21.12.2012 Views

Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1

Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1

Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Improvement <strong>of</strong> Grain Legume <strong>Production</strong> in Semi-Arid Kenya 167<br />

in agricultural research. The governments need to encourage agricultural development<br />

<strong>and</strong> create rural infrastructure that will permit crop surpluses to be marketed.<br />

If agricultural productivity is very low in Africa for ecological <strong>and</strong> climatological<br />

reasons, perhaps the real lesson is that growth should be led much more by outwardoriented<br />

industry <strong>and</strong> services, rather than blindly making yet another attempt to<br />

transplant integrated rural development strategies from other parts <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

without customising them to Africa’s unique conditions. However, a food programme<br />

for Africa must be intimately related to the needs <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the world. The<br />

aim should not only be self-sufficiency but should be to become a major net supplier<br />

to the rest <strong>of</strong> the world. No matter how successful Africa’s efforts are to industrialize,<br />

it remains a fact that Africa will be for many generations, primarily a<br />

producer <strong>of</strong> agricultural <strong>and</strong> other primary products. We must learn to do it well<br />

<strong>and</strong> on a rapidly growing scale. This will require massive frontal attack, not only<br />

on the research needs but also on the practical problems <strong>of</strong> production, storage<br />

<strong>and</strong> marketing (Eicher, 1999).<br />

It should be noted that much <strong>of</strong> the needed food can be produced by smallholder<br />

farmers using improved technologies (Uph<strong>of</strong>f <strong>and</strong> Altieri, 1999). In fact, new<br />

rural development approaches <strong>and</strong> low-input technologies spearheaded by farmers<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-governmental organisations are making a significant contribution to food<br />

security at household, national <strong>and</strong> regional levels in some parts <strong>of</strong> Africa (Pretty,<br />

1995). Yield increases are being achieved by using technological approaches, based<br />

on agroecological principles that emphasize diversity, synergy, recycling <strong>and</strong> integration<br />

<strong>and</strong> social processes that emphasize community participation <strong>and</strong><br />

empowerment (Rosset, 1999). When such features are optimised, yield enhancement<br />

<strong>and</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> production are achieved, as well as a series <strong>of</strong> ecological services<br />

such as conservation, improved natural pest regulation mechanisms, etc. (Altieri,<br />

1996). These results can be used to achieve food security <strong>and</strong> environmental preservation<br />

in developing countries, but their potential <strong>and</strong> further spread depends on<br />

investments, policies, institutional support <strong>and</strong> attitude changes on the part <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

makers <strong>and</strong> scientific community (Binswanger, 1998). Failure to promote such<br />

people-centred agricultural research <strong>and</strong> development due to diversion <strong>of</strong> funds<br />

<strong>and</strong> expertise will forego an historical opportunity to raise agricultural productivity<br />

in economical viable, environmentally benign <strong>and</strong> socially uplifting ways. It<br />

is clear that food security for a growing African population is more important than<br />

food self-sufficiency <strong>and</strong> it should, therefore, be the major thrust in formulating new<br />

agricultural policies.<br />

1.3. The arid <strong>and</strong> semi-arid areas <strong>of</strong> Kenya – their extend <strong>and</strong> climatic<br />

1.2. conditions<br />

The arid <strong>and</strong> semi-arid l<strong>and</strong>s (ASALs) cover approximately 80% <strong>of</strong> the total l<strong>and</strong><br />

surface <strong>of</strong> Kenya (Figure 1) <strong>and</strong> support slightly over 25% <strong>of</strong> the population, owning<br />

over 50% <strong>of</strong> Kenya’s livestock population (Langat <strong>and</strong> Magwata, 1994). About 60%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the country’s cattle population, 70% <strong>of</strong> its sheep <strong>and</strong> goats, <strong>and</strong> over 100% <strong>of</strong><br />

the camels are found in the ASALs (Brown, 1994). ASALs are subject to low <strong>and</strong><br />

erratic rainfall with great intra-<strong>and</strong> inter-annual variations. This variability becomes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!