Womb as Paradise Lost
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

Womb as Paradise Lost

Dissertation 2015. Womb as Paradise Lost - Regained by the Energy of Life. My name is Dr. Gideon Benavraham, professor-emeritus Clinical Hermeneutics. "What happens in a human being fundamentally during the proces of prenatal development (Fetal Programming) and what are the consequences to distortions and diseases later on life?" Research tools: Mindlink-Tesla-Transformation Technology (MTTT) as diagnosticum with PEMF and music frequencies as treatment methods. A RCT-double blind and placebo-controlled research, with statistics. Dissertation 2015. Womb as Paradise Lost - Regained by the Energy of Life.
My name is Dr. Gideon Benavraham, professor-emeritus Clinical Hermeneutics. "What happens in a human being fundamentally during the proces of prenatal development (Fetal Programming) and what are the consequences to distortions and diseases later on life?" Research tools: Mindlink-Tesla-Transformation Technology (MTTT) as diagnosticum with PEMF and music frequencies as treatment methods. A RCT-double blind and placebo-controlled research, with statistics.

aavgideon
19.07.2020 Views

Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal ProgrammingThetic Part – Medical power in a narcissistic culture232the current therapeutic approach is the view that schizophrenia is a disease proneto chronicity, often accompanied by significant limitations in cognitive, emotionaland social. These restrictions justify a rehabilitation approach. The futility oftreating the disease, such a statement within the biological approach will be onlyreally justified as the embodiment of a mental disorder to a "disease" within thedefinition of nosology - the theory of medicine - is included and, as such, hasbeen established by neurophysiological studies. Until then, the idea ofschizophrenia may be a genetic disease, which is incurable and has degenerativecharacter, but is not proved. Treating the disease is “futile", is a pragmatic conclusion,which rests in the normativity of the institutions and not on medical objectivity”.That is the debate surrounding the new DSM-V. From this pragmaticbasis, we can draw the following conclusion, contently following Van den Boschsaying:"It is not about the disappearance of the 'disease', but to limit the effects of thedisorder, learning to deal with the constraints and the processing of this reality bypatient and family (...) it's about the resilience of increase patient and his socialnetwork with (...) shall not forget that patients develop all kinds of methods tomaintain itself, to suppress symptoms and possibly prevent by coping methods(...) cerebral and genetic vulnerability is permanent and difficult to change”. 227We need to understand the vulnerabilities mentioned here as the necessary geneticfactor which is presupposed for the construction of the disorder. Without thisvulnerability a predisposition to schizophrenia will not necessarily lead to thiseffect.Here is a note from Dr. Jos de Kroon concerning de-institutionalization of psychiatryin the ‘60s of last century USA, which was the malleability of society,central and still in the technological optimism of that era schizophrenia always227 ibid. 156

Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal ProgrammingThetic Part – Medical power in a narcissistic culture233called a brain disease founded with historical certainty (Kraepelin and Bleuler),which soon will be overcome by technological progress. De Kroon says:"Madness, psychosis or schizophrenia is a brain disease has to be called a “medicalmagic trick” that will reveal themselves in the future." 22813.4 DSM-V, a deep disappointmentWe will follow the international press regarding the published research on thescientific reliability of the DSM-V.Under the headline "The diagnose madness or DSM-V" denounced the Internetmagazine Time Magazine the "bragging" of the APA that the DSM-V "rigorousand evidence-based “ whereas it just discusses the inclusion of disorders such asbitterness, apathy, excessive shopping, and overuse of the internet.Time Magazine poses the question whether "a thousand Ph.D's gathered at a dozenconferences” ever really can fathom the meaning of vague symptoms such asfatigue, low self-esteem and feelings of hopelessness. The "sit around the Table‘'-method should still be called “science”, suggested Time Magazine. The qualification"scientific" would only connect to the DSM-V if the book should be constructedon strong neurobiological evidence. And that is lacking right now.CommentaryWe can reasonably assume that the term 'evidence-based' is absolute realism inpsychiatry and has lost the conventional medical care models, now they are finallyopening of proceedings and must face that the firm, authorized claims which228 Kroon, Dr.Jos de, on citation page 174

Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal Programming

Thetic Part – Medical power in a narcissistic culture

232

the current therapeutic approach is the view that schizophrenia is a disease prone

to chronicity, often accompanied by significant limitations in cognitive, emotional

and social. These restrictions justify a rehabilitation approach. The futility of

treating the disease, such a statement within the biological approach will be only

really justified as the embodiment of a mental disorder to a "disease" within the

definition of nosology - the theory of medicine - is included and, as such, has

been established by neurophysiological studies. Until then, the idea of

schizophrenia may be a genetic disease, which is incurable and has degenerative

character, but is not proved. Treating the disease is “futile", is a pragmatic conclusion,

which rests in the normativity of the institutions and not on medical objectivity”.

That is the debate surrounding the new DSM-V. From this pragmatic

basis, we can draw the following conclusion, contently following Van den Bosch

saying:

"It is not about the disappearance of the 'disease', but to limit the effects of the

disorder, learning to deal with the constraints and the processing of this reality by

patient and family (...) it's about the resilience of increase patient and his social

network with (...) shall not forget that patients develop all kinds of methods to

maintain itself, to suppress symptoms and possibly prevent by coping methods

(...) cerebral and genetic vulnerability is permanent and difficult to change”. 227

We need to understand the vulnerabilities mentioned here as the necessary genetic

factor which is presupposed for the construction of the disorder. Without this

vulnerability a predisposition to schizophrenia will not necessarily lead to this

effect.

Here is a note from Dr. Jos de Kroon concerning de-institutionalization of psychiatry

in the ‘60s of last century USA, which was the malleability of society,

central and still in the technological optimism of that era schizophrenia always

227 ibid. 156

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!