Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chestnut, an Ancient Crop with Future 113<br />
width ranged from 2.0 to 11.3 cm (4.5 cm on average) (Table 5). The widest point<br />
in the leaf is localised at 7.6 cm from the base. Petiole length is 1.7 cm on average,<br />
with 0.5 cm the minimum <strong>and</strong> 3.8 the maximum. Leaves present 17 secondary<br />
veins forming a 47° angle with the main vein, but only 15 finished in incisions <strong>of</strong><br />
margin.<br />
Burs bear two chestnuts on average <strong>and</strong> the third in the middle usually does<br />
not develop, though occassional burs present up to six normal chestnuts. A normal<br />
nut by bur was 66% on average (Table 5). Each bearing shoot presents two burs,<br />
but occasionally has up to eight. Spines length is 1.23 cm on average, but is highly<br />
variable (Pereira-Lorenzo et al., 1996a <strong>and</strong> c) (Figure 3): (1) few cultivars (14%)<br />
showed long spines <strong>of</strong> 1.56 cm on average. (2) Most <strong>of</strong> the cultivars (68%) showed<br />
medium size <strong>of</strong> 1.23 cm on average. (3) 19% <strong>of</strong> Galician cultivars presented short<br />
spines <strong>of</strong> 0.95 cm on average. Most <strong>of</strong> the burs appeared at the end <strong>of</strong> the bearing<br />
shoots (77% <strong>of</strong> the samples).<br />
Lateral <strong>and</strong> central nuts in the bur are significantly different in most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
parameters (Pereira-Lorenzo et al., 1996c). Lateral nuts are longer, broader <strong>and</strong><br />
thicker than central ones. Average style length was 0.9 <strong>and</strong> 0.8 cm, respectively.<br />
Variation in weight has been taken in account in selection <strong>of</strong> cultivars. Smaller<br />
nuts can be considered under 10 g, medium between 10 <strong>and</strong> 15 g <strong>and</strong> large one<br />
over 15 g (Figure 4).<br />
In Galicia (North-western Spain), the mean weight <strong>of</strong> the central nuts was<br />
10.1 g, <strong>and</strong> 11.1 g for lateral ones, with a kernel percentage <strong>of</strong> 76 <strong>and</strong> 77%,<br />
respectively.<br />
Average number <strong>of</strong> nuts per kg for Galician cultivars (North-western Spain)<br />
was 106 (Table 5) versus 73 in Andalucía (South Spain) (Pereira-Lorenzo <strong>and</strong><br />
Ramos-Cabrer, 2002), though sizes <strong>of</strong> the nuts do not appear to be related with<br />
latitude, since in both areas cultivars producing big nuts are cultivated. However,<br />
in the South they have mainly propagated cultivars with larger nuts. In Galicia,<br />
less than 30% <strong>of</strong> the nuts are over 32 mm, though some cultivars produce more<br />
than 50% <strong>of</strong> nuts over 36 mm. In the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s, some cultivars such as<br />
Arafero produce 70 nuts per kg while De Sala, Del Haya, or Donosa produce more<br />
than 100 nuts per kg (Pereira et al., 2001b).<br />
Normal nuts can vary from 1.2 cm to 4.3 cm in length, 1.0 cm to 4.7 cm in<br />
width <strong>and</strong> 0.7 to 3.9 cm in thickness. The mean values for both lateral <strong>and</strong> central<br />
nuts being 2.8–2.9, 3.2–3.3 <strong>and</strong> 1.8–2.0 cm, respectively (Table 5). Hilum size<br />
can vary between 0.3 × 0.7 cm to 1.3 × 2.0 cm in central nuts <strong>and</strong> 0.3 × 0.9 cm<br />
to 3.0 × 4.1 cm in lateral ones.<br />
Five types <strong>of</strong> shapes are defined in chestnut, according to the relationship between<br />
the width <strong>and</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the nuts (WL = Width/Length*100) in (1) triangular<br />
(WL < 100), (2) round (WL = 100), (3) elliptical-triangular (100 ≥ WL < 110),<br />
(4) elliptical short (110 ≥ WL < 120), <strong>and</strong> (5) elliptical broad (120 ≤ WL)<br />
(Casabianca <strong>and</strong> Vincensini, 1981) (Figure 5). These shapes have been used in<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> chesnut cultivars in France <strong>and</strong> Spain (Casabianca <strong>and</strong> Vicensini,<br />
1981; Pereira-Lorenzo et al., 1996a).<br />
Penetrations <strong>of</strong> the inner coat in cotyledons can be upto the depth <strong>of</strong> 2.7 cm. Such<br />
penetrations make it difficult for the nut peeling. European nuts are said to be easiest