Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

spo.nmfs.noaa.gov
from spo.nmfs.noaa.gov More from this publisher
21.12.2012 Views

are used by the species. Churn salmon pass over fishways at three major darns on the Columbia River (Bonneville, The Dalles, and McNary Darns) . In Hokkaido, over 100 manmade darns or other facilities either totally or partially obstruct the migration ong>ofong> adult and young fish (Japan Fisheries Rf'source Conservation Association, 1966). 6.25 Fish screens Because ong>ofong> the short distances to their spawning grounds, churn salmon seldom encounter fish screens, but Weber (1965) listed six such installations that confront churn salmon in Washington. 6.26 Improvement ong>ofong> spawning grounds Some experiments on improvement ong>ofong> spa wning areas have been carried out in the United States and Canada, based on research which has shown that flooding , gravel erosion, silting, and predation cause serious losses. These detrimental characteris tic s ong>ofong> na tural s tr earns have been partially eliminated by regulating flow, improving spawning gravel, and excluding predators. Improved spawning areas for churn salmon are ong>ofong> two types: One consists ong>ofong> a completely artificial streambed, excavated and supplied with clean gravel, an example ong>ofong> which is the Jones Creek channel in British Columbia (Woodland, 1961); a second is a natural stream in which a storage darn regulates flow and where the natural streambed has been improved by loos ening and clearung ong>ofong> the gravel. This type ong>ofong> improvement was recently undertaken on the Big Qualicum River in British Columbia (Lister and Walker, 1966). Egg-to-fry survival has been increased in these controlled-flow spawning areas over that in uncontrolled streams (see section 4.31). Other stream improvements on spawning areas ong>ofong> churn salmon include the removal ong>ofong> rock slides, logjams, beaver darns, debris, and gravel deposits and the channelization ong>ofong> streambeds. 6.27 Habitat improvement Measures to improve natural habitat have not been reported except for those listed in section 6.26. 6.3 Control or alterationong>ofong>chemical features ong>ofong> the environment 6.31 Water pollution control Waste products from mining and the production ong>ofong> wood pulp, dairy products, alcohol, gas, sugar, and starch were detrimental to churn salmon in Hokkaido (Japan Fisheries 74 Resource Conservation Association, 1966). Similar kinds ong>ofong> pollution occur in other countries and undoubtedly affect chum salmon. 6.32 Salinity control No information. 6.33 Artihcial fertilization ong>ofong> waters No information. 6.4 Control or alteration ong>ofong> the biological features ong>ofong> the environment 6.41 Control ong>ofong> aquatic vegetation No information. 6.42 Introduction ong>ofong> fish foods '0 information. 6.43 Control ong>ofong> parasites and disease See section 4.43. 6.44 Control ong>ofong> predation and competition Populations ong>ofong> predators and competitors have been reduced in artificial spawning channels and in some rearing areas ong>ofong> churn salmor. in North America . 6.45 Population manipulation o information. 6.5 Artificial stocking 6.51 Stockmg to maintain runs Hatchery operations for churn salmon are much more extensive 1n Asia , particularly in Japan, than in North America (table 51). From 10 to 12 hatcheries produce less than 10 million fry annually in North America, whereas in Hokkaido alone, 49 hatcheries have produced from 200 million to over 400 million fry. Japanese scientists consider artiiicial propagation as the only practical method to maintain runs ong>ofong> salmon in Japan, which are faced with deterioration ong>ofong> spawning streams from industrial growth (Japan Fisheries Resource Conservation Association, 1966). In Hokkaido, where churn salmon enter 160 streams, from 300,000 to 500,000 adults (57 percent ong>ofong> the escapement) are taken annually from 52 to 64 ong>ofong> the streams for artificial propagation; from 150,000 to 200,000 fish inHonshu are also taken each year for artiiicial propagation. The Japanes e have estimated maximum sustainable yields and economic returns for their

are used by <strong>the</strong> species. Churn salm<strong>on</strong> pass<br />

over fishways at three major darns <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Columbia River (B<strong>on</strong>neville, The Dalles, and<br />

McNary Darns) . In Hokkaido, over 100 manmade<br />

darns or o<strong>the</strong>r facilities ei<strong>the</strong>r totally<br />

or partially obstruct <strong>the</strong> migrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adult<br />

and young fish (Japan Fisheries Rf'source<br />

C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Associati<strong>on</strong>, 1966).<br />

