[libribook.com] Traumatic Scar Tissue Management 1st Edition

16.06.2020 Views

One of the most obvious differences between CT and fascial/myofascialtechniques and other massage techniques is that a lubricant is generally notapplied.Lack of lubricant allows for engaging or hooking into CT and fascia and theability to load the tissue and create drag. As tissue is therapeutically loaded andmoved it will eventually encounter barrier and bind. Recall, barrier is the firstfeltslight resistance to manually applied challenge, and bind is the point wheretissue no longer moves freely/easily with mechanical force application.Drag can be graded (Fritz 2013) (see Box 9.9). Generally speaking, whenworking with traumatic scar tissue, skin/CT and fascial/myofascial techniquesare aimed at drag level 2–3.As discussed throughout this book, pathophysiological scars are characterized bypathologically excessive dermal fibrosis and aberrant wound healing. During thewound-healing process, measures taken to prevent aberrant wound healing is tobe considered a primary treatment focus, and this includes employing techniquesdesigned to address undue tissue tension. As noted at the beginning of thischapter, employing techniques designed to interface with the tension/toneregulators, the nervous system (NS) and integrin system, will achieve the desiredoutcome.When working with established traumatic scar tissue, skin/CT andfascial/myofascial techniques are directed at releasing tissue restrictions or denseor stuck sliding layers that have been identified through assessment andevaluation.Box 9.9

Drag scale• 0: no drag• 1: moves the tissue but no bind occurs• 2: moves the tissue to bind• 3: maximum drag, moves the tissue beyond bind.Adapted from Fritz 2013.

Drag scale

• 0: no drag

• 1: moves the tissue but no bind occurs

• 2: moves the tissue to bind

• 3: maximum drag, moves the tissue beyond bind.

Adapted from Fritz 2013.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!