21.12.2012 Views

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

feInales were no l<strong>on</strong>ger attended by Inales and<br />

passively guarded <strong>the</strong> redd s. Strekalova (1963)<br />

reported that feInales guarded <strong>the</strong> redds 1 to 6<br />

days (average 3 to 4 days) after depositing<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir eggs in <strong>the</strong> My River, U.S.S.R.<br />

Egg retenti<strong>on</strong> (table 15) has not generally<br />

been c<strong>on</strong>sidered aniInportant cause <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> egg loss.<br />

SeInko (1954) presented data to show that egg<br />

retenti<strong>on</strong> can increase when spawning density<br />

is high:<br />

Year Eggs retained per female Total eggs deposited 6<br />

1947<br />

1948<br />

1949<br />

1950<br />

290<br />

45<br />

20<br />

28<br />

68,280<br />

16,050<br />

3,730<br />

2,940<br />

Lister and Walker (1966) also reported an<br />

increased egg retenti<strong>on</strong> (24.5 percent) in a<br />

year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> relatively high spawning density in <strong>the</strong><br />

Big QualicuIn River, British ColuInbia.<br />

6 The size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> area in which <strong>the</strong>se eggs were deposited<br />

was not given.<br />

22<br />

(g) Fr<strong>on</strong>t view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spawning act which lasted<br />

5 to 10 sec<strong>on</strong>ds. The act was repeated until<br />

<strong>the</strong> female had ejected all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> her eggs.<br />

(h) Female covered <strong>the</strong> eggs after spawning,<br />

Eggs have been spawned at depths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12 to 35<br />

CIn. below <strong>the</strong> surface <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> gravel (Kuznetsov,<br />

1928; Myren, WilliaIns<strong>on</strong>, and Ols<strong>on</strong>, 1959;7<br />

Vasilev, 1959). These eggs were deposited in<br />

two to four pockets which were parallel with<br />

<strong>the</strong> current. One egg pocket was 7.6 CIn. deep<br />

and 15.2 CIn. wide; <strong>the</strong> eggs were mixed with<br />

coarse sand and gravel ra<strong>the</strong>r than in a COInpact<br />

cluster [Myren, et al., 1959 (s ee footnote<br />

7)].<br />

As reported by Kuznetsov (1928), redds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

autUInn chuIn sa1In<strong>on</strong> were 125 to 320 cIn.10ng<br />

and 106 to 213 CIn. wide. The redd area averaged<br />

1.3 In.2 for SUInIner chuIn sa1In<strong>on</strong> in <strong>on</strong>e<br />

Asian streaIn (Vasilev, 1959), and 2.3 In.2 for<br />

autUInn chuIn salIn<strong>on</strong>infour sInall NorthAInerican<br />

streaInS (Burner, 1951).<br />

7 Myren, R. T., R. S. Williams<strong>on</strong>, and J. M. Ols<strong>on</strong>. 1959.<br />

Salm<strong>on</strong> survival investigati<strong>on</strong>s. U.S. Fish. Wild!. Serv.,<br />

Bur. Commer. Fish., Alaska Regi<strong>on</strong> (Juneau), Operati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Rep. - July I, 1958 to Feb. 3, 1959, with notes <strong>on</strong> 1957<br />

studies. 44 pp. (Processed.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!