Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...

Judicial Review and Judicial Activism
“Judicial Governance” is a criticism leveled by people who believe
that justice officials act inappropriately or beyond their legitimate legal
authority when checking the exercise of power by the executive or the
legislature. It is strong criticism of the judicial institution that should be
considered by all parties concerned. In particular, every judicial
organization should strictly check its own performance, like accelerating
the expansion of new legal knowledge and sticking to procedure when
judging cases in order to make all parties involved trust that the court has
always attached great importance to bringing justice without
discrimination or prejudice towards any individual or case. More
importantly, performance must be checked and transparent to confirm
that judges perform their duties by taking into consideration their
responsibility to the society and parties concerned. The exercise of
judicial power to judge a case must be based on facts and the application
of law, which comes from a rational judging process with completely no
prejudice toward any parties.
143