22.12.2012 Views

Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...

Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...

Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Panel Discussion<br />

improvements in the delivery, culture <strong>and</strong> responsiveness <strong>of</strong> many<br />

services. 11 Citizens’ charters have been broadly adopted, especially<br />

in commonwealth countries.<br />

Legislating, promoting <strong>and</strong> enforcing right to information<br />

acts: The passage <strong>of</strong> the 2005 Right to Information Act in India<br />

is a step in this direction. As its preamble notes, the act seeks “to<br />

promote transparency <strong>and</strong> accountability in the working <strong>of</strong> every<br />

public authority.” It was enacted in the belief that “an informed<br />

citizenry <strong>and</strong> transparency <strong>of</strong> information” is vital in any<br />

democracy “to hold governments <strong>and</strong> their instrumentalities<br />

accountable to the governed.” Its enactment holds out the serious<br />

hope that social movements can now access information necessary<br />

to promote social <strong>and</strong> administrative justice. The hope is<br />

sustained by the experience <strong>of</strong> social movements with the right to<br />

information act legislated in the Indian state <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan in<br />

2000. The Rajasthan Right to Information Act has, among other<br />

things, been used by NGOs to check corruption in rural works.<br />

Well-known activists Aruna Roy <strong>and</strong> Nikhil Dey refer to two<br />

such incidents:<br />

- In 1998 . . . the Sarpanches [local <strong>of</strong>ficials] <strong>of</strong> Kukarkhada<br />

(Rajsam<strong>and</strong> district), Rawatmala <strong>and</strong> Surajpura (Ajmer<br />

district) apologized for committing fraud <strong>and</strong> publicly<br />

returned money after being confronted with incontrovertible<br />

public evidence at a public hearing.<br />

- In 2001, in Janawad panchayat (Raj sam<strong>and</strong> district) the<br />

information <strong>of</strong> public works expenditure painted on a<br />

panchayat wall led to the people to mobilize <strong>and</strong> protest<br />

exposing fraud <strong>and</strong> ghost works amounting to Rs.70 lakh, at<br />

a public hearing. This was later substantiated by a special<br />

11 House <strong>of</strong> Commons – Public Administration Select Committee. “From Citizen’s<br />

Charter to Public Service Guarantees: Entitlement to Public Services”, July 15, 2008,<br />

p. 9, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmpubadm/411/<br />

411.pdf.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!