19.07.2020 Views

Womb as Paradise Lost

Dissertation 2015. Womb as Paradise Lost - Regained by the Energy of Life. My name is Dr. Gideon Benavraham, professor-emeritus Clinical Hermeneutics. "What happens in a human being fundamentally during the proces of prenatal development (Fetal Programming) and what are the consequences to distortions and diseases later on life?" Research tools: Mindlink-Tesla-Transformation Technology (MTTT) as diagnosticum with PEMF and music frequencies as treatment methods. A RCT-double blind and placebo-controlled research, with statistics.

Dissertation 2015. Womb as Paradise Lost - Regained by the Energy of Life.
My name is Dr. Gideon Benavraham, professor-emeritus Clinical Hermeneutics. "What happens in a human being fundamentally during the proces of prenatal development (Fetal Programming) and what are the consequences to distortions and diseases later on life?" Research tools: Mindlink-Tesla-Transformation Technology (MTTT) as diagnosticum with PEMF and music frequencies as treatment methods. A RCT-double blind and placebo-controlled research, with statistics.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal Programming

478

Practical Part – Mindlink sysrtem: “Concluding Remarks”

ence is clear. The experience can’t be examined only because the experience as

phenomenon is personally and consequently not repeatable even if the differences

are to close to call. The cause of this matter is categorical and change is a constant

factor because of the dynamic character of the human existence. Therefore

the object of research isn’t the experience only but the theory of the experience

and the structure of the experience. The basic-structure of the Mindlink-system

wants to comply both of these requirements. Nevertheless, the Mindlinktestpraxis

emphasises an individual and strictly personal approach. That however still

results in a changing outcome, causing a systemic equation. Comparable individual

solutions are excluded from a scientific description because of differences and

the emphasise on the repeatability, one of the stronger requirements for acknowledgment

of scientific validity.

26.1 Mindlink-system, a sociological model

In a sociological sense it is impossible to count unique people, without stripping

their loner munity. In medical and therapeutic terms does it mean a group treatment

is possible, but not before founding a equitation denominator based on the

confluence of the complaints. So we have to collect a group of patients with the

same symptoms. After this sociological and fundamental decision, we can start a

group dynamical treatment and treating the disorders or complaints.

To be treated individuality the patient has to leave the group, stopping participation

within the collectivistic experiments. The consequently sociological conclusion

must be: actually any research and treatment is an n=1 research. In a small

investigation of a n=1-structure – like the case of Lotte – the outcome touches

only the single participant, excluding any generalisation.

Is this sociological approach the moment of breaking down any possibility of

repeatability? This depends on the definition of repeatability, as we shall see.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!