21.12.2012 Views

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 41.--Relati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<strong>the</strong>r fish to chum salm<strong>on</strong> fry as competitors for<br />

food in Khor River, U.S.S.R. (Levanidov, 1959)<br />

Species Felati ve Equivalent Compet it i ve<br />

abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> feeding value 2<br />

compet i ti<strong>on</strong> 1<br />

Percent Percent<br />

Lenok 5. 0 26 .1 55 .7<br />

Grayling 2. 0 4. 8 h.l<br />

Amur ide 7.0 1.1 3.3<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> eudge<strong>on</strong> 28 . 0 1.2 14.0<br />

Lagovsky's minnow 36 . 0 1.4 20.9<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> minnow 12.0 0.2 1.2<br />

St<strong>on</strong>e loach 0 . 3 0.8 o.?<br />

Ninespine stickleback 8. 0 0.1 0.4<br />

Bullhead 1.5 0.1 0.1<br />

Burbot 0 . 2 1. 0 0.1<br />

1 Equivalent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> feeding competiti<strong>on</strong> is best defined by an example. For <strong>the</strong><br />

lenok it means that <strong>on</strong>e lenok ate <strong>the</strong> same quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food organisms as<br />

26.1 chum salm<strong>on</strong> fry.<br />

2 The figures in this column are <strong>the</strong> product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> first two columns expressed<br />

in percentage.<br />

'Figure 13.--Relati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food organisms in Memu River,<br />

Japan (Hikita and Nagasawa, 1960).<br />

century (Shepard et al., 1967). Their efficiency<br />

has been improved by <strong>the</strong> development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

power drums and blocks for handling <strong>the</strong> nets<br />

and by <strong>the</strong> use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nyl<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> webbing (Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

North Pacific Fisheries Commissi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

1962a). Before 1959 (when almost all traps<br />

were abolished by regulati<strong>on</strong>), an extensive<br />

trap-net fishery existed in Alaska. Traps were<br />

also widely used in Washingt<strong>on</strong> and Oreg<strong>on</strong><br />

61<br />

before 1934 and to a much lesser extent in<br />

British Columbia before 1958 (Shepard et al.,<br />

1967).<br />

At present, gill nets, purse seines, and<br />

beach seines are <strong>the</strong> principal types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gear<br />

(table 43). Some chum salm<strong>on</strong> are also taken<br />

by reef nets, holling, traps, and fish wheels<br />

(Internati<strong>on</strong>al North Pacific Fisheries Commissi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

1962a; 1962b). The percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

catches taken by types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gear in 1966 (data<br />

from INPFC Statistical Yearbook, 1966) was<br />

as follows:<br />

Catches<br />

Thousands <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Seines Gill nets O<strong>the</strong>r gear<br />

fish Percent Percent Percent<br />

Alaska 6,456 73.5 26.3 0.2<br />

British<br />

Columbia 1,311 44.2 55.5 0.3<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> 425 48.2 41.1 10.7<br />

Oreg<strong>on</strong> 1 0 100.0 0<br />

Al<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> North American coast, regulati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

establish <strong>the</strong> length and sometimes <strong>the</strong> mesh<br />

size and depth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gill nets. Gill nets us ed for<br />

chum and o<strong>the</strong>r species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salm<strong>on</strong> are generally<br />

made with multifilament nyl<strong>on</strong> and have mesh

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!