Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. 1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 Sally A. Bound<br />
5. IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF SPRAYING<br />
Proper spray application is one <strong>of</strong> the most dem<strong>and</strong>ing cultural practices in tree<br />
fruit production, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten one <strong>of</strong> the most expensive. An example <strong>of</strong> this can be<br />
found in the citrus industry where spraying costs amount to more than one-third<br />
<strong>of</strong> the total production cost for fresh market fruit (Muraro et al., cited in Salyani<br />
<strong>and</strong> Whitney, 1990).<br />
Spray application is a complex process involving numerous interdependent components.<br />
Bukovac (1985) outlined the more significant components relating to the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> sprays applied to tree fruits:<br />
– active ingredient (chemical, physical <strong>and</strong> biological characteristics)<br />
– formulation <strong>of</strong> the active ingredient<br />
– characteristics <strong>of</strong> the spray solution<br />
– droplet formation<br />
– spray pattern characteristics<br />
– transport <strong>of</strong> droplets to the target<br />
– target definition <strong>and</strong> characteristics<br />
– environmental parameters during spray application <strong>and</strong> drying<br />
– spray droplet : surface interaction<br />
– spray deposit formation<br />
– penetration <strong>of</strong> the active ingredient<br />
– translocation <strong>of</strong> the active ingredient to the reaction site.<br />
Even as recently as the mid 1980’s, Hislop (1986) suggested that although the<br />
prospect <strong>of</strong> improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> spraying is bright, there is at present no<br />
one system to match the proven reliability <strong>of</strong> the simple traditional sprayer. Bukovac<br />
et al. (1986) also stated that current application equipment was inadequate for efficient<br />
chemical application, <strong>and</strong> component processes were poorly understood. An<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> these components <strong>and</strong> their interactions is the first step in developing<br />
truly efficient spray application systems.<br />
5.1. High volume application<br />
High volume hydraulic spraying has developed in a largely ad-hoc manner from<br />
accumulated experience <strong>of</strong> actual tree spraying operations (Morgan, 1992).<br />
Application with h<strong>and</strong>-lances <strong>of</strong>fers several significant advantages, such as complete<br />
<strong>and</strong> uniform coverage <strong>of</strong> the tree, minimal over-dosing, <strong>and</strong> the ability for the<br />
operator to compensate for deficiencies in droplet size <strong>and</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> droplets to<br />
the target. Droplet size <strong>and</strong> the interaction <strong>of</strong> individual droplets with the plant<br />
surface are not critical in high volume spraying since a thin film <strong>of</strong> spray is deposited<br />
over the entire plant surface.<br />
Although the move away from h<strong>and</strong>-lances to air-blast application increased<br />
the ease <strong>and</strong> speed <strong>of</strong> spraying <strong>and</strong> was less labour intensive, non-uniform coverage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the target with the accompanying problem <strong>of</strong> inconsistency in chemical efficacy<br />
became an important limitation. During the 1970’s <strong>and</strong> 1980’s, orchards in countries<br />
such as USA <strong>and</strong> Australia converted almost entirely to hydraulic, air-blast