Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Improvement <strong>of</strong> Grain Legume <strong>Production</strong> in Semi-Arid Kenya 167<br />
in agricultural research. The governments need to encourage agricultural development<br />
<strong>and</strong> create rural infrastructure that will permit crop surpluses to be marketed.<br />
If agricultural productivity is very low in Africa for ecological <strong>and</strong> climatological<br />
reasons, perhaps the real lesson is that growth should be led much more by outwardoriented<br />
industry <strong>and</strong> services, rather than blindly making yet another attempt to<br />
transplant integrated rural development strategies from other parts <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
without customising them to Africa’s unique conditions. However, a food programme<br />
for Africa must be intimately related to the needs <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the world. The<br />
aim should not only be self-sufficiency but should be to become a major net supplier<br />
to the rest <strong>of</strong> the world. No matter how successful Africa’s efforts are to industrialize,<br />
it remains a fact that Africa will be for many generations, primarily a<br />
producer <strong>of</strong> agricultural <strong>and</strong> other primary products. We must learn to do it well<br />
<strong>and</strong> on a rapidly growing scale. This will require massive frontal attack, not only<br />
on the research needs but also on the practical problems <strong>of</strong> production, storage<br />
<strong>and</strong> marketing (Eicher, 1999).<br />
It should be noted that much <strong>of</strong> the needed food can be produced by smallholder<br />
farmers using improved technologies (Uph<strong>of</strong>f <strong>and</strong> Altieri, 1999). In fact, new<br />
rural development approaches <strong>and</strong> low-input technologies spearheaded by farmers<br />
<strong>and</strong> non-governmental organisations are making a significant contribution to food<br />
security at household, national <strong>and</strong> regional levels in some parts <strong>of</strong> Africa (Pretty,<br />
1995). Yield increases are being achieved by using technological approaches, based<br />
on agroecological principles that emphasize diversity, synergy, recycling <strong>and</strong> integration<br />
<strong>and</strong> social processes that emphasize community participation <strong>and</strong><br />
empowerment (Rosset, 1999). When such features are optimised, yield enhancement<br />
<strong>and</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> production are achieved, as well as a series <strong>of</strong> ecological services<br />
such as conservation, improved natural pest regulation mechanisms, etc. (Altieri,<br />
1996). These results can be used to achieve food security <strong>and</strong> environmental preservation<br />
in developing countries, but their potential <strong>and</strong> further spread depends on<br />
investments, policies, institutional support <strong>and</strong> attitude changes on the part <strong>of</strong> policy<br />
makers <strong>and</strong> scientific community (Binswanger, 1998). Failure to promote such<br />
people-centred agricultural research <strong>and</strong> development due to diversion <strong>of</strong> funds<br />
<strong>and</strong> expertise will forego an historical opportunity to raise agricultural productivity<br />
in economical viable, environmentally benign <strong>and</strong> socially uplifting ways. It<br />
is clear that food security for a growing African population is more important than<br />
food self-sufficiency <strong>and</strong> it should, therefore, be the major thrust in formulating new<br />
agricultural policies.<br />
1.3. The arid <strong>and</strong> semi-arid areas <strong>of</strong> Kenya – their extend <strong>and</strong> climatic<br />
1.2. conditions<br />
The arid <strong>and</strong> semi-arid l<strong>and</strong>s (ASALs) cover approximately 80% <strong>of</strong> the total l<strong>and</strong><br />
surface <strong>of</strong> Kenya (Figure 1) <strong>and</strong> support slightly over 25% <strong>of</strong> the population, owning<br />
over 50% <strong>of</strong> Kenya’s livestock population (Langat <strong>and</strong> Magwata, 1994). About 60%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the country’s cattle population, 70% <strong>of</strong> its sheep <strong>and</strong> goats, <strong>and</strong> over 100% <strong>of</strong><br />
the camels are found in the ASALs (Brown, 1994). ASALs are subject to low <strong>and</strong><br />
erratic rainfall with great intra-<strong>and</strong> inter-annual variations. This variability becomes