6.25 Fish screens<br />

Because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> short distances to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

spawning grounds, churn salm<strong>on</strong> seldom encounter<br />

fish screens, but Weber (1965) listed<br />

six such installati<strong>on</strong>s that c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>t churn<br />

salm<strong>on</strong> in Washingt<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.26 Improvement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spawning<br />

grounds<br />

Some experiments <strong>on</strong> improvement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spa wning<br />

areas have been carried out in <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States and Canada, based <strong>on</strong> research which<br />

has shown that flooding , gravel erosi<strong>on</strong>, silting,<br />

and predati<strong>on</strong> cause serious losses. These<br />

detrimental characteris tic s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> na tural s tr earns<br />

have been partially eliminated by regulating<br />

flow, improving spawning gravel, and excluding<br />

predators. Improved spawning areas for churn<br />

salm<strong>on</strong> are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two types: One c<strong>on</strong>sists <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

completely artificial streambed, excavated and<br />

supplied with clean gravel, an example <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

which is <strong>the</strong> J<strong>on</strong>es Creek channel in British<br />

Columbia (Woodland, 1961); a sec<strong>on</strong>d is a<br />

natural stream in which a storage darn regulates<br />

flow and where <strong>the</strong> natural streambed<br />

has been improved by loos ening and clearung<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> gravel. This type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> improvement was<br />

recently undertaken <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Big Qualicum River<br />

in British Columbia (Lister and Walker, 1966).<br />

Egg-to-fry survival has been increased in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se c<strong>on</strong>trolled-flow spawning areas over that<br />

in unc<strong>on</strong>trolled streams (see secti<strong>on</strong> 4.31).<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r stream improvements <strong>on</strong> spawning<br />

areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> churn salm<strong>on</strong> include <strong>the</strong> removal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

rock slides, logjams, beaver darns, debris,<br />

and gravel deposits and <strong>the</strong> channelizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

streambeds.<br />

6.27 Habitat improvement<br />

Measures to improve natural habitat have<br />

not been reported except for those listed in<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> 6.26.<br />

6.3 C<strong>on</strong>trol or alterati<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>chemical<br />

features <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

6.31 Water polluti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

Waste products from mining and <strong>the</strong> producti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wood pulp, dairy products, alcohol,<br />

gas, sugar, and starch were detrimental to<br />

churn salm<strong>on</strong> in Hokkaido (Japan Fisheries<br />

74<br />

Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Associati<strong>on</strong>, 1966).<br />

Similar kinds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> polluti<strong>on</strong> occur in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

countries and undoubtedly affect chum salm<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.32 Salinity c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

No informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.33 Artihcial fertilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> waters<br />

No informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.4 C<strong>on</strong>trol or alterati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> biological<br />

features <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

6.41 C<strong>on</strong>trol <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> aquatic vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />

No informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.42 Introducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fish foods<br />

'0 informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.43 C<strong>on</strong>trol <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasites and disease<br />

See secti<strong>on</strong> 4.43.<br />

6.44 C<strong>on</strong>trol <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> predati<strong>on</strong> and competiti<strong>on</strong><br />

Populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> predators and competitors<br />

have been reduced in artificial spawning channels<br />

and in some rearing areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> churn salmor.<br />

in North America .<br />

6.45 Populati<strong>on</strong> manipulati<strong>on</strong><br />

o informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6.5 Artificial stocking<br />

6.51 Stockmg to maintain runs<br />

Hatchery operati<strong>on</strong>s for churn salm<strong>on</strong> are<br />

much more extensive 1n Asia , particularly in<br />

Japan, than in North America (table 51). From<br />

10 to 12 hatcheries produce less than 10<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> fry annually in North America, whereas<br />

in Hokkaido al<strong>on</strong>e, 49 hatcheries have produced<br />

from 200 milli<strong>on</strong> to over 400 milli<strong>on</strong> fry.<br />

Japanese scientists c<strong>on</strong>sider artiiicial propagati<strong>on</strong><br />

as <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly practical method to maintain<br />

runs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salm<strong>on</strong> in Japan, which are faced with<br />

deteriorati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spawning streams from industrial<br />

growth (Japan Fisheries Resource<br />

C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Associati<strong>on</strong>, 1966). In Hokkaido,<br />

where churn salm<strong>on</strong> enter 160 streams, from<br />

300,000 to 500,000 adults (57 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

escapement) are taken annually from 52 to 64<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> streams for artificial propagati<strong>on</strong>; from<br />

150,000 to 200,000 fish inH<strong>on</strong>shu are also taken<br />

each year for artiiicial propagati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The Japanes e have estimated maximum sustainable<br />

yields and ec<strong>on</strong>omic returns for <strong>the</strong>ir

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!