[libribook.com] Traumatic Scar Tissue Management 1st Edition

16.06.2020 Views

Clinical ConsiderationMechanoreceptors in skin gather and relay any external (touch)information being provided. In addition to this information being relayed tothe brain, the skin can communicate globally across its own expanse anddeeply as it is contiguous with the various layers of fascia, and all that thefascia is connected to (Abu-Hijleh & Harris 2007, Chaitow 2014). TheECM within the hypodermis or superficial fascia sends out projectionstowards the surface of the skin providing a communication route betweenthe deeper layers of fascia and the surface. Therefore movement, touch orother forms of stimuli can be communicated across all layers, fromsuperficial to deep, and from the subterranean to the surface (Paoletti2006). This connection pathway provides a plausible mechanism forvarious manual therapy approaches to achieve the ‘tissue release’ or tonuschanges we feel beneath our hands during treatment. Release can bemediated by the nervous system (responding to mechanoreceptorstimulation) or via the mechanotransduction pathway, as discussed inChapter 2 (Schleip 2003a, 2003b, Langevin 2006).

Pathophysiological ConsiderationTrauma, mechanoreceptors and proprioceptive disinformationTrauma, including pathophysiological scars, can result in aberrantmechanoreceptor function. Fibrosis and adhesions that occur withpathological scars can lead to innocuous mechanical stimuli beingperceived as noxious, resulting in the subsequent relay of incoherent ormisinformation to local, regional, or central nerve centers (i.e.proprioceptive disinformation). Under- or overestimation of the mechanicalstimuli received results in inappropriate muscular reactions, such asinterference with recruitment and timing of recruitment, which endangersequilibrium, coordination and stability. Consequently, proprioceptivedisinformation can adversely impact the rehabilitative process or increasethe incidence of comorbid injuries (e.g. falling with subsequent sprains orfracture).The interoceptive system, considered the substrate of recognition of self, plays afundamental role in the relationship between one’s subjective state of well-beingand physiological health. Volitional cortical control in humans can directlymodify homeostatic integration (Petrovic et al. 2002, Craig 2003, Critchley et al.2002, Damasio et al. 2000, Derbyshire et al. 2003). This supports that how wefeel about how we feel can influence how we function, right down to thephysiological level.

Pathophysiological Consideration

Trauma, mechanoreceptors and proprioceptive disinformation

Trauma, including pathophysiological scars, can result in aberrant

mechanoreceptor function. Fibrosis and adhesions that occur with

pathological scars can lead to innocuous mechanical stimuli being

perceived as noxious, resulting in the subsequent relay of incoherent or

misinformation to local, regional, or central nerve centers (i.e.

proprioceptive disinformation). Under- or overestimation of the mechanical

stimuli received results in inappropriate muscular reactions, such as

interference with recruitment and timing of recruitment, which endangers

equilibrium, coordination and stability. Consequently, proprioceptive

disinformation can adversely impact the rehabilitative process or increase

the incidence of comorbid injuries (e.g. falling with subsequent sprains or

fracture).

The interoceptive system, considered the substrate of recognition of self, plays a

fundamental role in the relationship between one’s subjective state of well-being

and physiological health. Volitional cortical control in humans can directly

modify homeostatic integration (Petrovic et al. 2002, Craig 2003, Critchley et al.

2002, Damasio et al. 2000, Derbyshire et al. 2003). This supports that how we

feel about how we feel can influence how we function, right down to the

physiological level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!