[libribook.com] Traumatic Scar Tissue Management 1st Edition
Interprofessional CollaborationInterprofessional collaboration is a mutual and coordinated approach to shareddecision-making around health and social issues (CIHC 2010).The World Health Organization (WHO) defines collaborative practice inhealthcare as occurring ‘when multiple health workers from differentprofessional backgrounds provide comprehensive services by working withpatients, their families, caregivers and communities to deliver the highest qualityof care across settings.’Traumatic scar clients presenting with complex health needs and complexmedical issues can be best served by interprofessional teams (Bridges et al.2011). An interprofessional approach allows for the sharing of expertise andperspectives to form a common goal of restoring or maintaining an individual’shealth and improving outcomes (Barker & Oandasan 2005, Lumague et al. 2008,Bridges et al. 2011).Patients receive safer, high quality care when health professionals workeffectively in a team, communicate productively and understand each other’sroles (Rao 2003, Morrison 2007, Bridges et al. 2011). Conversely, poorinterprofessional collaboration can have a negative impact on the quality ofpatient care (Zwarenstein et al. 2005).Successful collaborative interactions exhibit a blending of professional culturesand are achieved though cooperation, effective communication, knowledge andinformation sharing, collaborative decision-making and mutual trust and respect.Understanding the professions of others and your own role in the healthcareteam is critical. It is this partnership that creates an interprofessional teamdesigned to work on common goals to improve patient outcomes (Bridges et al.2011).Skills in working as an interprofessional team, gained through interprofessionaleducation, are important for high quality care. Training future healthcareproviders to work in such teams will help facilitate this model resulting inimproved healthcare outcomes for patients (Bridges et al. 2011).In 1998, The College of Family Physicians in Canada published an article, the
‘Physicians’ perspective of massage therapy’(Verhoef & Page 1998) - citing:Physicians demonstrated a discrepancy between their knowledge of MTand their opinions of, and referrals to, the profession. Physicians whoreferred patients to massage therapists generally held more positiveopinions and had more knowledge of the discipline.Although a more heightened awareness of MT has come to fruition in the presentday, it still often falls to the MT professional to educate clients and other medicalprofessionals on the benefits of MT and what you as a professional can bring tothe team. It is our professional responsibility to advocate on behalf of our clientsand in order to further MT inclusion in interprofessional collaboration, we mustall be keenly proactive.Interprofessional Communication: Speak the LanguageAcross healthcare providers there exists variations in terminology and languagewhen documenting and discussing patient outcomes. When workinginterprofessionally, it is important to become familiar with common or universalmedical terms, whether writing progress notes, detailed reports or anintroductory letter.It is important to use proper medical terminology when communicating, writtenor verbal, with other healthcare professionals. When other healthcare providersbecome familiar with your expertise and understanding of the patients’ needs,good interprofessional rapport will be established.Various online medical terminology resources (e.g.http://www.medilexicon.com) and medical terminology/abbreviation apps areuseful tools to assist with communication.
- Page 615 and 616: not only does the brain carry memor
- Page 617 and 618: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 619 and 620: Somatoemotional ResponseDuring trea
- Page 621 and 622: • If the client asks what happene
- Page 623 and 624: Clinical ConsiderationWorking with
- Page 625 and 626: Given the impact of trauma on the b
- Page 627 and 628: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 629 and 630: The Massage Therapist and TraumaThe
- Page 631 and 632: Bordoni B, Zanier E (2014) Skin, fa
- Page 633 and 634: Foex (2013) Surgical Tutor UK Avail
- Page 635 and 636: Kutner JS, Smith MC, Corbin L et al
- Page 637 and 638: Schmidt NB, Richey JA, Zvolensky MJ
- Page 639 and 640: CHAPTER 8Communication and the ther
- Page 641 and 642: The Therapeutic RelationshipThe the
- Page 643 and 644: Needs assessment, treatment plannin
- Page 645 and 646: Clinical ConsiderationIt is importa
- Page 647 and 648: Therapeutic Closeness and Vulnerabi
- Page 649 and 650: BoundariesOver the course of our li
- Page 651 and 652: Box 8.1Aside from obvious sexually
- Page 653 and 654: Box 8.2Eight principles that guide
- Page 655 and 656: Effective Listening and Empathetic
- Page 657 and 658: Clinical ConsiderationNever underst
- Page 659 and 660: Clinical ConsiderationAs manual the
- Page 661 and 662: Interview exampleMary is a client w
- Page 663 and 664: SummarySeveral pieces of informatio
- Page 665: with traumatic scar tissue clients.
- Page 669 and 670: Referral exampleTonya, a 21-year-ol
- Page 671 and 672: Referral exampleJane experienced me
- Page 673 and 674: CHAPTER 9Assessment and treatmentHe
- Page 675 and 676: MT. Additionally, sometimes people
- Page 677 and 678: Traumatic Scars and Associated Impa
- Page 679 and 680: Clinical ConsiderationReduction of
- Page 681 and 682: Clinical ConsiderationMT has been f
- Page 683 and 684: Clinical ConsiderationMassage can h
- Page 685 and 686: Health History and InterviewA stand
- Page 687 and 688: surrounding muscle structures that
- Page 689 and 690: we are gathering information about
- Page 691 and 692: Keep in mind that the therapist’s
- Page 693 and 694: Continuous evaluation during the se
- Page 695 and 696: Pre-treatment assessment/evaluation
- Page 697 and 698: Scar scalesScar scales can be used
- Page 699 and 700: response to negative pressure. It h
- Page 701 and 702: • Client self-management strategi
- Page 703 and 704: BindOnce barrier is reached or surp
- Page 705 and 706: Table 9.1Comparative of normal and
- Page 707 and 708: 2-3 times a year effectively addres
- Page 709 and 710: Myofascial meridian exampleSuperfic
- Page 711: Clinical ConsiderationKnee and back
- Page 715 and 716: Clinical ConsiderationApplication t
Interprofessional Collaboration
Interprofessional collaboration is a mutual and coordinated approach to shared
decision-making around health and social issues (CIHC 2010).
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines collaborative practice in
healthcare as occurring ‘when multiple health workers from different
professional backgrounds provide comprehensive services by working with
patients, their families, caregivers and communities to deliver the highest quality
of care across settings.’
Traumatic scar clients presenting with complex health needs and complex
medical issues can be best served by interprofessional teams (Bridges et al.
2011). An interprofessional approach allows for the sharing of expertise and
perspectives to form a common goal of restoring or maintaining an individual’s
health and improving outcomes (Barker & Oandasan 2005, Lumague et al. 2008,
Bridges et al. 2011).
Patients receive safer, high quality care when health professionals work
effectively in a team, communicate productively and understand each other’s
roles (Rao 2003, Morrison 2007, Bridges et al. 2011). Conversely, poor
interprofessional collaboration can have a negative impact on the quality of
patient care (Zwarenstein et al. 2005).
Successful collaborative interactions exhibit a blending of professional cultures
and are achieved though cooperation, effective communication, knowledge and
information sharing, collaborative decision-making and mutual trust and respect.
Understanding the professions of others and your own role in the healthcare
team is critical. It is this partnership that creates an interprofessional team
designed to work on common goals to improve patient outcomes (Bridges et al.
2011).
Skills in working as an interprofessional team, gained through interprofessional
education, are important for high quality care. Training future healthcare
providers to work in such teams will help facilitate this model resulting in
improved healthcare outcomes for patients (Bridges et al. 2011).
In 1998, The College of Family Physicians in Canada published an article, the