25.06.2020 Views

epdf.pub_the-nuts-and-bolts-of-proofs-third-edition-an-intr

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solutions for the Exercises at the End of the Sections and the Review Exercises 157

11. (The statement has only impUcit hypotheses. Before proceeding we

must be sure that we are famihar with the definition of rational

numbers and their operations and properties. We can reformulate the

statement in the following way: If ^ is a rational number, then

q 7^ V2. This statement is equivalent to: If ^ is a rational number,

then q^ i^ 2. Because we cannot directly check that the square of each

rational number is not equal to 2, we will try to prove the

contrapositive of the statement.) The statement to be proved is "If q

is a rational number, then c^ / 2." We will assume that there exists a

rational number ^ such that (^ — 2. Because g is a rational number, it

can be written as ^ = a/h, where a and h are relatively prime integer

numbers, b7«^ 0, and a 7^ 0 (because ^ / 0 as 0^ / 2). Because c^ — 2,

we have fi = 2. This is equivalent to:

0^ = 2b^ (*)

Thus, a^ is a multiple of 2. This implies that a is a multiple of 2.

Therefore, a = 2/c for some integer number k. If we substitute into

equation (*), we obtain 4/c^ = 2b^. Thus, 2fc^ = b^. This implies that b^

is a multiple of 2. Therefore, b is a multiple of 2; that is, b = 2s for

some integer number s. Our calculations show that a and b have at

least 2 as a common factor. However, by hypothesis, a and b are

relatively prime integer numbers. Because it is impossible to find two

numbers that satisfy both these conditions at the same time, we

cannot find a rational number such that q^ = 2.

12. Let y=zax-\-b and y=:cx'{-d be the equations of the two lines.

Because the lines are distinct by hypothesis, we know that either a^c

oxb^d. The coordinates of the intersection point are the solutions of

the system:

3; = ax 4- b

y = ex + d.

Therefore, we obtain ax + b = ex + d or (a - c)x = d - fc. If a — c = 0,

the system has no solutions because b^d, (We can explain this result

geometrically. The two lines have the same slope; therefore, they are

parallel and distinct. Thus, they have no points in common.) If

a - c7»^ 0, we obtain the only solution, x = ^. Therefore, the unique

intersection point is the one having coordinates (^,^frf^). (This

statement can be proved using its contrapositive as well. In this case,

start by assuming that the two lines have two points in common, and

use algebraic steps to obtain the conclusion that a = c and b = d)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!