[libribook.com] Traumatic Scar Tissue Management 1st Edition
include preservation of as much of each structure as possible, measures taken toreduce risk of infection, early return of function, and any required secondaryprocedures (e.g. grafting, skin flap, replantation) (Krishnamoorthy &Karthikeyan 2011, Lafiti 2013).All MT considerations applicable to wound healing, grafting and traumatic scartissue apply.
LiposuctionBrief consideration is given here due to the commonality of problems which mayfollow liposuction with incision scars, scars related to burns and subsequentfibrosis.Liposuction is one of the most popular cosmetic surgery procedures currentlyperformed by plastic surgeons around the world. The original concept ofremoving excess fat from localized areas of the body is credited to CharlesDujarrier who, in 1921, using a uterine curette, attempted to removesubcutaneous fat from the calf and knees of a ballerina. Unfortunately, an injuryto the femoral vessels resulted in the amputation of the dancer’s leg (Dixit &Wagh 2013).Modern liposuction began in 1976 with the technique and instruments of Giorgioand Arpad Fischer. An otolaryngologist, Julius Newman, first used the term‘liposuction’ in 1983.Liposuction is associated with a variety of complications classified as:• Local: such as edema, ecchymosis, seroma, hematoma, asymmetry,irregularities, skin necrosis, neural sequelae, fibrosis and adhesions• Systemic: such as visceral perforation, DVT, infection, significant blood loss.Local complications are more common than systemic.Edema is considered a normal reaction to this trauma-by-appointment. Methodscommonly employed to effectively clear edema are compression garments for 4–6 weeks post-procedure and manual lymphatic drainage in the earlypostoperative period (Shiffman 2006, Dixit & Wagh 2013).Under normal, non-complicating circumstances, tissues are expected to return tonormal feel and function 3 months post-procedure.If brawny postoperative edema with heightened pain and discomfort persistbeyond 6 weeks it is suggested this may be due to excessive trauma to the tissues(e.g. aggressive suctioning) and internal burn-like injury (Shiffman 2006). If this
- Page 499 and 500: Clinical ConsiderationPostsurgical
- Page 501 and 502: following burn injury,bacterial col
- Page 503 and 504: Table 6.1Comparison of scars (Ogawa
- Page 505 and 506: Pathophysiological ConsiderationAcc
- Page 507 and 508: BurnsA burn injury to the skin or o
- Page 510 and 511: Figure 6.1Depth of burn trauma and
- Page 512 and 513: • Stimulate ECM formation• Regu
- Page 514 and 515: Clinical ConsiderationIt has been i
- Page 516 and 517: Clinical ConsiderationMT may be a v
- Page 518 and 519: ThermoregulationThermoregulation (t
- Page 520 and 521: from the tissues and taken up by th
- Page 522 and 523: treatment strategies are difficult
- Page 524 and 525: Clinical ConsiderationSkin rolling
- Page 526 and 527: Sequelae and ComplicationsAdvances
- Page 528 and 529: • Paresthesia - 47%• Arm/should
- Page 530 and 531: breast or around the edge of the ar
- Page 532 and 533: Radiation scarringScar tissue as a
- Page 534 and 535: Implants and painPain of fluctuatin
- Page 536 and 537: LymphedemaBreast cancer treatment o
- Page 538 and 539: volume of fluid that accumulates or
- Page 540 and 541: OneTwoThreeCommonly referred to as
- Page 542 and 543: myokinetic chain/myofascial meridia
- Page 544: • Loss of touch sensation• Clum
- Page 548 and 549: Figure 6.3Distribution of nerves in
- Page 552 and 553: complication is present there is de
- Page 554 and 555: Clinical ConsiderationScar complica
- Page 556 and 557: BreastCancer.org (2015c) Side Effec
- Page 558 and 559: 323-9.Kania A (2012) Scars. In: Dry
- Page 560 and 561: Slemp AE, Kirschner RE (2006) Keloi
- Page 562 and 563: scar tissue, while being mindful of
- Page 564 and 565: Physiological ResponseAs discussed
- Page 566 and 567: • The realization that one is abo
- Page 568 and 569: Stress Response and Stress Hormones
- Page 570 and 571: dissociation and inner shakiness) (
- Page 572: Figure 7.1(A) Summary of the HPA me
- Page 575 and 576: Chronic Stress ResponseChronic stre
- Page 577 and 578: Pathophysiological ConsiderationChr
- Page 579 and 580: Clinical ConsiderationProlonged str
- Page 581 and 582: Psychological Stress and Wound Heal
- Page 583 and 584: Pathophysiological ConsiderationNor
- Page 585 and 586: Pathophysiological ConsiderationStr
- Page 587 and 588: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 589 and 590: Clinical ConsiderationEvidence sugg
- Page 591 and 592: Clinical ConsiderationAccording to
- Page 593 and 594: Clinical ConsiderationThe effects o
- Page 595 and 596: Stress DisordersFollowing a traumat
- Page 597 and 598: Clinical ConsiderationThe Task Forc
- Page 599 and 600: Clinical ConsiderationCertainly it
Liposuction
Brief consideration is given here due to the commonality of problems which may
follow liposuction with incision scars, scars related to burns and subsequent
fibrosis.
Liposuction is one of the most popular cosmetic surgery procedures currently
performed by plastic surgeons around the world. The original concept of
removing excess fat from localized areas of the body is credited to Charles
Dujarrier who, in 1921, using a uterine curette, attempted to remove
subcutaneous fat from the calf and knees of a ballerina. Unfortunately, an injury
to the femoral vessels resulted in the amputation of the dancer’s leg (Dixit &
Wagh 2013).
Modern liposuction began in 1976 with the technique and instruments of Giorgio
and Arpad Fischer. An otolaryngologist, Julius Newman, first used the term
‘liposuction’ in 1983.
Liposuction is associated with a variety of complications classified as:
• Local: such as edema, ecchymosis, seroma, hematoma, asymmetry,
irregularities, skin necrosis, neural sequelae, fibrosis and adhesions
• Systemic: such as visceral perforation, DVT, infection, significant blood loss.
Local complications are more common than systemic.
Edema is considered a normal reaction to this trauma-by-appointment. Methods
commonly employed to effectively clear edema are compression garments for 4–
6 weeks post-procedure and manual lymphatic drainage in the early
postoperative period (Shiffman 2006, Dixit & Wagh 2013).
Under normal, non-complicating circumstances, tissues are expected to return to
normal feel and function 3 months post-procedure.
If brawny postoperative edema with heightened pain and discomfort persist
beyond 6 weeks it is suggested this may be due to excessive trauma to the tissues
(e.g. aggressive suctioning) and internal burn-like injury (Shiffman 2006). If this