Womb as Paradise Lost
Dissertation 2015. Womb as Paradise Lost - Regained by the Energy of Life.
My name is Dr. Gideon Benavraham, professor-emeritus Clinical Hermeneutics. "What happens in a human being fundamentally during the proces of prenatal development (Fetal Programming) and what are the consequences to distortions and diseases later on life?" Research tools: Mindlink-Tesla-Transformation Technology (MTTT) as diagnosticum with PEMF and music frequencies as treatment methods. A RCT-double blind and placebo-controlled research, with statistics.
Dissertation 2015. Womb as Paradise Lost - Regained by the Energy of Life.
My name is Dr. Gideon Benavraham, professor-emeritus Clinical Hermeneutics. "What happens in a human being fundamentally during the proces of prenatal development (Fetal Programming) and what are the consequences to distortions and diseases later on life?" Research tools: Mindlink-Tesla-Transformation Technology (MTTT) as diagnosticum with PEMF and music frequencies as treatment methods. A RCT-double blind and placebo-controlled research, with statistics.
Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal ProgrammingThetic Part 2 – Prolegomena130Ein Sof, Elohiem and YHWH, as an Absolute unity, constitute the Ultimate Corefor the evolution of creation and culture. In this research they are indicated nontheologicallyas G’d. 112 When in this study I speak of G’d, he/she/it is the philosophical“You” of the Transcendent and the Immanent, a non-sexist and anthropomorphicindication as he, she or it, with which we refer to the Source. 113In this study, they are present as Supporting Instances, Sources of Creative energy,that have everything to do with medicine, therapy and coaching.In this respect Spinoza plays an important role because of his relationship to Taoism.To my research, his view on nature is indispensable and not to be overestimatedin the argumentation for medical philosophy.We conclude this general introduction with the remark that Hebrew language willrelate us to modern natural sciences and quantum-mechanics. With that, Tanakhbecomes a book that specifically establishes a basis for the ultimate questions ofbeginning and end, of man and creation, without getting bogged down in traditional,dogmatic religiousness.How is that possible? Well, because Hebrew is an alphanumeric language. Everyletter has a numerical value. As cultural history has demonstrated, calculating isolder than language. Telling stories is an ancient activity, but the numerical proportionsunderneath the story constitute a more reliable basis for interpretationand understanding. Not for nothing, mathematics is the universal language ofscience. Logo-technics and analysis of the numerical structures that constitute thelinguistic architecture of Tanakh, will uncover the juxtaposition between naturalsciences and Tanakh, so that there is no more contradiction, but equilibrium.112 Maimonides has emphasized as quintessence the body- and imageless-ness of G’d in his 13 articles of faith. Therefore,in our research the source of knowledge we occasionally indicate with G’d, is “dynamic creating Energy”: the PrimaryBeing or Ein Sof.113 With this I did not want to create a contradiction to Pascal, who differentiates between the G’d of Abraham and theGod of the philosophers. This dualism tends too much to Descartes, who was justly opposed by Spinoza’s monism.
Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal ProgrammingThetic Part 2 – Prolegomena131Logo-technical analysis systematically connects with mathematics i.a. Pythagoras’sand knows the set theory as a signifying phenomenon.6.2 TJM in European historyJewish medicine shows ethical and cultural similarities with subsequent medicinein Europe and the USA. Therefore I join Shyrock’s statement: “The history ofmedicine not only has a biological side, but also a social and an economic side; itis one of the central themes in human experience”. 114Albert S. Lysons, in the History of Medicine, writes some things about Jewishmedicine that are important to my research, but they do not cover more than twopages; indicative for the cultural importance of Jewish medicine?Lysons directly goes wrong interpretatively. It is clear that he connects Jewishmedicine to his view on Judaism as a religion. The link to other cultures withtheir religious slant makes this clear: “The medical practices of the Hebrew didnot differ much from those of the peoples around them. Some medications arementioned in the Bible, like mandrake, balms, gum, spices, oils and perhapsdrugs, but the list of medications is noteworthy short, compared to the abundantmateria medica of Mesopotamian and Egyptian physicians”. 115 We will see howgreat the influence was of Jewish scholars like Maimonides – called Rambam inthe Jewish world – who was a great doctor in the Arabic world and court physicianof the Sultan in Egypt.Comparing the medical activities within the great cultures of the Middle-Eastdoes not do justice to Jewish medicine. Place and function of the doctor withinJewish tradition are completely governed by the ultimate principles. A Jewish114 Shyrock, Richard Harrison, The Development of Modern Medicine, A.A. Knopf, New York 1947 (quote Lyons in AnIllustrated History of Medicine, 1978. Abrams, New York.)115 Lyons/Petrucelli, History of Medicine, op. cit. p. 70
- Page 79 and 80: 79Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 81 and 82: 81Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 83 and 84: 83Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 85 and 86: 85Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 87 and 88: 87Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 89 and 90: 89Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 91 and 92: 91Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 93 and 94: 93Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 95 and 96: 95Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Pr
- Page 97 and 98: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 99 and 100: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 101 and 102: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 103 and 104: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 105 and 106: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 107 and 108: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 109 and 110: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 111 and 112: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 113 and 114: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 115 and 116: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 117 and 118: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 119 and 120: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 121 and 122: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 123 and 124: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 125 and 126: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 127 and 128: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 129: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 133 and 134: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 135 and 136: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 137 and 138: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 139 and 140: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 141 and 142: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 143 and 144: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 145 and 146: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 147 and 148: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 149 and 150: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 151 and 152: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 153 and 154: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 155 and 156: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 157 and 158: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 159 and 160: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 161 and 162: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 163 and 164: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 165 and 166: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 167 and 168: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 169 and 170: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 171 and 172: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 173 and 174: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 175 and 176: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 177 and 178: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
- Page 179 and 180: Womb as Paradise Lost - Foetal Prog
Womb as Paradise Lost – Foetal Programming
Thetic Part 2 – Prolegomena
130
Ein Sof, Elohiem and YHWH, as an Absolute unity, constitute the Ultimate Core
for the evolution of creation and culture. In this research they are indicated nontheologically
as G’d. 112 When in this study I speak of G’d, he/she/it is the philosophical
“You” of the Transcendent and the Immanent, a non-sexist and anthropomorphic
indication as he, she or it, with which we refer to the Source. 113
In this study, they are present as Supporting Instances, Sources of Creative energy,
that have everything to do with medicine, therapy and coaching.
In this respect Spinoza plays an important role because of his relationship to Taoism.
To my research, his view on nature is indispensable and not to be overestimated
in the argumentation for medical philosophy.
We conclude this general introduction with the remark that Hebrew language will
relate us to modern natural sciences and quantum-mechanics. With that, Tanakh
becomes a book that specifically establishes a basis for the ultimate questions of
beginning and end, of man and creation, without getting bogged down in traditional,
dogmatic religiousness.
How is that possible? Well, because Hebrew is an alphanumeric language. Every
letter has a numerical value. As cultural history has demonstrated, calculating is
older than language. Telling stories is an ancient activity, but the numerical proportions
underneath the story constitute a more reliable basis for interpretation
and understanding. Not for nothing, mathematics is the universal language of
science. Logo-technics and analysis of the numerical structures that constitute the
linguistic architecture of Tanakh, will uncover the juxtaposition between natural
sciences and Tanakh, so that there is no more contradiction, but equilibrium.
112 Maimonides has emphasized as quintessence the body- and imageless-ness of G’d in his 13 articles of faith. Therefore,
in our research the source of knowledge we occasionally indicate with G’d, is “dynamic creating Energy”: the Primary
Being or Ein Sof.
113 With this I did not want to create a contradiction to Pascal, who differentiates between the G’d of Abraham and the
God of the philosophers. This dualism tends too much to Descartes, who was justly opposed by Spinoza’s monism.