<br />

satisfaction. By “attitude”, Bailey and Pearson were referring to the analyst’s<br />

willingness to assist the user. It is doubtful that a user would report friction between<br />

himself and the analyst, and then describe their relationship as sound, and the analyst<br />

as helpful. Consequently, the user’s ratings of these three factors should be highly<br />

correlated. To test this, the following hypothesis was specified:<br />

H2(d): The absolute analyst-user KAI score difference is negatively<br />

associated with the user’s seven-point rating of his relationship with the<br />

analyst<br />

The key factors thought by Pearson to play a role in user satisfaction were<br />

identified earlier. As it is of interest to see how their approaches compared with that<br />

of this study, a short-list of user-satisfaction factors was drawn up. Negative<br />

associations were then postulated between these factors and the R-score. The<br />

hypotheses tested in respect of the above were thus:<br />

H3(a): There is a negative association between the user’s R-score and his<br />

seven-point rating of the system’s level of accuracy<br />

Copyright © 2003, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written<br />

permission of Idea Group Inc. is prohibited.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!