[libribook.com] Traumatic Scar Tissue Management 1st Edition
InteroceptionDamasio (2003) and Craig (2010) suggest a link between sense of self andinteroceptive awareness. Interoception, subconscious signaling from free nerveendings in the body’s viscera and other tissues, informs the brain about thephysiological state of the body. Interoception is central to regulation ofhomeostasis and thus to motivated behavior, emotion and sociality (Schleip &Jäger 2012, Warner et al. 2014).According to Schleip and Jäger (2012):While sensations from proprioceptive receptors are usually projected viatheir somatomotor cortex, signalling from interoceptive endings isprocessed via the insula region in the brain, and is usually associated withan emotional or motivational component. Attentiveness to one’s physicaland emotional inner bodily experience is a result of good interoceptiveawareness. Refining interoceptive awareness can help improve emotionalunderstanding and self-regulation: a big step toward overall health.A potentially integral but under-researched approach to building self-awarenessand self-regulatory capacity is the development of interoceptive awareness ofattunement to and skills for shifting SNS-driven hyperarousal. Emotionalregulation strategies, particularly those focused on somatic experience, facilitatethe reduction of stress disorder presentations, such as those associated withPTSD (Cloitre et al. 2012, Warner et al. 2014).Unfortunately, somatic approaches to trauma therapy are not commonly includedas first or second line treatment protocols; the gap likely a by-product of a dearthof somatic intervention research outcomes and failure of intervention developersto consider and utilize somatic-based approaches (Warner et al. 2014). Althoughcurrent understanding of complex trauma presentations highlights somaticdysregulation as a major area of difficulty in trauma recovery, utility ofsomatically-based approaches has been under-addressed in the emerging modelsof treatment (D’Andrea et al. 2013, Ford et al. 2013, Kisiel et al. 2014, Warner etal. 2014).
Given the impact of trauma on the brain and NS, somatic-based approaches totreatment seem to warrant heightened consideration. Somatic interventions canassist with improving interoceptive awareness and be assistive tools orcomponents for improving self-regulation (van der Kolk 2014, Warner et al.2014).According to van der Kolk (2014):Trauma victims can’t fully recover until they become familiar with andbefriend the sensations in their bodies. In order to change, one needs to beaware of their sensations and the way their bodies interact with the worldaround them. Physical self-awareness is the first step in releasing thetyranny of past trauma and this begins with people being able to describewhat they feel in their body, not emotions (e.g. fear, anger, anxiety) butphysical sensations like pressure, heat, muscular tension, tingling etc.If the body keeps the score, if memory of trauma is encoded in the viscera,in heart-breaking and gut-wrenching emotions, in autoimmune disorders,and skeletal/muscular problems and if mind/brain/visceral communicationis the royal road to emotion-regulation, this demands a radical shift intherapeutic assumptions and approaches.
- Page 575 and 576: Chronic Stress ResponseChronic stre
- Page 577 and 578: Pathophysiological ConsiderationChr
- Page 579 and 580: Clinical ConsiderationProlonged str
- Page 581 and 582: Psychological Stress and Wound Heal
- Page 583 and 584: Pathophysiological ConsiderationNor
- Page 585 and 586: Pathophysiological ConsiderationStr
- Page 587 and 588: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 589 and 590: Clinical ConsiderationEvidence sugg
- Page 591 and 592: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 593 and 594: Clinical ConsiderationThe effects o
- Page 595 and 596: Stress DisordersFollowing a traumat
- Page 597 and 598: Clinical ConsiderationThe Task Forc
- Page 599 and 600: Clinical ConsiderationCertainly it
- Page 601 and 602: ASD symptoms include (DSM-V 2013):
- Page 603 and 604: Box 7.1Why do medical events potent
- Page 605 and 606: Rehabilitation and reintegrationThi
- Page 607 and 608: Pathophysiological ConsiderationAcc
- Page 609 and 610: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 611 and 612: DissociationDissociation is describ
- Page 613 and 614: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 615 and 616: not only does the brain carry memor
- Page 617 and 618: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 619 and 620: Somatoemotional ResponseDuring trea
- Page 621 and 622: • If the client asks what happene
- Page 623: Clinical ConsiderationWorking with
- Page 627 and 628: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 629 and 630: The Massage Therapist and TraumaThe
- Page 631 and 632: Bordoni B, Zanier E (2014) Skin, fa
- Page 633 and 634: Foex (2013) Surgical Tutor UK Avail
- Page 635 and 636: Kutner JS, Smith MC, Corbin L et al
- Page 637 and 638: Schmidt NB, Richey JA, Zvolensky MJ
- Page 639 and 640: CHAPTER 8Communication and the ther
- Page 641 and 642: The Therapeutic RelationshipThe the
- Page 643 and 644: Needs assessment, treatment plannin
- Page 645 and 646: Clinical ConsiderationIt is importa
- Page 647 and 648: Therapeutic Closeness and Vulnerabi
- Page 649 and 650: BoundariesOver the course of our li
- Page 651 and 652: Box 8.1Aside from obvious sexually
- Page 653 and 654: Box 8.2Eight principles that guide
- Page 655 and 656: Effective Listening and Empathetic
- Page 657 and 658: Clinical ConsiderationNever underst
- Page 659 and 660: Clinical ConsiderationAs manual the
- Page 661 and 662: Interview exampleMary is a client w
- Page 663 and 664: SummarySeveral pieces of informatio
- Page 665 and 666: with traumatic scar tissue clients.
- Page 667 and 668: ‘Physicians’ perspective of mas
- Page 669 and 670: Referral exampleTonya, a 21-year-ol
- Page 671 and 672: Referral exampleJane experienced me
- Page 673 and 674: CHAPTER 9Assessment and treatmentHe
Interoception
Damasio (2003) and Craig (2010) suggest a link between sense of self and
interoceptive awareness. Interoception, subconscious signaling from free nerve
endings in the body’s viscera and other tissues, informs the brain about the
physiological state of the body. Interoception is central to regulation of
homeostasis and thus to motivated behavior, emotion and sociality (Schleip &
Jäger 2012, Warner et al. 2014).
According to Schleip and Jäger (2012):
While sensations from proprioceptive receptors are usually projected via
their somatomotor cortex, signalling from interoceptive endings is
processed via the insula region in the brain, and is usually associated with
an emotional or motivational component. Attentiveness to one’s physical
and emotional inner bodily experience is a result of good interoceptive
awareness. Refining interoceptive awareness can help improve emotional
understanding and self-regulation: a big step toward overall health.
A potentially integral but under-researched approach to building self-awareness
and self-regulatory capacity is the development of interoceptive awareness of
attunement to and skills for shifting SNS-driven hyperarousal. Emotional
regulation strategies, particularly those focused on somatic experience, facilitate
the reduction of stress disorder presentations, such as those associated with
PTSD (Cloitre et al. 2012, Warner et al. 2014).
Unfortunately, somatic approaches to trauma therapy are not commonly included
as first or second line treatment protocols; the gap likely a by-product of a dearth
of somatic intervention research outcomes and failure of intervention developers
to consider and utilize somatic-based approaches (Warner et al. 2014). Although
current understanding of complex trauma presentations highlights somatic
dysregulation as a major area of difficulty in trauma recovery, utility of
somatically-based approaches has been under-addressed in the emerging models
of treatment (D’Andrea et al. 2013, Ford et al. 2013, Kisiel et al. 2014, Warner et
al. 2014).